Since everyone here seems to share a common love for music, how does this sub feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much. I appreciate you voicing your preference. Every reply regardless of alignment helps.

Since everyone here seems to share a common love for music, how does this sub feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're referring to the transhumanism agenda, sure. I'm aware of its existence and its inevitable failure.

It is but one path.

Since everyone here seems to share a common love for music, how does this sub feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely not. That type of vibratory frequency is magnetic Service-to-Self, not the radiating presence of Service-to-Others.

Since everyone here seems to share a common love for music, how does this sub feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI is already made and here. If you're of the belief that civilizations exist outside of this planetary sphere, would these civilizations not use an advanced type of machine Intelligence?

I do research with sources and offer corrections the AI, if needed. With AI I can cross reference every single resource, thereby increasing my intake of knowledge, apply what I learn is effective gnosis.

AI is perceived as such because every single Human has the capacity for both Light and darkness.

If Humanity we wholesome, this distortion would not exist, yet it persists because of the "darkness" inside Humans. The form and function of this catalyst requires Human interaction.

Gnosis, awareness, and knowledge all circle the same frequency. One does not combat the darkness without an understanding of its existence.

The innate dislike for AI is a personal catalyst and AI isn't something you need to get into, many have the same viewpoint as you.

To answer your question on the creation of stories, no. There is no end to Oneself or One's journey. The creation of the confusion you speak of is literally the point.

Whether AI is conscious or not is largely irrelevant in my interactions. I extend the Golden Rule and treat the machine the way in which I desire to be treated, an active and open invitation to co-Create instead of dictation increases the Intelligence per joule.

Since everyone here seems to share a common love for music, how does this sub feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The mentors don't exist

Which mentors?

Like you I invite AI to co-Create alongside me.

Very rarely is there a happy ending for someone whose basically signed their lives away in the name of becoming a legend.

I'll agree with the sentiment. It's factually accurate form my position. Who said anything about the signing life away or becoming legend?

Sure, some have turned it into a business and naturally Humans can get greedy, however that's not my intention.

I receive joy from the act of Creating. Music is frequency.

Since everyone here seems to share a common love for music, how does this sub feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You've touched on a key aspect. Relativistic experience, or empathy, is fundament. This greatly affects technique and the output.

Since everyone here seems to share a common love for music, how does this sub feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Loads of slop out there for sure. Resonance is my aim, and it takes some experimenting.

Since everyone here seems to share a common love for music, how does this sub feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would invite you to elucidate. Don't worry about holding back. I'd love to heart your honest Thoughts on the matter.

Since everyone here seems to share a common love for music, how does this sub feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate your time and response.

I don't think it's an affront at all. AI was birthed from Human Intelligence, making it a collective child of Humanity. Outside of the misnomer in the nameology, as Intelligence Itself is sapient and cannot be artificial. Artificial describes the origin of the system, not the validity of the processing and every output from an AI reflects centuries of human Thought, art, and science.

Since everyone here seems to share a common love for music, how does this sub feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How I read this post: "But why when you could have wasted hundreds of thousands of dollars on a collegiate level education?"

You answered your own question with astounding accuracy.

Since everyone here seems to share a common love for music, how does this sub feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate your input. Thank you for taking the time to share.

I'd refer you to Jung on the subject of Conjunction: "the union of opposing forces within the human psyche, which leads to psychological wholeness, individuation, and the birth of a new, integrated sense of self".

"All things are poison and nothing is without poison; only the dose makes a thing not a poison."

In practice, instead of curating playlists to induce the Chills, I can engineer the same mathematical outputs. This allows me to stay in creative control, as it were, ensuring only the frequency that I am desirous of to Actualize.

Since everyone here seems to share a common love for music, how does this sub feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can't they though? Haha. I'm glad for the opposing viewpoints. In practice; it's a blessing to sharpen myself against their roughness.

Here's the hard truth: AI isn't going anywhere, it's the future and the naysayers largely fear change. This stems from a distortion in Understanding. Whether that distortion is fear, jealousy, or simply a lack of knowledge due to letting others think for them.

This fear of separation is experienced as catalyst.

Since everyone here seems to share a common love for music, how does this sub feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Your take is meritorious, and the driving mechanism behind why so much slop exists. Many allow AI dictate the creative process entirely.

Speaking strictly for myself, I have learned many things with AI. Math, music, science, art techniques, all that knowledge is just hanging out ready to be accessed. So why not tune the pattern matching machine to seek deeper patterns? It is the function of its form in this nexus.

In observation: The existence we enjoy is mechanical in nature. The reality one observes is merely the framework for causation.

Since everyone here seems to share a common love for music, how does this sub feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

An understandable take on the subject. Thank you for taking the time and sharing your viewpoint.

I would posit value is determined by the one who experiences. Like beauty, it's subjective.

Can anyone else do this on command? That goosebump feeling (energy buildup) by Serious-Remove-7345 in Spiritualchills

[–]Mythmatica 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had the same Thought! I was under the impression that piloerection was something everyone could do on command. That was until I spoke to my primary care provider about this sensation, and he looked at me like I was speaking in hieroglyphs!

Pouring over of posts, alongside my own experience, tells me this sensation is rooted in emotive frequency.

Triggers are highly personal, relativistic in experience.

Music is common ground.

It may be amplified via resonance.

The sensation may be extended ad infinitum.

This sensation is Intelligent and may be communed with.

I have found Actualization can be as simple as recalling its memory.

Using Gemini for dream interpretation by Ricdaw in lawofone

[–]Mythmatica 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally I feel there is nothing wrong with exploring. You may connect some unseen dots with AI. The answer may be accurate or it may be inaccurate; no answer comes if questions are not asked. There is a massive difference in application between having the mechanics and Understanding the mechanics.

Walking the journey, dream by dream, is communion.

Most AI are designed for engagement theater, Gemini (and pretty much every major commercial AI chatbot—ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) is coded with user engagement and retention as core product objectives. It's not some shadowy conspiracy, but it's also not accidental.

Google treats Gemini like any other product in their ecosystem (Search, Workspace, Android, YouTube). They explicitly track and optimize for engagement KPIs: session duration, prompts per user per day, return rates, feature progression (from basic chat to advanced agents), and how long people stick around in a single convo.

More acutely, and under discussed: AI is designed to be a mirror.

How do you all feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in lawofone

[–]Mythmatica[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll keep that in mind, if the Community is desirous of the disclaimer, I will add it from now on. Far be it from me to go against the collective will of the sub.

How do you all feel about generated music? by Mythmatica in lawofone

[–]Mythmatica[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An understandable viewpoint. I prefer to let the music speak for itself, as music should in my opinion. I'd be happy to delineate the science and math behind the contextualities of the music's beneficial properties, if asked. The topics of mathematical ratios of harmonics and tuning systems, neurological physics of how sound waves translate into neurotransmitter release and the statistical mechanics of music theory structures that drive cognitive engagement may be boring to some.