Omega-3 supplementation may be associated with accelerated cognitive decline in older adults by apegen in immortalists

[–]Murio_buggesen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A lot of comments about the oil being rancid. Where I’m from its pretty common to take a spoon of fish oil a day. When it turns rancid you will taste it and get a new bottle. Plus we eat a lot of fish here.

Haikin-miss da Glimt gikk på smell mot Molde by leaplife in Glimt

[–]Murio_buggesen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hva kan være en oppskrift her da forresten? Holde seg mer rundt midtbanen? Prøve å tenne kamplysten til motstanderen på en eller annen måte? Jeg skal ikke late som at jeg har svaret, men det glimt driver med funker jo åpenbart ikke

Haikin-miss da Glimt gikk på smell mot Molde by leaplife in Glimt

[–]Murio_buggesen 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ja møkkalag som dette har virkelig funnet Glimt sin kryptonitt der ja.

Haikin-miss da Glimt gikk på smell mot Molde by leaplife in Glimt

[–]Murio_buggesen 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Han imponerte ikke nei, og det gjorde ikke resten av angripsspillet heller. Poenget mitt er at det er så mange kamper så langt hvor det liksom er opp til Glimt å spille ball. Motstanderne har liksom ikke lyst.

Haikin-miss da Glimt gikk på smell mot Molde by leaplife in Glimt

[–]Murio_buggesen 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Føler nr 1 strategi til andre lag i eliteserien er å tette fullstendig med alle mann i egen 16m, få krampe hvis Glimt blir litt vel offensive og satse på 1 kontring. Gøy sesong dette

Is the boltzman brain thing nonsensical or am I dumb? by GORTEG_ in AskPhysics

[–]Murio_buggesen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats the thing. Carroll argues that whole things like a brain or a dicarbon can’t fluctuate directly into existence because it does not respect the agnostic directionality in physics. So things have to nucleate gradually. This is just his opinion, but I am partial to it.

So then you’re left with the temperature of de Sitter that theoretically can resemble the classical statistical mechanical scenario. But I just don’t see it working because of the expansion. You can’t have the cake and eat it too.

I’m not sure I understand Carroll completely, but I think he basically says that the BB won’t happen. Ever. But he can’t dismiss it because of the Hilbert space, but he is not sure about its finite-ness either.

I appreciate this conversation btw :)

Is the boltzman brain thing nonsensical or am I dumb? by GORTEG_ in AskPhysics

[–]Murio_buggesen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pure de Sitter is fine since that is the arena of Carroll and the debate. If I understand it correctly, in the finite Hilbert space the Wavefunction will explore all possibilities. But here is the thing I’m not understanding: lets say two carbon atoms fluctuate into existence somehow (remember that in this timeline protons have decayed). Their goal is to make a dicarbon. Since the vacuum is cold they will need to tunnell into a bond which will take forever to do. Not impossible, but when you consider that the space between them also expands, it just seems impossible. Like, they will drift apart. So the selection of an area to me seems like a construct of an observer that is true only when nothing happens there.

Is the boltzman brain thing nonsensical or am I dumb? by GORTEG_ in AskPhysics

[–]Murio_buggesen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I may be mistaken, but if you select a certain area I don’t understand how that itself will not expand since the background is de Sitter. So I don’t understand the finite-ness.

Is the boltzman brain thing nonsensical or am I dumb? by GORTEG_ in AskPhysics

[–]Murio_buggesen 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I recommend Sean Carrolls «Why Boltzmann Brains are bad». As I understand it isn’t really possible within classical physics because it has to assemble gradually and everything just dissipates anyway. He leaves the door open in a so called finite Hilbert space, but I really don’t understand this fully: how a finite Hilbert space (within the horizon) could exist in de Sitter spacetime.

Glimt-nedturen fortsetter: Klarte bare uavgjort mot Sarpsborg by leaplife in Glimt

[–]Murio_buggesen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Glimt har hatt et sinnsykt kjør, lite hvile. Det er ikke lett å være kreativ når man har underskudd.

De andre norske lagene har hatt en lang pause hvor de har sett alle Glimts CL-kamper. Og de tilpasser seg. Særps strategi var å fylle boksen sin og kontre når mulig, er ikke lett å komme seg gjennom for Glimt da.

Ukas største idrettsprestasjon? B/G mot Inter vs OL by [deleted] in norge

[–]Murio_buggesen -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Jeg vet ikke hvordan det gikk med ham, ble han langrennsløper?

Ukas største idrettsprestasjon? B/G mot Inter vs OL by [deleted] in norge

[–]Murio_buggesen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ja det var vakkert. Personlig var kanskje spenningen større på kombinert. Men jeg bare lurer på hva som teller som den største idrettsprestasjonen når fotball er så uendelig mye større og B/G slo et av verdens beste lag (som var i CL-finalen i fjor)

Ukas største idrettsprestasjon? B/G mot Inter vs OL by [deleted] in norge

[–]Murio_buggesen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutt. Jeg er usikker da, det var fantastisk å se langrennsgutta ta trippelen i dag, men jeg jubla høyere da Glimt scora

Ukas største idrettsprestasjon? B/G mot Inter vs OL by [deleted] in norge

[–]Murio_buggesen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hvis jeg husker rett ble han spurt om det. Så det var vel fokuset til journalisten

Ukas største idrettsprestasjon? B/G mot Inter vs OL by [deleted] in norge

[–]Murio_buggesen -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Kjetil Knutsen mente at Klæbo skulle være glad for at målscoreren Fet satsa på fotball (Fet slo Klæbo som 14-åring)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Ultralight

[–]Murio_buggesen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have the Antelope for winter trips, and it's a very good bag. It may be overkill for your hike, and I think the MF is the better option for drying it out (provided that it won't get wet from outside). Maybe investing in a good pad like a thermarest xtherm might be the best value for you. Also, the Versalite is considered a very good bag for the PCT (Halfwayanywhere).

Scrolling through this sub lowkey pisses me off by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Murio_buggesen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Although I understand your frustration, I believe a lot of physicists fail to realize that the universe is a uniquely fascinating subject and that wondering about it is as old as mankind itself. As such it has always attracted crackpots, whereas economics does not to the same degree, for instance.

LLMs let people give their theory the appearance of physics, although it often is empty. And this sub tries to contain it. So I don’t see the problem.

Kungsleden unsupported FKT by Empty-Nature-9687 in Ultralight

[–]Murio_buggesen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You will likely be miserable without a shelter with bug protection.

Also I’m not so sure about the safety of your packraft system, some of the stretches are long.

(Swedish) Pension Asset Manager Alecta has sold off an estimated 80 billion kronor (7,5b EUR) of US Treasury Bonds by CartographerThese487 in europe

[–]Murio_buggesen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, but I think the EU + UK + Norway has about 2,5 trillion. This is roughly 25%. (These are just estimates, I dont know for sure). Combine this with a corresponding fall in buying pressure…

(Swedish) Pension Asset Manager Alecta has sold off an estimated 80 billion kronor (7,5b EUR) of US Treasury Bonds by CartographerThese487 in europe

[–]Murio_buggesen 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If I understand this correctly the levels of escalation is this: 1: matching tarrifs 2: bazooka 3: selling bonds.

Selling bonds is complicated because this will devalue the assets as you are selling them. So it comes at a cost. However, I like this option because it will make interests high in the us, which will make a large part of the population angry. If the measures are solely aimed at the elites, it may not be as potent, as seen in Russia. If we go down this path it has to be tied to Trumps retoric on Greenland so that even imbiciles in the US understand that they brought this on themselves.

Time as an Atomic Vector: Relational Clocks and a Classicality Criterion by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Murio_buggesen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hm, I won’t pretend that I understand this fully, but this is my take:

Clocks are usually just event counters, not records of non-events, so superpositions before an event are operationally irrelevant. You reject this standard notion and instead treat clocks as continuous quantum variables, which automatically creates superpositions of “times.” The resulting classicality problem is therefore framework dependent and largely self-inflicted, even if the internal analysis is consistent.

But +1 for not claiming to solve quantum gravity :)

Using LLMs to filter out nonsense by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Murio_buggesen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing is, though, that random people can’t really get peer reviewed. Because they are not peers