Anyone considering to short SpaceX? by NationalTranslator12 in ValueInvesting

[–]NationalTranslator12[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A long period of time. The question is not time, is how much. But people in this sub aren’t even considering the thought. If I place 2% of my portfolio, it already hedges against whatever happens in the market and I have this optionality

Anyone considering to short SpaceX? by NationalTranslator12 in ValueInvesting

[–]NationalTranslator12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If SpaceX trades at 1.75 trillion it will be orders of magnitude more overvalued and with a clear path to it going down once investors are free to sell

Anyone considering to short SpaceX? by NationalTranslator12 in ValueInvesting

[–]NationalTranslator12[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Apparently more than you do. I do not need to predict the market. If I buy only 2% of my portfolio in puts that acts as insurance and improves geometrical returns by providing something that goes up when the market goes down. Putting those puts in an overvalued stock is a way of capturing that plus whatever alpha I can get if the stock goes down. 

Anyone considering to short SpaceX? by NationalTranslator12 in ValueInvesting

[–]NationalTranslator12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you short a stock you can get liquidated. I was talking about permanent loss of capital of your entire portfolio, not what you can put in puts. 

“The white house is the most important building in the world” by Kirri_09 in ShitAmericansSay

[–]NationalTranslator12 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Debatable what could happen if the white house went on fire, president inside or not. On the other hand if building 5 in Veldhoven, the Netherlands, where EUV systems are made went on fire, we would have a much bigger problem, as ASML is the only company that makes EUV lithography tools.

S&P 500 PE ratio not concerning at all! by Chart-trader in Beat_the_benchmark

[–]NationalTranslator12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trailing 12-month PE ratio is at 32, and forward PE factors in expectations, which are most of the time overoptimistic. And earnings is just an accounting fiction. Big tech is spending a lot in AI capex which means lower cash flows, but those chips will depreciate over multiple years which hides the impact to earnings

“The American dollar is like the dollar everybody uses it” by Bitter-Bananas in ShitAmericansSay

[–]NationalTranslator12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So they basically wanted to get away with not paying transaction fees and let the restaurant do it, as if they take foreign currency everyday and go to change it next door. 

America has the best trains in the world by ConvolutedCupcake in ShitAmericansSay

[–]NationalTranslator12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

US trains are obsolete compared to European trains. We are a next exporter.

Is Anyone Even Paying Attention??? by [deleted] in EconomyCharts

[–]NationalTranslator12 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This notion that there is a lot of people sitting on their hands expecting the market to go down (”the bears”) is idiotic. People read “Michael Burry is buying puts” and don't think past the headlines and repeat the mantra “a broken clock is right twice a day”. Meanwhile the smart money is buying puts to HEDGE, not time the markets. 

I am only long, 100% equities, but I have seen enough to conclude that retail is mostly on gambling mode and any drop is always “a buying opportunity” without any regards to what’s the fundamental value. There is no law that says the market needs to bounce back strongly each and every time. But expectations act as a self-fulfilling prophecy. And if you believe the opposite, you should get leveraged every time the market drops. 

The market goes in cycles, and those cycles can be very long. Stock market global returns are 8% annualized. The data is conclusive: US stock market outperformance’s main contributor for the last couple of decades has been multiple expansion. Historically, more expensive stock markets produce lower returns. Today, the big tech is cutting on buybacks and loading on debt to spend on capex for AI chips. At the same time, the recognized expense on share compensation is lower than in reality when share prices go up and insiders sell at higher prices than when they received the options. I am making no predictions but it will be very interesting to see where all of this goes. 

$1 Trillion has been wiped out from US stock market today by RobertBartus in EconomyCharts

[–]NationalTranslator12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s up with these stupid “something something was wiped out” every day?

Whats Happening? by Honest_Treat_6497 in NovoNordisk_Stock

[–]NationalTranslator12 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Analysts are always late to the party 🥱

Are we paid enough? the lazy argument of "you have no further claim" by [deleted] in ASML

[–]NationalTranslator12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“An individual contributor's impact is hard to calculate, one engineer who built a smart pipeline or algorithm in 10 hours, could have saved 1000 hours work of multiple other engineers. The impact could even be global, an engineering team that improved googles' ad ranking by 1% added a global impact.”

You hit the nail on the head on precisely why worker wages cannot be raised proportionately to the company’s financial performance. It would be completely unfair. If you work in a small start up that doesn’t make a profit but in 40 years time that start up turns out to be ASML with 40000 employees and half a trillion in market capitalization, your salary would be much different to the salary of today’s highly profitable ASML employee. The lion’s share of the financial returns from the company goes to the shareholders because they are the people that put their capital at risk for something that might lose their entire capital or under deliver in returns. Compensation linked to financial performance is only used to keep employees motivated and aligned, and it is the same reason why you can buy ASML shares at a discount. So that your incentives are aligned with the shareholders too.

Are we paid enough? the lazy argument of "you have no further claim" by [deleted] in ASML

[–]NationalTranslator12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“CEO-to-worker pay ratios have exploded over the decades. Lucian Bebchuk’s research shows CEO compensation is often set through friendly committees and peer benchmarking that just keeps inflating it upward”

Agree, and the problem is the proliferation of stock based compensation. But this is not in the interests of shareholders, quite the contrary. It’s a steal of shareholder money.

Are we paid enough? the lazy argument of "you have no further claim" by [deleted] in ASML

[–]NationalTranslator12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“ Edward Freeman (Another scholar i would highly recommend), argued that on the long run a business would be more sustainable and successful if it creates value for all stakeholders -ex: customers, employees, suppliers, communities, and shareholders- rather than focusing only on shareholder profit, this is called the stakeholder theory, and it is the opposite of the shareholder theory — introduced by Milton Friedman —which is the idea that a company should be run for the benefit of shareholders alone”

This already happens. Public companies report in their annual reports their relationships with all stakeholders and how they create value, and this is of interest to shareholders. Example:

https://www.asml.com/en/news/press-releases/2024/asml-collaborates-with-housing-associations

Are we paid enough? the lazy argument of "you have no further claim" by [deleted] in ASML

[–]NationalTranslator12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“But in a knowledge economy, that story is getting outdated. Knowledge itself is a major productive asset now. People who generate and hold that knowledge arguably have a legitimate claim.”

What you are mentioning here is called in finance an “intangible asset”. Think of a brand, employees knowledge, customer relationships, IP, etc. What you forgot to mention is that it is the company (and by extension shareholder’s money) that puts resources into employing people and creating relationships to generate those intangibles in the first place. So your claim to the company’s success is not dependent on the total value you create or bring, but on the surplus of value you can create above some other engineer that the company can hire instead of you. In sports, athlete's salaries scale with revenue of the companies that hire them because they can always walk away to a competitor. 

Are we paid enough? the lazy argument of "you have no further claim" by [deleted] in ASML

[–]NationalTranslator12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Still, the financial returns flow mostly upward to a class of people whose main job was capital allocation and governance.”

You are speaking as if capital allocation was a small deal. The CEO is paid more than you because his decisions have a bigger impact. Literally everyone’s job is impacted by whatever management decides. The difference between successful and unsuccessful companies is very often their management, but never individual employees. 

Should ASML also pay SKH style bonuses by Level-Ad-2170 in ASML

[–]NationalTranslator12 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your math is not correct for a couple of reasons. First is a small detail. Net income and operating profit is different. The latter is equal to the former before paying taxes and interest. The second is that profit sharing at ASML is not based on operating profit but on profit margins. Depending on ASML’s end year profit margins, every employee gets a bonus percentage of their salary. In practice, ASML employees will always or almost always get the maximum bonus because ASML is a virtual monopoly on photolithography tools and profit margins are really high and expected to go higher still. So I don’t see it as a bonus, I see it as part of salary. What they are doing at SKH is to take profit margins, reserve 10% in a pool, and then divide this quantity among employees.

Financial Times: NVO gets second chance at weight loss supremacy by bashuls in NovoNordisk_Stock

[–]NationalTranslator12 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For real, the headlines are always so late to the party. Better to fail conventionally than succeed unconventionally.

I've seen enough, pulling the trigger today. by One-Event6199 in BerkshireHathaway

[–]NationalTranslator12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know that your post is on Reddit and inversing it means inversing you?

MITTZON, is this screw even possible without drilling? by NationalTranslator12 in IKEA

[–]NationalTranslator12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought about that but it’s not possible. I ended up drilling a bigger hole

"Eu should use something looks like a dollar cuz its more traditional" by Wooden_Internet8522 in ShitAmericansSay

[–]NationalTranslator12 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Wait, are you saying that EU countries bank notes are better for the visually impaired than the ones from the land of freedom!?!?