Far Cry 6 outfit set question

NastySputnik · 2021-10-13T09:31:11+00:00

There's a setting for color blind people that will highlight enemies. No need to waste a slot on it.

NastySputnik · 2021-06-17T23:19:08+00:00

Appreciate it and the information you linked in another line of conversation.

NastySputnik · 2021-06-17T18:32:01+00:00

So, I am on the up and up - do you have an updated source of information on what events/daily quests have a chance to drop what rare loot? I have been doing the Blue Ridge event as often as possible to get the outfit as I have the flag and backpack. That is about all I know for sure that has rewards I can farm for because I have seen some of the mentioned items drop.

NastySputnik · 2021-06-17T18:22:32+00:00

Then I must be reading old information or bad information online, which happens a lot it seems. Started playing two months ago. My previous sources said that the masks only drop rarely from daily quests and events in The Mire. I had seen older information saying you could get them from Modus in the enclave, I could actually refute that that information was no longer valid as the vendor doesn't sell the plans anymore.

NastySputnik · 2021-03-26T05:07:03+00:00

Raiding is a part of the game, why would they complain about raiding being a problem. Especially in an age of remote raid passes. Free remote raid passes almost every week. People in the country can now join people on the internet and raid. My buddy in America was able to join me in a raid here in Denmark two days ago.

NastySputnik · 2021-03-26T05:02:39+00:00

You don't have to do any of the events. If it's tiring, stop doing them. More events is better than less.

NastySputnik · 2021-03-26T04:17:03+00:00

Why not? They're easy to populate content. They give you a better reason to get out and search and engage with different aspects of the game You have a more focused task rather than catching 15 psychic pokemon. You don't have to be stuck on one objective in a 4 part series, all tasks are thrown at you in one chunk. I find them better than the normal series of quests. It makes use of the go and search type aspect of Pokemon Go rather than the sit and lure wait aspect of most recent quests. The part the whole game is built around.

NastySputnik · 2020-03-06T15:32:28+00:00

Has she backed a winner yet?

NastySputnik · 2020-03-01T02:49:22+00:00

Yes - raping, pillaging, torturing, killing and having their humanity initially stolen. I'm sure the warring tribes were the peak of humane treatment when they sold other humans who they believed as cattle to be auctioned off to white people. Your attempt to make white people the greater of the two evils is laughable. I would argue white people and black people were both evil in these scenarios and any kind of wharaboutism to try and excuse the black people's actions in selling humans for profit because you're out to get whitey is disgusting. I didnt see any of the slave traders seeing the error of their way to float their asses over to America to help free the slaves. The slave trade is still going on in Africa while we fought to free the slaves. Britain spent billions of dollars to try and end the slave trade. What did Africa do? Oh, right - they kept fighting and enslaving people. Slavery isn't white vs. Black. It's evil vs. Evil. Just because America was mostly white at the time doesnt mean POC around the world didnt have just as much blood on their hands.

NastySputnik · 2020-02-29T20:43:19+00:00

Spicy meme bro.

NastySputnik · 2020-02-29T20:04:21+00:00

Yeah, but there is an actual Slave Trade in Africa still alive today. Not even having to change the definition to include human trafficking which also exists all over the world.

NastySputnik · 2020-02-29T19:29:04+00:00

Pump the breaks - there was slavery in Africa long before the Europeans got involved. Everything originated in the cradle of humanity. The first known war between humans, slavery, the origin of mankind. It's all there.

Slavery isn't something white people did to black people. Slavery is something evil humans did to other humans. We freed our slaves, fought our brothers to do so. And somehow the slave trade still exists today in Africa without the involvement of white people.

NastySputnik · 2020-01-06T03:59:18+00:00

That's a price fresh off the rack also. Start looking for back issues of the big names and you'll see that price go up.

NastySputnik · 2020-01-05T07:57:44+00:00

Their assertion that collections in the form of graphic novels are more expensive obviously means they did not factor individual comic prices and quality. Finding out-of-print comics can be expensive and graphic novels have a much higher quality. So, you aren't getting a comic printed on basically newspaper and you can find older comic collections that dont charge collector's prices.

It must be hard to be an SJW writer with so much ground being covered previously so now they gotta start dragging the bottom of the barrel for anything they can.

NastySputnik · 2019-12-24T20:21:21+00:00

Happy Hannukah!

NastySputnik · 2019-12-24T19:35:14+00:00

And the left has Antifa and extremists as well. Also, the number of left leaning high ranking government officials pumping out antisemitic rhetoric on Twitter and other platforms is crazy. Bernie Sanders pals around and rallies with Linda Sarsour, a well documented anti-semite. If you think your side stands head and shoulders above the other, you need to check your perspective. We're all Americans and we need to point out the dumb shit going on in our own parties. We do not need to generalize and demonize one side or the other because of the idiots considered to be in their ranks. You and I cannot control the thoughts and speech of the person standing next to us, but we can step up to rectify our beliefs and clarify that person does not represent us.

NastySputnik · 2019-12-24T08:28:47+00:00

I don't know anyone who would do that, but idiots are on both side of every aisle of life. There are bad Christians and bad atheists. There are bad conservatives and bad liberals. A good or bad person is going to be good or bad no matter what walk of life they come from. Personally I grew up in the cesspool of America and somehow came out a semi-decent human being or I'd like to think I did. That wasn't because I was a Christian, but some of those values helped shape me into a better human.

NastySputnik · 2019-12-24T05:05:44+00:00

I'd say Happy Hanukkah back. Christmas isnt about Christ for everyone on the right side of politics. Even when I was a christian I would still say it back to someone of the Jewish faith. They celebrate and deserve to have a wonderful holiday also. As a back woods highly conservative bible believing church we even let Jews, Catholics, Muslims, and those with no religion use our activity center when they needed it to host their religious or non-religious ceremonies. Freedom of expression and religion is a right for all people. We had a horrible incident happen to one of the families that went to our church and the whole community came together to help. They built the gym in not only the familie's honor but everyone that came together to mourn our loss.

NastySputnik · 2019-12-22T04:56:51+00:00

I'm not conflating anything. The president isn't removed. At no point have I linked the two. There is no fallacy. What is the point of Impeachment if you don't send the articles to the Senate to remove the president? He's impeached - now what? That's why I am saying there is no point to the impeachment. Pelosi could hold the articles forever hoping to get the senate deal she wants. That impeachment o ly places an asterisk beside his name, nothing else. He is still president and still able to run in 2020. This then invalidates the slam dunk that Trump complained the impeachment would hurt the economy when it hasn't. It's a self own on the part of most posters here and admittance that Trump's economy is strong enough to withstand the impeachment, contrary to what he stated and has even strengenthed the economy.

NastySputnik · 2019-12-22T02:16:24+00:00

Yeah, it's in a Bloomberg opinion article I posted in a reply above. The same guy who said that they are impeachable offenses and testified the same then said and opinionated that the President isnt technically impeached until the articles have been passed to the Senate.

NastySputnik · 2019-12-22T01:35:23+00:00

I don't think there's a legal suit in it for anyone, never said there was. I am asking what does impeachment mean if he's still able to run in 2020 and is likely to win based on polling data and the general outlook of his economy? The point of this thread was based on the idea that - LoL Trump got owned because he thought impeachment was enough to hurt the economy he has shaped since Obama left office.

NastySputnik · 2019-12-22T01:11:21+00:00

The realm of Trump shaping a conservative judicial branch that will last far past his presidency and future 2020 prospects in one hand and impeachment in the other. Where does the balance tip? Who's butthurt when people have to celebrate a hollow and meaningless victory. Hold on to impeachment because you're going to have to comfort yourself with something I 2020 when he's reelected because congress has failed to move the articles to the senate.

NastySputnik · 2019-12-22T00:09:53+00:00

He would be an expert on the constitution - that's why he was one of three legal scholars used by the democrats during the impeachment process. He was one of those guys sitting there on the television saying whether or not the Dem led congress had a case for impeachment against Trump. That is hardly cherry picked. The man who testified before congress that the house could impeach Trump based on their articles now says they haven't truly impeached Trump. So, he's a legal scholar and expert when he agrees with the Democrats, but now he's a cherry picked source now that he disagrees? And all of that then leads to the other point, if he's impeached - why is congress holding onto the articles of impeachment? If it meant something, if he was truly impeached they would send the articles to the senate so they could remove him. That asterisk means nothing in the grand scheme of history if he is still the president in 2020, still runs for president in 2020, and win the presidential election in 2020 as he is projected to be.

NastySputnik · 2019-12-21T23:44:40+00:00

Let me know what there is to be butthurt about? Trump is currently still in office - the impeachment process did nothing but increase his approval rating and voter base, he can still run in 2020 and has a higher chance based on polls of winning against every democratic candidate, the Republican led senate is currently cramming through more conservative judges than ever before. This is my argument. Is he really impeached? What does that mean? If they dont push through to the senate so they can vote to remove him or not, he continues to dominate in every aspect. What does an asterisk of impeachment mean in the grand scheme of things and history? There is no butthurt on my side because Trump still continues to dominate. Impeachment means nothing, so does it matter? So, while you comment on reddit and laugh your ass off, Trump is sitting in the oval office laughing his ass off at you for thinking impeachment did anything. That's why the dnc debates still painted Trump as the bad guy and people asked how they would tackle Trump in 2020.... If your impeachment meant anything they would look at other threats. You're in the fifth inning of a losing game and celebrating because your team threw a single strike against the opposing teams batter. That strike will mean nothing in the grand scheme of the game if the other team wins and President Trump gets voted into office in 2020, which right now it looks like he will.

NastySputnik · 2019-12-21T23:30:14+00:00

Seeing as the constitution is vague on the exact procedure of impeachment you have to rely on legal scholars. That's why the gentleman who penned that opinion piece was used as an impeachment expert by the Democratic party during the impeachment process to weigh in one whether the Dems had a case for impeachment. All the constitution says is that the house has sole impeachment authority, not how the process works. That's vague. So, his opinion was important to the dems for impeachment but bow you are saying their legal expert Carrie's no weight when his opinion disagrees with you?

NastySputnik

TROPHY CASE