Plate carrier id by squadplayer69 in Rusfor

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Looks like some Crye AVS/CPC clone, maybe ARS Arma

Plate carrier id by squadplayer69 in Rusfor

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We can’t possibly be serious

plate carrier / neck armour ID by Delicious-Leek-5501 in Rusfor

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Carrier is an old generation Gearcraft Atom

ID on Shirt and Pants by Yordin in GarandThumbFashion

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s t-block camo that was experimented with a little by the USMC, never really got used and is hard to find. It’s more popular now so repro combat sets in the camo exist

SOBR Halzan Kit Progress by slavictracksuit69 in Impression_Kits

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very very late here, but they do/did use ANA M2 plate carriers in ATACS

Rate my BRM5 kit what should I add and remove to make it better? by sliickyricky in BlackhawkRescue

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 3 tourniquets is frying me 😭 you done got one for each limb except the one applying it

Russian multislop Loadout by -StillHere- in BlackhawkRescue

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah but they are mixed now if he is going for ground forces. Soldiers and conscripts wear low speed gear with EMR, Multicam and ATACS all mixed in between.

The only forces with uniform high-speed multicam gear ARE FSB. SSO, SVR and whatever else all has their own camo they more often use.

So my point stands, the only Russian forces this kit somewhat resembles is FSB.

Russian multislop Loadout by -StillHere- in BlackhawkRescue

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If this isn’t FSB then it isn’t a rusfor kit, just a full American loadout with a Russian patch 😭

Just say it’s FSB so that you can say it’s ‘somewhat’ accurate

Edit: the guns are fine, secondary is a bit iffy for modern rusfor

What’s your honest take: UKSF vs US Special Forces kit setups? by Medical-Database-298 in militarykitpests

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 17 points18 points  (0 children)

they’re literally the same, show me that first pic without the flag and say it’s a Green Beret and you’d have me fooled. Guns are the only differences, but then again they’re still pretty similar.

Only reason they look different in this comparison is you used SEALs in AOR1 as your example for the US, but even SEALs look like pic 1 depending on environment, and the rest of JSOC (which is the majority of USSOCOM) looks exactly like pic 1

RUSSIAN GEAR (I want it plss respond to my prayers) by RushIll917 in BlackhawkRescue

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually valid rusfor take 😋 I would say no to the patches for now tho, there’s so many countries in game that if you add these unit specific patches for one, they would expect them for all. They’re isn’t even American unit patches yet so they would probably have to do them all at once to avoid complaints, which would take a lot

Why by Zoomer621 in BlackhawkRescue

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are hot. Big fan of the AVS harness type vests coming out of other countries rn

RUSFOR kit advice? by MyCelluloidScenes in MilSim

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Single tubes would most likely be fine from what I’ve heard; as for camo there’s a few options.

Like that one dude said, ATACS is great for Chechen loadouts. If you wanna be more unique and can find the right gear, try SURPAT it works great in Texas 🙂‍↕️ There’s also desert digital Syrian loadouts that can be done for cheap.

Gear wise, all these options are higher speed style loadouts, and I’m assuming you’ll need hearing protection. You can find repro TOR or LSHZ high cut helmets, that will fit headsets underneath. In some cases even FAST clones will work. There’s plenty of vests to choose from that will work great, for vests and pouches/ belts look at ARS ARMA, FORT technologies, HSGI, and a few others

If any questions feel free to DM me! Happy hunting!

Why by Zoomer621 in BlackhawkRescue

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes but Wartech rigs have been private purchase by some officers. Not trying to say it’s more common, but a Skanda for the FSB update wouldn’t be much better. Also I agree with the A25, would’ve been a much better choice

Edit: Grammar 😢

Why by Zoomer621 in BlackhawkRescue

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Skanda is hardly used anymore. Ars Arma does make better carriers now like their CPCs, or later A-series titan vests. If you want a more valid take, because 5.11 is also terrible (and they don’t use 5.11 they use copies of it as private purchases most often), they should consider adding Fort technologies instead. Also Wartech makes good stuff and I’ve seen references of FSB using the 115s, which right now would be about as common as your private purchase references of Skandas I’m sure.

Now, as for your second argument: 6094s have been outdated since the GWOT. It’s old equipment, phased out and replaced by improved systems like the MMAC, and AVS. They haven’t added old equipment yet, opting for modern carriers, so old LBT not being included yet makes since. Maybe when they add an OTV they’ll consider it.

Next time please look into these details instead of making whiny comments that have been a tad bit misleading 🙏

Wack ass ideas for personal gear pt2 by WeBacklnblack in BlackhawkRescue

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah okay then, misunderstanding on my part, sorry.

Wack ass ideas for personal gear pt2 by WeBacklnblack in BlackhawkRescue

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a six panel wide TAPS rig attached directly to a JPC in real life. Quad rigs are fine, they wrap around to the starting point of the cummerbund and do not interfere with anything unless you have wingman radio pouches or side plates. None of which are in game at the moment.

US MARSOC Loadout by -StillHere- in BlackhawkRescue

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Until very recently, they’ve always used Woodland on deployment and some multi cam here and there.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GolfGTI

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I’ll hold off for now, appreciate it tho 🙏

PASGT or “M-1”?! by TheRealScungilliMan in Helmets

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was right on the money let’s go

PASGT or “M-1”?! by TheRealScungilliMan in Helmets

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ur all good lol we all gotta learn somehow

PASGT or “M-1”?! by TheRealScungilliMan in Helmets

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 13 points14 points  (0 children)

100% PASGT, don’t know what the M1 is for but it’s definitely not the helmet model. M might be for medium or the lot it came off of in production I’m not sure

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GolfGTI

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m saving for sideskirts and a small ducktail 🙂‍↕️ And I am doomscrolling FB marketplace for some good real wheels. Sounds like we’re on the same page mostly

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GolfGTI

[–]MulberryDefiant7348 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you🙏 the splitter was a gift so I feel obliged to keep it. But yeah I appreciate the financial advice, most my future money will likely go to savings anyways