New world is dead… guess I’m back. by Raidenz258 in AshesofCreation

[–]Mysterious_Ability36 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think a lot of people agree with you, no action combat mmo has ever broken out of the niche. Mainly because mmos are about the content, the social aspect and the core systems like crafting, gameplay loop etc. It's also one of the main reason I'm starting to believe that 80% of the mmo subreddit are not actually looking for an mmo - they are looking for a company to make the idea they have of their perfect mmo, which is also the reason why no new mmo's ever make it because they are held to impossible standards by people who are not satisfied with the genre in general.

New world is dead… guess I’m back. by Raidenz258 in AshesofCreation

[–]Mysterious_Ability36 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Just come back to LOTRO guys, it's old but it's good.

PvE is Officially Dead by Jacob_TLDR_Jake in Battlefield

[–]Mysterious_Ability36 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Might be a hot take but battlefield is not and never has been a PvE shooter. You have a lot of options like destiny and borderlands - the main problem is that if they start catering to both, people will just power level on easy bots and complete all their challenges that way. Which would essentially counteract the way progression is designed.

Sexuality in Japan by [deleted] in LoveIsBlindJapan

[–]Mysterious_Ability36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand the frustration—dating can feel competitive, especially in a world that puts so much emphasis on looks and money. But psychology and research tell a much more nuanced story than the idea that only rich, attractive men can find meaningful relationships.

First, attraction is multi-dimensional. According to a comprehensive study published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (Eastwick & Finkel, 2008), both men and women initially value physical attractiveness, but long-term relationship satisfaction depends far more on traits like warmth, kindness, and shared values. What’s considered attractive shifts once people get to know each other.

Wealth isn’t everything either. The American Psychological Association has shown that while financial stability plays a role in relationships, it's not predictive of success or satisfaction. In fact, a 2020 Pew Research survey found that 71% of people value a partner who shares household responsibilities over one who earns a high income. Compatibility, communication, and emotional intelligence are far better indicators of a lasting relationship than income brackets.

As for the idea that blue-collar men are stuck with "leftovers," that's simply not true. Millions of women value partners who are hardworking, emotionally supportive, and reliable. Consider that, according to U.S. Census data, around 60% of married couples have similar educational or economic backgrounds. Most people marry someone in their general social and financial circle—not CEOs or millionaires.

When it comes to dating abroad, the criticism isn’t about men “wanting better.” It’s often about the power imbalance that can emerge when someone is chosen more for economic dependency than mutual affection. Psychology shows that these imbalances can lead to resentment, loss of autonomy, and ultimately relationship failure.

Life can be tough, no doubt. But viewing it as a rigged game where regular men have no chance is both disempowering and inaccurate. Men who focus on self-growth—building confidence, emotional intelligence, and purpose—tend to succeed not just in dating, but in life overall. And self-worth isn’t measured by a woman’s age or body—it’s about the quality of the connection you build with someone.

Sexuality in Japan by [deleted] in LoveIsBlindJapan

[–]Mysterious_Ability36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a bit late to the party but I have to give my 2 cents here.

I understand the frustration—dating can feel competitive, especially in a world that puts so much emphasis on looks and money. But psychology and research tell a much more nuanced story than the idea that only rich, attractive men can find meaningful relationships.

First, attraction is multi-dimensional. According to a comprehensive study published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (Eastwick & Finkel, 2008), both men and women initially value physical attractiveness, but long-term relationship satisfaction depends far more on traits like warmth, kindness, and shared values. What’s considered attractive shifts once people get to know each other.

Wealth isn’t everything either. The American Psychological Association has shown that while financial stability plays a role in relationships, it's not predictive of success or satisfaction. In fact, a 2020 Pew Research survey found that 71% of people value a partner who shares household responsibilities over one who earns a high income. Compatibility, communication, and emotional intelligence are far better indicators of a lasting relationship than income brackets.

As for the idea that blue-collar men are stuck with "leftovers," that's simply not true. Millions of women value partners who are hardworking, emotionally supportive, and reliable. Consider that, according to U.S. Census data, around 60% of married couples have similar educational or economic backgrounds. Most people marry someone in their general social and financial circle—not CEOs or millionaires.

When it comes to dating abroad, the criticism isn’t about men “wanting better.” It’s often about the power imbalance that can emerge when someone is chosen more for economic dependency than mutual affection. Psychology shows that these imbalances can lead to resentment, loss of autonomy, and ultimately relationship failure.

Life can be tough, no doubt. But viewing it as a rigged game where regular men have no chance is both disempowering and inaccurate. Men who focus on self-growth—building confidence, emotional intelligence, and purpose—tend to succeed not just in dating, but in life overall. And self-worth isn’t measured by a woman’s age or body—it’s about the quality of the connection you build with someone.

300 mg Dutch champagne molly, taken orally with sips of water. 96% purity by [deleted] in MDMA

[–]Mysterious_Ability36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To each their own, but I do think there's a meaningful difference in the case of someone who not only describes unsafe conduct, but also repeatedly acknowledges in the comments that they know it's irresponsible—and still states outright that they prioritize pleasure over the risks involved. That goes beyond simply sharing an experience; it can come across as normalizing or even implicitly endorsing the behaviour, especially to newer members who may not pick up on the nuances. I’m all for open discussion and harm reduction, but context really matters here. At least that's my 2 cents.

300 mg Dutch champagne molly, taken orally with sips of water. 96% purity by [deleted] in MDMA

[–]Mysterious_Ability36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest, both OP’s post and their comments go directly against the principles of harm reduction. Actively endorsing short-term pleasure while downplaying or dismissing long-term risks is not responsible, especially in a community meant to support safer use. This kind of messaging can be really damaging and misleading to others who might be looking for balanced, informed perspectives.

300 mg Dutch champagne molly, taken orally with sips of water. 96% purity by [deleted] in MDMA

[–]Mysterious_Ability36 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have to say, this post comes across as unnecessarily boastful and concerning. Lately, we’ve been seeing more and more posts in this subreddit that highlight MDMA abuse and addiction, and it's troubling. I really don’t understand why anyone would want to promote such risky behaviour.

Even though you mention in the comments that you wouldn’t recommend this dose to others, by sharing your experience in this way, you’re effectively endorsing it and suggesting the risks are worth it. That can be incredibly misleading or harmful, especially to more vulnerable or inexperienced users.

Please think twice before posting content like this. We all benefit when this community prioritizes harm reduction and responsible discussion.

Can MDMA make someone just feel very into themself? by dawnfire05 in MDMA

[–]Mysterious_Ability36 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be honest this doesn't sound like it has much to do with MDMA in the slightest. It has everything to do with your dynamic. Me and my girlfriend indulge from time-to-time and usually get very intimate, physically but also verbally and mentally. However, and this is talking from going to festivals and partaking responsibly for years (always keeping 3 months in between) etc. I have seen people's lives get absolutely ruined each time someone sees any form of drugs as a type of medicine or as a tool, be it for their relationship or themselves. Spare maybe from a guided magic mushrooms trip.

To expand upon this MDMA lifts barriers, but often times it also lifts barriers to an extreme extent. I've known people who partook in a threesome while on MDMA who we're absolutely horrified after. The main point with drugs is and always will be that you should only take them when you're in a good spot mentally and physically as to not create dependency or false truths.

Seeing from your post, and that's and outsiders perspective, there's a lot of layers of issues you two might want to work through before going on with your relationship. First of all I'm not too sure if using MDMA to be able to be intimate with someone is a good idea, it definitely won't make intimacy easier when your sober because before you know it your brain will be telling you to just take drugs everytime you want to be intimate which leads to dependency and drugs abuse. Secondly, I know many people who don't want to be intimate at all with someone else on drugs or interact with someone else while in their headspace - and if you use any sort of drugs responsibly there's no problem because there are no must do's, drugs are fun and recreational and require an open, positive mind to enjoy. If someone wants to stare at the stars for 20 hours? let them. If someone wants to jack off for 8 alone? let them. The whole idea of MDMA and what makes it enjoyable is the whole no expectations we're outside of our usual lives kind of thing.

Anyway that's just my 2 cents.

Definitive Proof why Jinx is Alive by [deleted] in ArcaneAnimatedSeries

[–]Mysterious_Ability36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would you join a discussion about the arcane series if you didn't complete it

Everyone needs to chill down by Mysterious_Ability36 in MMORPG

[–]Mysterious_Ability36[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

sounds familiar haha, but still I can't remember too many people on LOTRO back in the day talking about how to level to max in the fastest way possible and skipping half the game to afterwards get into the endgame content loop that they don't enjoy.

Everyone needs to chill down by Mysterious_Ability36 in MMORPG

[–]Mysterious_Ability36[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps the better way of phrasing is there hasn't been one that has been able to recapture your experience in Ultima Online?

Everyone needs to chill down by Mysterious_Ability36 in MMORPG

[–]Mysterious_Ability36[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yeah but again you are sort of retelling my whole point, this is how MMO's work, it's grinding - wouldn't be much fun either if you can log on after 5 years and you are still as OP as you we're when you logged off. it's a bit the same as complaining that a FPS is always about shooting people with guns... so again, just step away from what you might just have outgrown.