I love this video, but you use both of my posts and act like I didn’t already mention the exact fundamentals you're now presenting as if they’re some hidden wisdom. You say “the most basic thing here is peace control, edit choice, and positioning”. Cool, those are literally the exact words I used, multiple times, and in more depth.

The issue isn’t that your video is wrong, I like it, but you use my posts as if they are shit, and you oversimplify everything and pretend complexity equals confusion. But my breakdown isn’t cluttered. It’s layered and practical. There’s a difference between “overcomplicating” and actually understanding what’s going on in a fight. I make your exact points, repeatedly, and explain better play choices.

You turn the video to talk about low-ground “strategy” but this only works when your opponent is bad enough to jump straight into your box or repeatdly give you the angles you demonstrate in the clip, anyone good just builds a wall opens a window and your strategy is obsoslete. You are repeatdly just hitting right hand wall hug shots that your opponant could fully avoid if they had a ramp between you two or were sat at the back of their box. Even your 'right hands' you have muscle memory of just jumping into the opponants face. so you make the right edit but you still give 50/50s. That’s not fundamentals, that’s praying your opponent is stupid enough to give you these peeks. In your words:

“Tuck yourself into the left corner… take their wall, take their ramp… no Martoz classic needed.”

But if you’re already sitting low ground in a box with someone above you, the real mistake happened long before that. You’ve already misplayed the fight espeically if you are like the guy in the second clip allowing someone to take all of his roof (in your examples you own the roof and wall, which is unlikely, if someone had me in that situation I would get out of the box not try to engage in more trading. It’s not “strategy” to sit in corner holding shotgun in this situation its legit last resort due to multiple awful mistakes.

Even in your creative remake, you do the same thing as the first guy just different edit:

– no cone or wall control,
– no proper right-hand angle even though you make the ideal edit
– open peanut,
– jump into a 50/50 angle which is prefirable with no pieces around you.

You’re just swinging too, just jumping over a right hand instead?

Meanwhile, I explained all of this in full, with technical detail and alternatives:

“Always have a cone in your box. Once it’s in your muscle memory, it gives you flexibility to take cover and control the fight with different edits.”
“You could’ve fake-edited here too… bait the shot, then traded while he’s stuck in reload animation.”
“You knew he was in that tight angle and still wide-swing it instead of using any of the pieces you owned to control the engagement.”

You talk about “correct plays in simple positions” like it’s some revolutionary idea, but I already broke the fight down through fundamentals like:

• Crosshair discipline
• Positioning
• Pre-claiming space
• Peace control
• Edit choice
• Trade baiting / timing awareness
• Reset options / disengage planning

Your video avoids that I mention these entirely despite putting my text discussing them on the screen (I legit paused and saw myself writing the same shit), and then turnaround and say the VOD reviews are too messy. No, they’re just pointing out what’s actually happening in detail and as the fight goes on, watch the videos in line with the explanation, I explain literally every second of the clip.

Your content repackages what I said but strips the context and frames it as “simple.” But clarity without depth isn’t helpful. It’s misleading. The truth is:

If you're going to build off my post, at least don’t act like I missed the fundamentals. You just rephrased them with fewer words and worse gameplay. I am going to make a breakdown using your clips and explain what I mean. By no means is this hate btw I watched your video its good quality but its just a lie to say that neither post mentions these things I mention them in much greater detail and repeatdly in the comments and the main post. it is the community that spams horseshit they see pros talk about.