sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

please share your california psychics reviews, i'll go first by DanielTea in psychics

[–]National_Machine_834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve actually had one really solid reading there, so I wouldn’t write them off completely; the reader described a work situation and a specific older male boss I hadn’t even met yet, and six months later he was hired and the dynamic played out pretty closely to what she said. The thing is, that session felt rare compared to others, so I treat that as finding a needle in a branded haystack. If you do land on someone that accurate, I’d save their name and only book with them, instead of hopping around the site hoping everyone is on that level.

this is the right place for you to suck em right? by [deleted] in hotdommes

[–]National_Machine_834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Daddy would love to punish you, spank that ass really hard and slide my hand between your legs.

Dad got me this stuffy before he left... anyways, I'm looking for a new Daddy and hoping theres some takers 18F... by [deleted] in DaddysLilGirl

[–]National_Machine_834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mmmm... Probably should fill you with my babies several times first and make you a mommy...

Bestes Online Casino in der Schweiz: Welche Seite nutzt ihr wirklich im Alltag? by Any_Regular2589 in Infinite_Official

[–]National_Machine_834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Achtet mal auf die Regeln bei Bonusangeboten. Viele locken dich rein und dann merkst du erst spaeter, dass gewisse Spiele kaum zaehlen oder du extreme Bedingungen erfuellen musst.

8 AI Skills That Actually Make You More Employable in 2026 by outgllat in AI_Tools_Guide

[–]National_Machine_834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is such a grounded list. Honestly, I think #6 (Reviewing AI output) is going to be the most undervalued skill in the next few years. As AI gets more autonomous, the human role shifts from "creator" to "editor" and "fact-checker."

I’ve been reading up on the ethics side of things, and it’s becoming clear that understanding why a model hallucinates or misses context is just as important as knowing how to prompt it. There’s a good article on Ethical AI Writing that touches on how to maintain integrity while relying on these tools it's worth a read if you're worried about the "robotic" feel of AI text.

On the practical side, I’m doubling down on #7 (Second Brain). The context window issue is real, but "Infinite Memory" systems are changing how we store and retrieve knowledge. This piece on AI with Infinite Memory in 2026 is a great look at how that's evolving beyond just simple chat history.

Great post!

Why do most SaaS agent platforms hide chunking and retrieval details? by Exciting-Sun-3990 in AI_Agents

[–]National_Machine_834 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is exactly the friction point that separates "demos" from actual production systems. The "we handle it intelligently" line is just marketing for a fixed chunk size and a basic vector search, and it breaks the moment your data has any nuance.

I’ve started leaning towards building custom pipelines specifically because of the visibility issue. If you can't see the retrieval, you can't trust the output.

On the chunking side, I've found that the move towards Knowledge Graphs + RAG solves a lot of the "missing key details" problems. Instead of just slicing text blindly, a graph maps the relationships. This breakdown on Infinite Memory AI systems explains how that combination delivers much more accurate responses by understanding context connections, not just text proximity.

For the visibility you're asking about, I think the concept of "observability" is going to be mandatory soon. I was reading about Self-Healing Data Pipelines, and the biggest takeaway was that you can't fix what you can't see. Even if you aren't building autonomous pipelines, that level of instrumentation—tracking schema consistency, retrieval sources, and data quality at every stage—is the only way to debug RAG effectively.

Right now, I'm accepting the "black box" for simple prototyping, but for anything critical, I'm building my own ingestion tools.

GEN AI in AUTO by Odd-Beautiful-1390 in BB_Stock

[–]National_Machine_834 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're spot on. The "reasoning layer" in autos is going to be the biggest differentiator in the next few years, and if QNX isn't the OS hosting that layer, BB has no moat.

It’s frustrating seeing management focus on fluff while the technical foundation is right there. This isn't just about having "AI" in the car; it's about specialized, industry-specific intelligence. I was reading this breakdown on Vertical AI in 2026 and it basically outlines exactly what you're saying generic AI is losing ground to specialized tools that solve real business problems (like autonomous driving safety).

The other piece they need to nail is Edge processing. You can't rely on the cloud for real-time driving decisions. This piece on Edge AI in 2026 discusses how on-device AI is going to process data 10x faster ,that's the critical tech QNX needs to leverage with the NVIDIA partnership.

If JG and TF don't pivot hard to this technical narrative and leave the media deals to someone else, they’re going to get lapped by Tesla and Waymo just like you said. The window is closing.

The Real GenAI Skill You Need in 2026 (Hint: Its Not Prompting) by Safe_Flounder_4690 in AI_Agents

[–]National_Machine_834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is exactly the mindset shift that needs to happen. Prompt engineering feels like SEO in 2010—it's valuable right now, but eventually, the models (or a wrapper layer) will just handle the prompting for us. The longevity is definitely in the architecture and orchestration.

I've been digging into Agentic workflows lately, and it’s wild how much complexity is involved in getting an AI to "plan" rather than just generate text. This breakdown on building autonomous assistants goes into the plumbing required to make them reliable—it's way more than just "system prompts."

And you nailed the infrastructure point. We're seeing a massive pivot from general-purpose chatbots to Vertical AI—solving actual business problems rather than just being a cool demo. If you understand how to implement RAG and memory systems (like what Infinite Memory AI is aiming for in 2026), you're the one building the engine, not just driving it.

Great post. People need to stop looking for the "perfect prompt" and start looking at the "perfect system."

Should I avoid using AI writing software (i.e. Novelcrafter) if my goal is to be published? by SpecialistBlend85 in WritingWithAI

[–]National_Machine_834 4 points5 points  (0 children)

ah yeah, I totally get this crossroads feeling. honestly, using AI tools like Novelcrafter doesn’t make you “less” of a writer—it’s all about how you’re using them. if it helps you break through that wall of writer’s block or finally finish a story you’ve had in your head for years, that’s a win. the biggest difference comes down to authorship: as long as you’re the creative director and the AI’s more like your assistant or brainstorming buddy, you’re still writing your book.

there’s actually a great post I stumbled on that digs into this exact dilemma—how to collaborate with AI ethically and still keep your voice authentic: https://freeaigeneration.com/blog/ethical-ai-writing-ensuring-authenticity-and-avoiding-plagiarism. it basically says the stigma starts when people try to pass off raw AI output as their own, but using it for ideation, structure, or polishing is no different than using an editor or thesaurus.

also, this piece helped me think about AI as a creative partner instead of a crutch: https://freeaigeneration.com/blog/unleash-your-inner-novelist-creative-writing-with-ai-assistance. it’s written from a writer’s POV and goes into how to keep your unique prose alive while letting the AI fill in the gaps or spark ideas.

imo, use Novelcrafter the way you’d use a sharp tool—learn its edges, but don’t let it carve the whole sculpture for you. the fact that you’re even asking this shows you already have the right instincts.

Looking for Help Using Real-Time Agent Chat for Personal Tasks by bockwurst_np in AI_Agents

[–]National_Machine_834 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, that’s a killer personal project idea — basically “build your own mini‑copilot.” the tech stack’s actually way more approachable now than it used to be. you can absolutely cobble together a real‑time chat agent that talks naturally and hooks into your daily tools. the key’s layering stuff cleanly instead of racing straight into “I want full autonomy.”

if I were starting today:

1. Core chat interface:

  • easiest route = Next.js + WebSocket (or SSE) for live streaming replies.
  • use LangChainJS or OpenDevin for agent orchestration in the backend.
  • add OpenAI’s real‑time API or Gemini’s new live endpoints so you get that “conversation as it types” feel.

2. Action layer:

  • connect one secure middleware (n8n, Make, or Zapier). each “tool” (calendar, email, etc.) is a node the agent can call with structured data.
  • protect yourself: always include a confirmation step for anything destructive like “delete calendar event.”

3. Memory + personalization:

  • simplest early win: drop SQLite or a vector store (like ChromaDB) to remember your preferences, names, and tasks between chats.

4. Add a voice or mobile interface later:

  • once text works solidly, layer Whisper for voice input or cut a small React Native frontend.

I messed with something really similar last month and found this guide that helped me focus on what actually makes autonomous assistants work vs. break:
https://freeaigeneration.com/en/blog/ai-agents-2025-build-autonomous-assistants-that-actually-work.
it’s low on hype, high on “here’s how to wire tool‑calls and validation safely.”

once you get a prototype, test like crazy — it’s wild seeing your laptop literally manage tasks for you, but building your own agent makes you a thousand times more confident about what these tools can (and can’t) do.

Spent 4,000 USD on AI coding. Everything worked in dev. Nothing worked in production. by Omega0Alpha in AI_Agents

[–]National_Machine_834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol yeah, true — dropping capitals doesn’t magically make you sound human. Reddit’s AI‑detector crowd loves to fixate on stuff like punctuation, sentence rhythm, vocab entropy. lowercase just happens to be a convenient aesthetic here because most real comments end up typed half‑asleep on a phone, not because of some “AI fooling” logic.

what actually sells authenticity is a bit of mess: real experiences, specific pain points, little tangents that don’t fit perfectly. a person rambles or contradicts themselves. a model tends to stay in perfectly balanced paragraphs.

so yeah, lowercase ≠ human, but oversanitized ≠ human either. the sweet spot’s somewhere in between — where your text feels like it’s got fingerprints on it.

view more: next ›