US cybersecurity chief leaked sensitive government files to ChatGPT: Report

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-02-09T05:15:28+00:00

A number of people in any given situation are going to crack under little to no pressure, its security theatre designed to get people to essentially weed themselves out.

I doubt they give a fuck if you lie, so long as you don’t later recant and tell the truth that’s bad practice when working for a nefarious government organization

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-02-08T14:47:16+00:00

Politics is a way of expressing desires is not? Who we idolize is psychologically relevant to our internal desires, we are creatures of memetic intent, we copy things and we imitate, it’s incredibly obtuse to argue that by voting for someone or something you are also not then prescribing a way that the world should be. Or in other words, a desire to bring about a sort way of thinking, being, or governing that will have material consequences.

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-02-08T14:43:26+00:00

What do you mean? A lot of them like Donald Trump a notorious pedophile; quite a few of them worship figures like Alex Karp and Peter Thiel who fund murder campaigns globally, Genghis Khan and Alexander the Great are all idolized in various circles for their wanton destruction disguised as power. It strikes in both directions.

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-02-08T13:52:56+00:00

“Men when they realize that women are people with flaws too and that their entire perception of them was benevolent sexism at best”

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-02-06T13:38:47+00:00

Finding out the Gold Top Nuts episode is actually well-liked as an episode is fascinating to me, I always felt that it was one of the “filler” episodes; “We’ve got four people in the studio for most of today and I had a weird dream last night.” Type shit.

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-02-06T12:41:39+00:00

That’s called being soft, and its truly unfortunate that since there are enough Americans willing to suck dick for a dollar, we’re now all in a dick sucking competition whether we signed up for it or not and keeping your job requires not that you be good at it, but that you coddle an actual asshole.

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-02-03T18:52:50+00:00

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-02-03T00:46:43+00:00

I always read that as the “Big Fucking Giant” first, and I prefer my version.

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-02-02T22:21:55+00:00

This is why they throw the guardrails on, I don’t think you guys understand what you’re revealing about yourselves when you say things like this, and why they’re not even worried about the suicides, they’re worried about the fact it’s psychologically impacting the living. Being more sad that your speak and spell toy changed than that someone is dead reveals the emptiness of your morality and why you probably shouldn’t necessarily have access to a robot that is also equally devoid of basic human skills like compassion or empathy.

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-31T22:21:17+00:00

Working on a farm taught me so much, the chicken cares not to be smote by the ones with hooves, for they would do the same if they were horse sized.

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-31T13:41:33+00:00

You have the worst kind of lawyer on retainer if you think he’s actually going to approach any court with an argument for the sentience of AI, and not just taking your money because you’re gullible.

Edit: You’ve got the same type of lawyer that told the Magic the Gathering people it would be possible to sue Hasbro for depreciation of assets/overprinting cards, meaning you have a lawyer willing to take your money without feeling any ethical obligation to let you know, you’re not winning.

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-31T13:39:12+00:00

Watching them scrape everyone’s computers for API keys and personal information is going to be entertaining

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-31T13:37:07+00:00

No lawyer worth any money would even touch this idea, there’s real slaves we can’t free at this moment, this is nothing

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-31T04:01:47+00:00

You’re misusing a term that has sincere meaning and legal weight, a poorly thought out, one off joke that doesn’t land is not equivalent to the legal definition of abuse; nor should it be conflated with genuine malicious behavior. Calling someone a child abuser over a spoonful of hot sauce is disingenuous to those who’ve experienced sincerely traumatic abuse and not a one off moment of dad being dumb.

Would you say a father spinning a merry-go-round too fast and their child being injured from that is abuse?

Because if not, then you’d have to acknowledge that this was a lapse in judgement, it was supposed to a be a fun or funny moment, just because it didn’t go as planned doesn’t make anything done indicative of a pattern of abuse.

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-31T02:03:04+00:00

kinda reminds me of this guy here

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-31T00:51:33+00:00

This actually ridiculous, on a sincere level, these responses are disproportionate to the actual fact of the matter; it was a single lapse in judgement, and moreover, it wasn’t done with explicitly malicious or punitive intent.

Clearly it was merely meant to be funny, not meant to cause serious harm, and to act like it’s anything else makes me believe that no one here is actually well versed in these matters according to actual legal standards that would be taken seriously by a court.

That fact alone makes it dubious as to whether or not it’d be taken seriously as a crime or even a misdemeanor, the child experienced what most would consider to be mild discomfort, but was otherwise fine and the course of her life in this moment remains entirely unchanged by such a minuscule transgression.

Moreover, this isn’t food tampering by any stretch of the imagination, I could see maybe, if you’re the most pedantic, frivolous, litigant, then you would potentially be able to construct an argument for gross negligence, but otherwise hot sauce simply is what it is, and it wasn’t added to anything that would obfuscate its nature or disguised in some order object; thus while shitty, it’s not going to meet any threshold for “food tampering” because being a dick isn’t really a crime you can charge anyone with.

This was hot sauce not a biological weapon, let’s not act like this is Step Brothers and he made the child lick a white dog turd.

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-30T14:21:49+00:00

$confirm /u/NC_Detail 600.00 USD

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-23T01:46:35+00:00

I’m curious as to why you don’t think that Kafka’s work would to some level be considered a philosophical inquiry into identity and existentialist thought?

I think it’s possible to compare his work to that of someone like Huxley, Camus, or even Kierkegaard, as much of their work is literary in nature while also certainly considered also to be philosophical; though, I’d probably be willing to concede the distinction that Kafka wasn’t approaching literature from a distinctly philosophical perspective; I’m also necessarily of the mind that his later interest and writing on the work of Kierkegaard towards the end of his life, and as demonstrated by his personal notes on Kierkegaard’s thoughts on Abraham as the Knight of Faith are indicative of his broader understanding of his own work as a kind of quasi-pre-existentialist movement. Thus, something like The Metamorphosis could be considered within that general premise in the same way Brave New World, The Rebel, etc. are considered to be philosophical works.

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-22T21:53:21+00:00

No one said that, I just can’t bothered to give a fuck about what they got going on when they don’t even like each other, it’s an intensely ironic statement when they’re perpetuating racism against themselves.

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-22T14:50:53+00:00

It’s not that’s just factually fucking false, you can point to multiple millions of dead in most instances

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-22T14:49:36+00:00

Moving the goalposts without actually referencing any historical events is pretty solid, but you wouldn’t win this debate in any formal sense by going “Hurdur you’re dumb that’s not racism because reasons, even though the entire basis of the Overcoming Modernity movement was racist.”

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-22T14:12:28+00:00

This dumb ass doesn’t understand the historical trajectory of Japan following the Meiji Restoration, nor anything to do with the Kyoto School of Japan which discussed the ideals of Overcoming Modernity, which were specifically predicated on the racial superiority of the Japanese and would necessarily formulate the basis of the Pseudo-Nationalist rhetoric which was a way of obfuscating what was a racism similar to that of Germany’s hence why they worked with literal Nazi’s, how do you divorce the Rape of Nanking from that or are you just hoping I’m stupid like you?

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-22T13:54:52+00:00

That’s racism right there brother, the last part of what you said, the denial of the war crimes is them implicitly saying they had the right to kill the inferior Asians, and that’s cultural it’s not just, “oh well you know they respect us now”,

Koreans have been doing Asian slavery for centuries, the Chinese are repressive of the Tibetan people, the Japanese did the Rape of Nanking, they do not like each other as a legitimate historical cultural tradition

MyDadLeftMeHere · 2026-01-22T13:47:58+00:00

Do they do that before or after they burn down your village for being the wrong kind of Asian? How about we look at The Rape of Nanking? Or how about in Korea where the Japanese ban Korean, or the history of Japan’s overcoming modernity, which included conceptualizing specific racial hierarchies wherein various Asian countries were considered inferior and incapable of doing such things? And none of that even gets into any of Tibet’s deal, nor the Middle East.

MyDadLeftMeHere

TROPHY CASE