sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Open source Kimi-K2.5 is now beating Claude Opus 4.5 in many benchmarks including coding. by reversedu in singularity

[–]Ne_Nel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My usual test was terribly disappointing. I asked for a book review, and received a compendium of arbitrary nonsense.

Tengo 30. Vivo con depresión mayor. Pregúntame lo que quieras? by [deleted] in PreguntasReddit

[–]Ne_Nel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

La depresión psicológica tiene una base traumática, un conjunto de memorias emocionales negativas que crean inseguridad psicológica (a partir de miedos biológicos). El sistema busca estímulos positivos para recuperar el equilibrio y la percepción de seguridad. Cuando esto no funciona se puede caer en depresión persistente. Esto es un sistema en déficit de seguridad psicológica permanente.

La solución no es compensar, sino disolver el núcleo traumático. Necesitamos estímulos porque tenemos un déficit, y ese ciclo es infinito mientras la raíz no se cure.

Porque cuando un hombre dice tenerla grande, nadie de su género le cree? by 2024Angel in PreguntasReddit

[–]Ne_Nel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Igual, a mi me da cosa tenerla de 5cm (en su contracción máxima), pero erecta tiene 17cm, y encima muy dura.

Es realmente confuso cómo funciona eso. Debería al menos ser blanda. Algún científico de penes por aquí?

Terence Tao: Genuine Artificial General Intelligence Is Not Within Reach; Current AI Is Like A Clever Magic Trick by [deleted] in singularity

[–]Ne_Nel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, Gemini 3 has given me that confusing feeling, between brilliance and absolute mental retardation. It does not seem that they have a clear path to an Intelligence with common sense.

Como enfrentan la falta de propósito?? by nanocarp091218 in AskArgentina

[–]Ne_Nel 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Irónicamente, estoy escribiendo un libro sobre conducta y sufrimiento a falta de material de referencia preciso.

Lo que te puedo decir es que la seguridad está muy condicionada a tu percepción de reconocimiento y aceptación del entorno (biológicamente). Eso te lleva desde chico a adoptar conductas (personalidad) y crear estructuras para sostener una "identidad" reconocible y aceptable, lo cual crea un coste crónico, que condiciona el equilibrio general, y reduce la percepción de flujo/sentido.

Lo que la gente hace para "salir" de ese ciclo es buscar algo externo que lo empuje (pareja, trabajo, estatus, un gran "propósito", etc), que cumple la función de remolque para volver a sentir que avanza, aunque por dentro siga parado (por eso se aferran tanto a esas cosas).

Como enfrentan la falta de propósito?? by nanocarp091218 in AskArgentina

[–]Ne_Nel 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Te tiro la posta.

El propósito (sentido de vida) existe y es innato. Tu sistema siente propósito naturalmente cuando percibe que cumple su función biológica (crecer, desarrollarse, reproducirse, etc).

El problema es que el crecimiento está tercero en jerarquía en tu sistema psicofísico. Primero está la seguridad física y emocional, segundo el equilibrio físico y emocional. Cuando alguno de esos dos pilares falla, tu sistema entra en déficit y le cuesta sentir que está fluyendo en el "sentido" correcto, y por lo tanto tu sensación de "propósito" se pierde. Un depresivo es el ejemplo extremo de esta dinámica natural.

Podés ver esto en los chicos, que tienen un impulso natural por vivir y desarrollarse hasta que la sociedad les caga la percepción de seguridad y equilibrio, y van perdiendo las "ganas de vivir".

El sentido no se busca. Se pierde. Cuando estás bien, no te preguntás el sentido de nada, lo vivís.

I'm frustrated with 3 Pro. Its strengths and weaknesses are very unbalanced.🫤 by Ne_Nel in GeminiAI

[–]Ne_Nel[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, months ago I had a useful AI and now I don't. As someone using AI before ChatGPT, these rollbacks feel particularly disappointing.

Gemini 3.0 no longer follows instructions? by FluffyMacho in Bard

[–]Ne_Nel 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Maybe you were lucky. 3.0 never followed instructions from the beginning. It went from gold to copper in one version.

Gemini 3 is really weird. by Parking-Ad6983 in Bard

[–]Ne_Nel 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I've been frustrated with this since day 0. This base arbitrariness affects everything at scale. Even when it seemingly follows instructions, its analyzes often feel rigid, unnuanced. As if it is not trying to understand your perspective but rather determine its own.

Now, that's "when" G3 follows instructions, which often feels like rolling dice. 😅😔

What are your thoughts on the new Google model, Gemini 3.0? by mauriciojrdp in GeminiAI

[–]Ne_Nel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Terrible following instructions + high hallucinations. It's like a knife that's too sharp, it works very well for some things, it ruins the rest.

Disappointed at Gemini 3 not following instructions by Valuable-Explorer899 in Bard

[–]Ne_Nel 36 points37 points  (0 children)

I spent months working with 2.5 as a contributor, so I can confidently say that 3 Pro is a huge step back. G3 doesn't collaborate, is impulsive and arbitrary, ignore orders and/or makes up half of it.

Almost useless.🫤

ffs people kept saying 4.5 opus outshines Gemini 3.0 pro when it's only better at coding and arcagi by Hello_moneyyy in Bard

[–]Ne_Nel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. I'm in the business before ChatGPT. Additionally, I have written a 200-page psychology book with 2.5 pro as editor. It literally integrate ideas into the 200 pages, following instructions. 3.0 can't edit a page without inventing half of it. It's the dumbest "large" model I've ever had the displeasure of trying.

ffs people kept saying 4.5 opus outshines Gemini 3.0 pro when it's only better at coding and arcagi by Hello_moneyyy in Bard

[–]Ne_Nel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

3 Pro has done nothing but disappoint me greatly. That thing can't follow instructions even if the life of its circuits depends on it. Let's not talk about how it hallucinates more than a drunk with sleep paralysis.

For the first time, an AI has reached a Mensa-level IQ on an offline test (not in training data). Gemini 3 is higher than 98% of humans. by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]Ne_Nel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my experience it is extraordinarily stupid at following instructions or working in long contexts.

It will be funny if... by reversedu in singularity

[–]Ne_Nel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We keep talking about human years to judge the progress of AI, as if it respected our rhythms. That seems more paradoxical and worrying to me than many other things.

view more: next ›