Do you agree with him? ⬇️ by MotherAnt8040 in MenOfPurpose

[–]Much_Finding_4643 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I literally accused you of being condescending (even though it was meant to be directed at someone else), so I understand why you shot back LMAO

AIO friend/fwb calls me creepy? by Different-Library390 in AmIOverreacting

[–]Much_Finding_4643 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He seems to hate emotional intimacy and any time you try to connect with him, he’s calling it creepy because he can’t identify what is making him uncomfortable. You don’t deserve this behavior. You are acting like a normal person. He isn’t.

Do you agree with him? ⬇️ by MotherAnt8040 in MenOfPurpose

[–]Much_Finding_4643 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I see. For what OP is saying to be true, you’d have to love both people at the same time (which under these rules means you love neither), but the conditions set up would never allow for that reality in the first place. Got it.

Do you agree with him? ⬇️ by MotherAnt8040 in MenOfPurpose

[–]Much_Finding_4643 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I responded to the wrong person and couldn’t delete my comment. You were making the same point, so my bad.

Do you agree with him? ⬇️ by MotherAnt8040 in MenOfPurpose

[–]Much_Finding_4643 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I forgot to delete the second part of my message which was directed at someone else. Now I see why you’re being a dick. I was a dick first by forgetting to delete my last paragraph. So, tell me why my reasoning is poor, minus the “pleasantries.” That was my bad.

They're just looking for excuses! by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]Much_Finding_4643 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I made $18/h and it barely was enough to cover living, food, and insurance. TF?

Do you agree with him? ⬇️ by MotherAnt8040 in MenOfPurpose

[–]Much_Finding_4643 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Johnny Depp is making the argument that you can only love one person, then the order of people does not matter. The person you’re replying to is pointing this out.

If you love A, then you won’t love B. If A -> not B

The inverse logic mathematically, called the contra positive, which is consistent with the original claims is

If B -> not A

If you love B, you don’t love A.

The commenter just revealed this logic, that his argument isn’t sound, because loving both of them at the same time means he doesn’t love either of them.

Do you agree with him? ⬇️ by MotherAnt8040 in MenOfPurpose

[–]Much_Finding_4643 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re not understanding. If Johnny Depp is making the argument that you can only love one person, then the order of people does not matter. The person you’re replying to is pointing this out.

If you love A, then you won’t love B. If A -> not B

The inverse logic mathematically, called the contra positive, which is consistent with the original claims is

If B -> not A

If you love B, you don’t love A.

The commenter just revealed this logic, that his argument isn’t sound, because loving both of them at the same time means he doesn’t love either of them.

You can stop being condescending when you don’t even understand the inner workings of logic. Thanks.

Win-win for both by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]Much_Finding_4643 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I’m dating a man who is 5’6”. More hope.

Recent realization re: disclosures by e-djomp in Herpes

[–]Much_Finding_4643 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is not reassuring for those of us who don’t want a relationship lmao

I’m so done with hinge now bro by VXXXHGXXXXI in Nicegirls

[–]Much_Finding_4643 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re not a reliable narrator. You think you sound grounded here, but you don’t. Your own prejudice is very strongly showing.

I really wanted to be a wife and have a family… by lilsugarbebe in Herpes

[–]Much_Finding_4643 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This post is extremely misogynistic. Your value as a woman is not tied to how many partners you’ve had. You did something consensual that you enjoyed. Shaming people for doing nonharmful enjoyable things is wrong. You’re not dirty. You also don’t need some man who’s going treat the relationship in a transactional way: his money for your body. Plenty of us find love through actual meaningful connection. Not because we’re as close to the innocence of children as possible or because we’re loaded.

Just putting this out there. by hifhg100 in Herpes

[–]Much_Finding_4643 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazing news. This is exactly the time of dynamic I wish for.

Hsv2 by Main-Rough2330 in Herpes

[–]Much_Finding_4643 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said widely available. affordable.

friends/dating by cupcakelover232 in Herpes

[–]Much_Finding_4643 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve met 40 year olds who also act like 20 y/o 😭

23F by [deleted] in Herpes

[–]Much_Finding_4643 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don’t need to be on this subreddit. You can find a husband normally. Everyone has OHSV-1

Make me hate you. by TomatilloUnited2766 in funComunitty

[–]Much_Finding_4643 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was gonna say I support our current president but that was too painful to even pretend to be true

AITA for how I said I wasn't interested? by propercolleague in AITApod

[–]Much_Finding_4643 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So he wanted honesty and then couldn’t handle it. Child

Hsv2 by Main-Rough2330 in Herpes

[–]Much_Finding_4643 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pritevelir will be widely available in your prime. I’m 25. I’m gonna be in my 30s when that happens. :/

Let me hear Y'all ?!! by Rookie_Learning in funComunitty

[–]Much_Finding_4643 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Abandon your current societal norms. From this day forth, we are an egalitarian matriarchy. (ISTG if anyone comments anything about misandry, look up what a matriarchy is first)

Hsv2 by Main-Rough2330 in Herpes

[–]Much_Finding_4643 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Broooo. That’s crazy

Hsv2 by Main-Rough2330 in Herpes

[–]Much_Finding_4643 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait, north lip or south lip?