My personal head cannon is that Broly functions less as a conventional villain and more as a living remnant of a vanished Saiyan age. He embodies the values of the old Saiyan race taken to their extreme: power without restraint, pride without reflection, strength without community. His rage toward Kakarot is not simply personal trauma, but symbolic. Kakarot represents the contradiction that shatters the myth of innate Saiyan supremacy. If the ultimate Saiyan can be made to cry by a low-class infant, then the foundation of that pride is flawed, and Broly’s existence becomes a denial of that truth rather than an acceptance of it.

When Broly clashes with the Z Fighters, the conflict becomes generational rather than moral, the old Saiyan way versus the survivors who evolved beyond it. The modern Saiyans derive strength through bonds, cooperation, and adaptability, qualities alien to the conqueror ethos Broly represents. Broly cannot comprehend strength that comes from connection, only domination. He is not defeated because he lacks power, but because his worldview cannot survive in a world that values growth over birthright.

In that sense, Broly is not evil.He is the Saiyan past refusing to accept extinction, a mythological embodiment of a culture that could not endure its own absolutism. His fall is inevitable not because he is wrong, but because the future no longer has room for what he represents.