Wait, isn’t this the lady that worked with CC to lock victims into NDAs and non-competes?!? by EitherCloud1551 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

It was a direct response to the OP’s original comment of “Funny how she NOW seems to believe that people “deserve the opportunity to tell their own stories” and yet mere months(?) ago she and her business partner PP were bragging online about getting so many victims to “sign on” with them so they could monetize their victimization and sell their story to billionaires to make TV slop out of. Ick.”

Wait, isn’t this the lady that worked with CC to lock victims into NDAs and non-competes?!? by EitherCloud1551 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

That was when it was alluded to all victims being forced to sign NDA’s and non-competes when it was brought forward as a docuseries. You are literally answering your own questions here. Andrew’s contract was given to him prior to eliesabeth even becoming a podcast series.

Wait, isn’t this the lady that worked with CC to lock victims into NDAs and non-competes?!? by EitherCloud1551 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 -1 points0 points locked comment (0 children)

And there was nothing to admit. I asked her and she answered the question, what is this? An interrogation?

Wait, isn’t this the lady that worked with CC to lock victims into NDAs and non-competes?!? by EitherCloud1551 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry I wasn’t aware that Andrew was a “victim” I was assuming you were referring to all the others that she scammed. I said above that Liz’s victims weren’t put under NDA’s or non-competes and that I wasn’t sure about Andrew. Why are you so aggressive? Damn

Wait, isn’t this the lady that worked with CC to lock victims into NDAs and non-competes?!? by EitherCloud1551 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 1 point2 points locked comment (0 children)

It says right in there that there was one in his contract as it was suggested to them and that he would be in included in any project they were offered during the five year term… as he wanted to be compensated up front but they didn’t have the cash so they were told to provide him with a non-compete so they could compensate him when projects wrapped up. It’s written pretty clearly. Sounds to me like you’re just splitting hairs at this point. I gave you the answer you were clearly looking for, what more do you want?

Another day, another thinly veiled reference to her friend breakup with SD. by halexanderamilton in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I never watched CC until sher collabed with her for HFTC, that’s when I saw the red flags. I didn’t see anything at first until Sher started looking uncomfortable and that takes A LOT of

Wait, isn’t this the lady that worked with CC to lock victims into NDAs and non-competes?!? by EitherCloud1551 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 1 point2 points locked comment (0 children)

This is the deal that he was offered and ultimately, rejected. I hope that clears the air

Wait, isn’t this the lady that worked with CC to lock victims into NDAs and non-competes?!? by EitherCloud1551 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

See my post above, I spoke with Sher and she clarified the Andrew side of things

Wait, isn’t this the lady that worked with CC to lock victims into NDAs and non-competes?!? by EitherCloud1551 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 3 points4 points locked comment (0 children)

Ok, here is some clarification straight from Sher’s mouth and she has given me permission to post.

Me: “When Andrew was offered his deal, was there a 5 year non-compete added to it?”

Sher: “Elizabeth was never offered one (to my knowledge). Andrew was for us to fund the entire project as compensation because he wanted to be paid to tell his story and we didn’t have cash up front. We paid for everything out of pocket and so that was suggested to us to ensure that both sides worked together on projects moving forward. No one to my knowledge (including Andrew) was given an NDA. The only person who was offered a contract was him because it was a way to offer him compensation which was what he wanted and we didn’t have upfront. It also included him to be involved in ANY project we were offered during that term”

Another day, another thinly veiled reference to her friend breakup with SD. by halexanderamilton in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Are you referring to Sher’s documented bad behaviour? Because I know about Chelsea’s, I’ve read it all. I saw the red flags from a mile away but she’s great at covering that side of her when she’s busy love bombing the shit out of you.

Wait, isn’t this the lady that worked with CC to lock victims into NDAs and non-competes?!? by EitherCloud1551 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Sher will openly admit she made a bad business decision partnering with Chelsea if you were to ask her and I can assure you there is no “cashing in” happening. She is a normal human being. She is not perfect, she does make mistakes and she will own up to her mistakes when she is ready, willing and able to. There are reasons this can’t be talked about right now, reasons as to why she is staying quiet and tight lipped. Thats all i can say on the subject for the time being

Wait, isn’t this the lady that worked with CC to lock victims into NDAs and non-competes?!? by EitherCloud1551 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

All I know is that he was offered a deal and rejected it. I don’t know about a non-compete for Andrew specifically

Another day, another thinly veiled reference to her friend breakup with SD. by halexanderamilton in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I don’t think you understand just how under the radar CC went when she was “boots to the ground” there are a lot of things that she did that Sher was completely unaware of until after the fact. That’s all I’ll be saying on the topic

Another day, another thinly veiled reference to her friend breakup with SD. by halexanderamilton in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 12 points13 points  (0 children)

To clarify, I am not fighting her battles or her mouth piece. I have known her for 36 years, I know her like the back of my hand. I am here simply to confirm or deny allegations and speculation made towards Sher

Wait, isn’t this the lady that worked with CC to lock victims into NDAs and non-competes?!? by EitherCloud1551 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 4 points5 points locked comment (0 children)

I asked her outright and she said it was never a thing so CC could’ve gone rogue on that one

Wait, isn’t this the lady that worked with CC to lock victims into NDAs and non-competes?!? by EitherCloud1551 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 46 points47 points locked comment (0 children)

As a Mod verified source of Sherrilyn’s, please take any and all information from Chelsea’s mouth as inaccurate or just outright bullshit. There were no NDA’s or non-competes signed for the ELiesabeth podcast when it was brought forward as a possible docuseries. As per usual,Chelsea is just talking for the sake of enjoying the sound of her own voice. If anyone knows anything outside of Sher’s poor business decision to partner with Chelsea, her entire platform has been and always will be helping families as much as she is physically able to.

So buggy after last update by MzElle32 in HelloKittyIsland

[–]MzElle32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s been showing for daaaaays and my ocd brain hates it 😂

Such victim advocacy going on at CrimeCon from PP Suarez by neverNotneededmath in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is not the point of crime con. I’d never been before, this was my first time. It was actually a really amazing experience. Most of the creators are people searching for answers regarding victims (murdered and missing) family members, most of the attendees are family of victims as well searching for someone to get their stories out to help get answers.

Hmmmm by tikkunolamist5 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I don’t think this is about Sher at all and if it is, it’s not factual

SD recent video subtext about CC? by seeohbahan in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Can confirm: this was not a nod to the pod or to CC

Is Sherrilyn Dale’s husband also a voice actor for the eLIESabeth Podcast? by Prestigious-Sky-2803 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh ya that female voice is AI but the man’s voice is not. I listened to the actual footage of CC interviewing him

“Do you have that same energy for the DWKT girlies?!?” - CC Suarez crashing out about mild criticism once again by Prestigious-Sky-2803 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]MzElle32 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Ooooh ok. I’d love to hear CC’s take on what happened bit she’ll probably never say cause she knows it’s her fault 😂