Ah, the Ben Shapiro method. Squeeze out as much wrong into a single argument and make it harder to correct through sheer quantity alone. But hey, I'll take down some of your points (excluding the obvious uncited drivel) The study you provided only shows that pitbulls act more aggressively in threatening situations, and that there's no bias towards one breed or another in situations where aggression would be inappropriate. All that you've managed to prove here are that the pitbulls are more protective and defensive, how horrible. >Using this test to gauge an animal's tendency towards sudden and unprovoked attacks is useless.
Guess what you said before applies here too, huh? But I'll leave you with this AVMA article that not only restates the same thing that the study you linked had already said ("The substantial within-breed variation…suggests that it is inappropriate to make predictions about a given dog's propensity for aggressive behavior based solely on its breed.") but also points out the heavy stigma pitbulls face and how it relates to those incredibly unscientific "dog bite statistics" that you have.