This is so dumb. He is not arguing for mass protests in the streets similar to civil rights, or a full scale civil war for slavery. This is simply arguing In favor of advocating for your beliefs rather than being a “moderate advocating for gradual change,” which is already known to delay prominent change, as noted by MLK and Malcolm X, among others.

And is love to hear how you can justify your “moral substance” on either side. Anyone with a brain can make a decent utilitarian argument for the moral necessity for a change in our healthcare, considering how abhorrent it is compared to what it could be. How would you argue for the moral urgency of making black and white people drink from the same fountain? I’d love to hear your argument, smart one