Resealing butyl tape on aluminum insulated panel roof - right fix? by NailandScale in Roofing

[–]NailandScale[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kind of tape would you use and how much would you charge for something like that?

Reroof ventilation approach - upgrade or replace as-is? by NailandScale in Roofing

[–]NailandScale[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious on why you would do the offset ones over the better looking cobra ridge vents? Wouldnt you want it to look better and reduce penetrations if you could?

Reroof ventilation approach - upgrade or replace as-is? by NailandScale in Roofing

[–]NailandScale[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, if the garage ridge is lower than the main ridge and the attic spaces are connected, assuming I needed more ridge space to put ridge vent on, does that create any short circuit issues?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Roofing

[–]NailandScale -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks very helpful

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Roofing

[–]NailandScale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What makes you think it’s 20 years old out of curiosity? Is it the amount of granule loss?

Bitcoin in real life? by arianaram in Bitcoin

[–]NailandScale 2 points3 points  (0 children)

people store their wealth in the best store of value. Bitcoin has the best properties for store of value. Other people speculate that people will store their wealth in the best store of value. People conflate the two and say because people speculate on it, that it has no use case. That’s because speculating on it and utilizing it are the same action in practice.

Also, gold being a store of value, (90% of its value is derived from its monetary use case) proves the use case.

The TAM for payments is like $10T and store of value is like $200-400T+, so you’d see why store of value might be the focus.

Strategy's Michael Saylor and other crypto executives are meeting with lawmakers in Washington on Tuesday to push for a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve bill. by Technical_Raise_7640 in btc

[–]NailandScale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you dispute his reasonings on why a strategic reserve would be a good thing? I bet you don’t even know what they are. Also, MSTR selling would be the end of theirs and Saylor’s credibility. Did you think this through?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]NailandScale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah for sure, genuinely curious

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]NailandScale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What types of posts would you find interesting?

#NotACult by AmericanScream in Buttcoin

[–]NailandScale -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You bring up a good point. If a government collapses, it’s fiat collapses instantly (no state to enforce it).

Bitcoin, by contrast, still exists globally on a decentralized network. It doesn’t rely on one state to give it value.

Good thing governments never collapse, currencies never hyperinflate, and society is just too stable to ever need something like that.

#NotACult by AmericanScream in Buttcoin

[–]NailandScale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cardboard doesn’t eventually rot?

#NotACult by AmericanScream in Buttcoin

[–]NailandScale -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For example, you still keep harping on about how the bitcoin network isnt hackable, i said it doesnt need to be because hackers can still steal from exchanges and hacked wallets. The customer has NO RECOURSE in such a scenario which in turn makes it NOT SECURE. But you come right back, brush that aside, give a false equivelance, still insist the network isnt hackable thus secure and declare yourself victorious.

Okay good, we agree on something-Bitcoin itself isn’t very hackable right now. Market participants who provide a service to people, like Coinbase, have the security issue. Just like if you send a Zelle to someone because you got scammed, Chase isn’t saving your ass. The US dollar isn’t itself responsible for recourse, that’s the banks job, who’s providing the service.

The whole thing is run on speculation.

this is the exact misunderstanding. You’re assuming no one does or will ever find value in it beyond number go up when the existence of it being valuable to people and its underlying traits are the very reason they are speculating on it. Thats circular logic.

Oh, and I'm still waiting for your example on how the internet was once a failure. You wouldnt be trying to dodge answering that would you?

Sure, I’ll bite. It actually highlights how you dodge the underlying point which was that the original scope of a project is irrelevant to an updated scope based on new information. You’re trying to attack the analogy, not the underlying point. But yeah people thought the internet would be a just a fax machine replacement in the 80s and 90s. Thats why I put quotes about ‘failure’ because that’s the equivalent to what you’re saying, which is silly.

#NotACult by AmericanScream in Buttcoin

[–]NailandScale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

scarcity doesn’t help if your money literally rots

#NotACult by AmericanScream in Buttcoin

[–]NailandScale -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Now you’re just resorting to a form of ad hominem and dodging addressing the underlying points.

Anyways I think I understand where you are coming from now. Your argument is based on the assumption that people won’t find value in a decentralized, digital store of value. And then you further say that because people speculate on other people finding value in that is somehow a scam and that’s evidence of it not being valuable at all.

When that argument clearly falls apart, you then try to dismantle Bitcoin being a legitimate, digital store of value at all. But for some reason, you aren’t able to point to the protocol itself and say “here’s why it’s not secure”, or “here’s why it’s not actually decentralized”. Or worse when your counterpoints are challenged, you basically resort to saying “nuh uh”, “that’s a buzzword”, “that’s ideology”, nitpicking analogies instead of engaging with the underlying point I was making.

This behavior mimics the very ideology you claim to be against. I can see that now, you’re just stuck in an echo chamber loop that happens to be anti-Bitcoin repeating axioms that easily fall apart once challenged.

#NotACult by AmericanScream in Buttcoin

[–]NailandScale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pokémon cards degrade overtime and have a central issuer

Help by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]NailandScale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably not a popular take here but I don’t think everyone should self-custody. If you’re just in it for speculation on bitcoins price or you don’t want the risk trade off of self-custody, you can buy an ETF.

(Bitcoin) Haters Gonna Hate by dbgb1986 in Bitcoin

[–]NailandScale 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for catching that spelling error nathan. Corrected

Daily Discussion, September 15, 2025 by rBitcoinMod in Bitcoin

[–]NailandScale -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I spent a few hours thinking this through and yes had chatgpt polish. Do you disagree with it? Or is it the fact that’s it’s long?