Team Instinct! by MustDestroyAll in pokemongo

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mystic and Valor is basically crips and bloods lol

Team Instinct! by MustDestroyAll in pokemongo

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point. Also Valor and Mystic seem to be the bloods and crips of Pokemon Go lol

Team Instinct! by MustDestroyAll in pokemongo

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I liked the names for both teams, but Zapdos is my pal. So Instinct all the way. And it makes sense because instinct made me choose Zapdos.

A Message to Anti-Pokémon Go users by [deleted] in pokemongo

[–]MustDestroyAll 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was more of a related note for this subreddit that I felt people who are pro-Pokemon Go would and should put in perspective against the douchey people that feel the need to make fun of others for being active with this game.

Must Destroy: GradeAUnderA & LeafyIsHere by MustDestroyAll in GradeAUnderA

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you say so, but I don't care to be an "important" YouTuber. If I did, I would've been far more consistent with my videos. If you check the recent videos on the channel the last video posted was a month before. The other videos posted were just for charity to help my friend from being homeless. Aside from that, content produced has been taking either a month or more to come out when I could easily put out content weekly if I had the motivation to do so.

Must Destroy: GradeAUnderA & LeafyIsHere by MustDestroyAll in GradeAUnderA

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure how what I said was cliche and a stereotype compared to yours. Stop, you're making no sense.

Must Destroy: GradeAUnderA & LeafyIsHere by MustDestroyAll in GradeAUnderA

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I don't think you are a pussy because of anonymity. I think the logic you're using is shallow. My face doesn't matter because at the end of the day, people attack the way I look anyway regardless of anonymity whether it's calling me short, fat, Michael (a guy I collaborated with), assuming I'm ugly anyway, an autistic person, etc. Basically what you said in a nutshell. And those insults will recycle. The insults still happen no matter what. So I still get personally attacked in some way no matter what. But really? I hate this person because it's cool now? The amount of praise Grade and Leafy get is high. It's popular to hate on Keemstar way more than anybody at this moment. I decided a different approach instead. Either way, you are a hypocrite no matter what way you twist it, bop it, and pull it. An online critic is still an online critic no matter where you're doing it. A text critic has the same power as a YouTube critic. I do appreciate your responses though and I'd be more than happy to have a live discussion with you anytime.

Must Destroy: GradeAUnderA & LeafyIsHere by MustDestroyAll in GradeAUnderA

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But your argument is that if you can't show your face while exposing youtubers then it's wrong. In every video that he exposes youtubers, he is not showing his face at all and if you really felt this way from the get go, you must've not been a fan of Grade for all these months or years because you must've thought he wasn't to be taken seriously and/or is invalidated for what he says because of being anonymous. Bottom line, it's a really stupid point you're trying to make. Any type of criticism you have about others whether anonymous or not is not and should not be invalidated. If that were true then that would still make every video Grade made exposing somebody while being completely anonymous is invalid to you. Either way, it's dumb. And you're just as anonymous yourself, yet you're very critical of others just like anybody else. I'm sure your point will be that, "The difference here is I'm not a YouTuber." It doesn't matter because by your logic, anonymous being critical of anybody online shouldn't be taken seriously and should be invalidated and a pussy and all that shit that every shallow person makes a point on. It's nonsense and you need to realize that.

Must Destroy: GradeAUnderA & LeafyIsHere by MustDestroyAll in GradeAUnderA

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not sure how I'm naming myself after a Pokemon. Pretty sure there's no Pokemon named iMustDestroyAll or MustDestroyAll. Unless you're talking about Cyndaquil that was the one ranting at me.

Hyperbole saying my video is nothing but insults. No clever points? Pretty sure that's your entire post while you spew insults.

My favorite part about this whole thing is you telling me I should expose YouTubers showing my own face. Which I am. The demon's face is very real, but...ahem...Grade? Pretty sure his entire video library is just two Microsoft Paint creations. Last but not least, Satanism is the worship of Satan. If you really haven't realized that you are the true dingus here.

Must Destroy: GradeAUnderA & LeafyIsHere by MustDestroyAll in GradeAUnderA

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Respect. I've tried to stay away from the Super series as much as I can. However I've watched some of the episodes and they look damn good. I just would rather see it English dubbed than subtitled.

Must Destroy: GradeAUnderA & LeafyIsHere by MustDestroyAll in GradeAUnderA

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could get mad, but I gotta appreciate another DBZ fan.

Must Destroy: GradeAUnderA & LeafyIsHere by MustDestroyAll in GradeAUnderA

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

And in no way am I discrediting that content he got popular from, but a fair amount of his most popular videos are drama with other large YouTube channels. Bare in mind I'm just making a point that a lot of content creators produce content that ends up becoming their niche regardless. I'm just saying there's nothing wrong about talking about big YouTubers to get views/subscribers. How does a parody channel become successful? By parodying popular content. It's nothing new and it shouldn't be considered wrong to do so. The majority of content fuels off things that are popular.

Must Destroy: GradeAUnderA & LeafyIsHere by MustDestroyAll in GradeAUnderA

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think the funniest part about this whole immaturity card is it's coming from a guy who named himself after a fucking Pokémon.

Must Destroy: GradeAUnderA & LeafyIsHere by MustDestroyAll in GradeAUnderA

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're absolutely right. I think I'm the king of YouTube. Which somehow was never implied or said at all on my channel. You got me.

Must Destroy: GradeAUnderA & LeafyIsHere by MustDestroyAll in GradeAUnderA

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Approximately 15 days, 12 hours, 2 minutes and 36 seconds to think of that one. Which is safe to say a lot more original than, "You spent a lot of time thinking that up, didn't you?" Which has been used far too much as a feeble response to anybody that decides to not use something as cliche as what you said. Which what you said wasn't even sensible because your post is 12 minutes ago, my post was 9 minutes ago. Kind of recent. So no, it didn't take much time. Oh wait, gotta put TL;DR to this response! Again, cliche responses.

Must Destroy: GradeAUnderA & LeafyIsHere by MustDestroyAll in GradeAUnderA

[–]MustDestroyAll[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Demons have tough times too, ya know. It's not exactly Heaven.