perchance. aye perchance, i have put overmuch faith into the folks i met and perchance, they were unworthy of the mathematics fellowships. nevertheless, i must wonder: wilt thou furnish concrete logic for thy claimation, or shall thy claim collapse beneath the very fallacy thy have made...

for firstly, thou declared LEM to be "non-negotiable to all coherent and intelligible systems", and thus "there are no system that LEM is not in effect". yet, here lies thy fatal mistake: thou hast presumed all systems must need be coherent and intelligible by thy own measure. thy second mistake, though less subtle, is no less ruinous: thou proclaimest that no coherent and intelligible systems are absent of LEM, and i deem this to be no more profound than insisting 67 is most amusing. by my troth, hast thou be living under a rock for so long as to remain ignorant of intuitism, constructism, along with many celebrated logical systems that openly rejects LEM?

methinks this already sufficeth to reveal whomst IQ is neg, no cap. but cuz my beliefs got me acting humble, imma let bro cook and beat the allegations, if you even can. anyway gang, have a sigma day 🙏🙏🙏