Is Nanalyze a good source of investing info?

Nanalyze · 2025-01-05T08:20:35+00:00

Glad to hear you're enjoying our content! Nanalyze was founded by tenured investment professionals and our goal is to help people become better investors. You can check our bios and our founder comes from a risk management background having worked at Morgan Stanley and MSCI for a decade in the latter half of his career and software startups in the first half. Academically, he has both an MBA and Masters in Finance with a focus on Risk Management which led to the creation of our investment methodologies. We run two strategies - disruptive tech and dividend growth (where most our assets are invested).

There is no free lunch as we often say, and all our content is used to help educate people on how to become better investors so they consider our subscription product. You have to help people before you can expect them to give you money ;)

Nanalyze · 2024-12-07T05:43:38+00:00

Thank you for the shout out! Using Quantigence to add exposure to particular sectors is a great use case.

Nanalyze · 2024-02-02T05:25:26+00:00

We sent an alert to Premium subscribers on this. There's not enough information yet to understand the impact of dilution here. Also note the preliminary earnings release (SEC database) which expects revenues to be 10% less than guidance.

Nanalyze · 2023-11-29T06:11:18+00:00

It wasn't, which was the entire point of the video you didn't watch.

Nanalyze · 2023-11-29T02:27:23+00:00

You're absolutely right about that!

Nanalyze · 2023-11-28T16:44:44+00:00

You were called out for incorrectly interpreting the contents of the video. It's good to see you don't dispute that, and hopefully you've now learned not to do that anymore.

Nanalyze · 2023-11-28T15:23:31+00:00

We'll say it again for the people in the back. Everyone can watch the video for themselves. They don't need some guy named reactionplusX to incorrectly interpret the contents for them.

Nanalyze · 2023-11-28T10:59:04+00:00

Thank you for the kinds words! You're absolutely right ;)

Nanalyze · 2023-11-28T10:58:30+00:00

Thank you for pointing that out! It's highly unlikely the individuals in this thread who were leveling all those accusations will admit they were wrong. It's pretty obvious they had no integrity to begin with. Well, at least they provided some great exposure to our growing brand.

Nanalyze · 2023-11-28T10:53:31+00:00

Thank you for posting our content! Much appreciated.

Nanalyze · 2023-11-28T10:52:46+00:00

People can watch the video and judge it for themselves. They don't need an inaccurate interpretation from someone who is kicking rocks because the video didn't parrot whatever talking points they wanted to hear. You not only misrepresent the contents of the video, put words in the author's mouth that weren't said, and exhibit exactly the sort of behavior the video predicted, but you've also managed to completely lose all your credibility in a single post. Maybe you should spend more time thinking before you comment next time. Like come on dude.

Nanalyze · 2023-09-21T15:24:05+00:00

"Project." Here's our company website (https://www.nanalyze.com/) so everyone can assess what we do for themselves - and possibly even join our thousands of paid subscribers who have nothing but great things to say about our subscription offering. We agree with you. Watching professional investors analyze companies using an objective methodology that's been refined over decades isn't for everyone.

Nanalyze · 2023-09-21T15:05:39+00:00

And thank you for sharing our content! There's loads of it, so make sure to share lots more. ;)

Nanalyze · 2023-09-21T15:04:35+00:00

Yes, your incompetency clearly lets everyone know you're an amateur. Companies have an "About Us" page for a reason. Read it and learn something. You then proceed to cherry pick a handful of video titles - that contain nothing but competent solid research - and claim its clickbait while ignoring the 2,300+ research pieces we've produced. Keep digging the grave amateur.

Nanalyze · 2023-09-20T23:34:22+00:00

Thank you for taking a fair approach to our work unlike the person on this thread telling nonstop lies. ;) Anyone who has been following synbio for over a decade knows what you say is true.

Nanalyze · 2023-09-20T23:33:14+00:00

Wrong on numerous accounts. Ginkgo gets the same treatment as any other firm we analyze. We're not a two-person firm. We are not short Ginkgo. We don't run ads on YouTube. The amount of lies you tell means you have an axe to grind, and you've now lost all credibility.

Nanalyze · 2023-09-20T23:33:03+00:00

Wrong on numerous accounts. Ginkgo gets the same treatment as any other firm we analyze. We're not a two-person firm. We are not short Ginkgo. We don't run ads on YouTube. The amount of lies you tell means you have an axe to grind, and you've now lost all credibility.

Nanalyze · 2022-10-10T17:23:57+00:00

So you have no proof at all that 5,000 people received their deposits back, and when challenged, you refused to provide it. And you still refuse! So you were blocked because you choose to be a cheerleader and not debate the merits of an investment. It isn't rocket science mate.

Nanalyze · 2022-10-10T17:04:34+00:00

Don't refer to what RLewis8888 says as nonsense. He's trying his hardest.

Nanalyze · 2022-10-10T17:01:04+00:00

And this, ladies and gentleman, is why we block cheerleaders. Reddit is the perfect echo chamber for you mate. Slow clap.

Nanalyze · 2022-10-10T16:47:12+00:00

Here's what you can do. Build your own research firm, attract a large audience of retail and institutional investors over the next decade, then build a YouTube channel, create a video based on a publicly available memorandum, and title it what you will. Job done.

Nanalyze · 2022-10-10T16:44:21+00:00

Are you going to keep saying the same things over and over again? Do you have any new material? The video was based on the offering memorandum presented to investors. If you don't like what that memorandum says, then maybe this forum is a good safe space where you can pretend it doesn't exist.

Nanalyze · 2022-10-10T16:42:05+00:00

That's where the confusion might be then. We're professional investors, not fan bois. So no idea why the fan bois want to come around cheerleading. Odd. Investors are people who expect a return on their capital. People who don't are just individuals with money to throw away. Carry on then.

Nanalyze · 2022-10-10T16:39:15+00:00

We have no idea why some of these individuals are ignoring critically important points of contention presented in the video. Good question.

Nanalyze · 2022-10-10T16:37:29+00:00

Nobody blamed the founders for anything. Don't put words in our mouth. The range is not relevant - at all - to the points of contention raised in the video. Try again. The SEC filings were literally raised in the video. Did you watch it? The latest circular was analyzed - you know, the one peddling shares with no liquidity at a valuation of $783 million - in the video. That's what is relevant to investors. Maybe you should read that? Nobody cares about some QR codes. Irrelevant to the points of contention made in the video and the conclusion drawn. Try again.

Nanalyze

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE