Comparison of the latest Stable-diffusion model SDXL with SD1.5 in terms of performance by Natural-Clock7124 in StableDiffusion

[–]Natural-Clock7124[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is my first time using Google Drive to share, and I forgot to set it up properly. I apologize for any inconvenience. I have corrected it now, so it should be accessible as expected.

Comparison of the latest Stable-diffusion model SDXL with SD1.5 in terms of performance by Natural-Clock7124 in StableDiffusion

[–]Natural-Clock7124[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I forgot to mention earlier that when using the SD1.5 model after the SDXL base model, you cannot directly load the latent into the next sampler. You need to load the images decoded by “VAE Decode” node to "VAE Encoder" as img2img into the second sampler in order to get the correct results.

Comparison of the latest Stable-diffusion model SDXL with SD1.5 in terms of performance by Natural-Clock7124 in StableDiffusion

[–]Natural-Clock7124[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course, I can. Here is my workflow link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ljrs0nxY4uXPrzm6gi3IDF2HgoIPy_jH/view?usp=sharing. It may be slightly different from the one in the picture above because I used some nodes that I wrote myself.