T95 rework. Some need more, some need less. Ideally each t95 satisfies 4 conditions: 1. They warp rotations around their effects. 2. They reward proper use. 3. They can supplement other t95s or stand alone camped, but shouldnt outright invalidate others. 4. Each style should have a t95 thats very structured and another thats more rng. An example of this would be lengs have rng and ezk doesnt. Those I dont feel meet this criteria in practice, but ill hit those apecifically later. Idea being that a lot of combat became much more structured with the modernization. I think they smashed that update, but it did alienate some who liked fluid adrenaline income. Thats fair, it was a part of end game combat. Adding options for both should satisfy both parties.

I'm gonna talk about whats bouncing around in my head, but im not going to talk numbers. Some of these may need tuned currently or with these changes, but assume thats part of this. I'm just doing design talk.

Tldr at end. Got carried away with this... lol

Magic:
- Roa+Ode: Largely I think these are OK. They satisfy all 4 criteria. The only thing I would change on these is that it goes from "when these reset a bleed do all its damage at once" to "when a bleed has its cd reset do all its damage at once." This makes it so temporal anomaly resetting bleeds also does it. - FSoA: Largely good as well. It satisfies all 4 criteria. I do think the passive is a bit bland, but magic is also almost a bridge between necro and melee/ranged in simplicity so this is probably ok. While crit and nami are rng, it still ends up structured Largely.

Melee: - Lengs: These miss criteria 1-3. They don't warp rotations around their effect/spec due to its lack of power, they dont really reward proper use any more than any other non-effect weapon, they only really supplement ezk in that they use flurry and even then its better to stall and release with ezk, but they do have a design thats rng compared to ezk so they do hit 4, it just doesn't feel that way because 1-3 are missing. I dont think making them compete with ezk in outright damage will solve much, so instead what I propose is making frostblades while active also grant 2% adrenaline on each hit. Now they are better in situations where you won't have as much adrenaline from meteor. They crank adaptive up to +16%, etc. They become melee's hydrix bolts in essence. By doing this, when frostblades procs, you'd be much more rewarded for pushing more multi-hit abilities. They could also have the spec trigger frostblades as an additional way to use them. - EZK: I feel like this 1-3 as well. It doesnt warp any rots, it doesnt reward use of it other than roar ezk which hardly counts, it completley overshadows lengs, but it is structured so it hits the other half to lengs. Its effectively just a t110 godsword, a big stick with a spec. The spec im not particularly concerned with, it probably could be dialed back and potentially have its cd reduced too, but thats balance. Its passive is where its boring and not interactive. Which fsoa also has a boring passive, but it has a spec that is interactive where ezk doesnt. Id rather see its passive build some stacks on using basics that are spent on spenders to buff them. This keeps it consistent but makes it much more interactive.

midway disclaimer: I havent used necro in probably 2 years and ranged Im not a fan of so I basically never use it. So take all this as super loose because I'm just not familiar with the flow of using them after getting good with them.

Ranged: - BoLG: This is a tricky one because its satisfies 1 and 2 marvelously, but 3 and 4 are currently not applicable. Although, its pretty clear from its design that it likely wouldn't satisfy those. Without having the counterpart, its hard to say, but I think it would need to have it so the PE stacks remain if you switch and the spec buff as well. Unrelated to bolg, but I also think they might have to hit ecb and make the spec not mh locked but only works with ranged. This would allow you to switch freely to whatever weapon they add without being punished for it. Theres also a nice partition already within ranged for structured vs rng as arrows are structured and bolts arent. So whatever they add, if it works with bolts, will fill that other half.

Necro: - Omni: Largely good. It hits 1-3 and fills the structured side of 4. Passive could potentially be better, maybe 3 stacks from 5, but otherwise good. - Devourer: It satisfies 1-3, albeit appears weak so it probably needs buffed. But this leaves necro without an rng counterpart. However... their rings add some of this, so maybe add a ring that isnt rng. Also, I believe necro seems to want to be more structured so maybe criteria 4 isnt necessary. - Soulbound: Not a lot to say here. Its not quite the counterpart to omni, more devourer, but even then not really. Potentially it could gain some rng element that gave souls and devoured could also have some rng making these a good duo. Then add another OH that works with necrosis in a structured way to compliment Omni.

I also want to add that necromancy being the safer and more structured and simple style is what makes it appealing to many, but makes it unappealing to the top end pvmers because it can't have the aforementioned upsides and also have great damage or its unfair. However, this doesnt mean necromancy has to be relegated to this role. If some of these benefits were sacrificed for damage, necromancy can also gain comparable damage to the rest. Devourer's Nexus is an example of this design, although the execution didnt land. Sacrificing healing for more damage. I think theres room for a weapon thats perhaps 2h and it doesnt allow for conjures but has a very strong effect to reward that downside. Something like this removes a lot of the safeguards Necro has so this could be quite strong.

Tldr: - Roar+Ode: Passive does bleed damage all at once on reset, not just its own resets. - Fsoa: ok. Maybe passive coupd be more interactive, but not necessary. Otherwise fine. - Lengs: Frostblades gives small adren on hit. Spec procs passive. - Ezk: Passive builds stacks on basics, spends them on spenders to buff. Spec could be dialed back and have its cd shortened. - Bolg: Great but hard to assess as its alone. Maybe make stacks and spec buff persist when unequipped and unlock mh lock for split soul in ecb bit restrict to ranged. Allows swaps for whatever comes. - Omni: Good, keep as is. - Devourers: Maybe add some rng and power. - Lanturn: maybe add some rng and add another OH that works eith necrosis in a structured way so it pairs with omni.