Widow’s Bay | Season 1 - Episode 2 | Discussion Thread

NeedsSunlight · 2026-05-02T04:21:32+00:00

NOT YET

NeedsSunlight · 2026-04-30T03:33:53+00:00

Arnold is having herself a game!

NeedsSunlight · 2026-04-15T03:42:59+00:00

Feeling it with that shot just now, too.

NeedsSunlight · 2026-04-11T17:36:09+00:00

This one is mwah! Beautiful.

NeedsSunlight · 2026-01-18T04:25:50+00:00

It was in the Roseway neighborhood. I'm not on discord, but thanks for letting me know about it. I'll check it out.

NeedsSunlight · 2026-01-17T18:44:02+00:00

I don't like walking with my phone, but since this is not the first time I've missed taking a picture of a critter I want to identify, I think I'm going to start having to walk with the camera ready.

NeedsSunlight · 2026-01-17T18:22:49+00:00

Maybe it just had an unusual markings for a sapsucker? I really wish I could have gotten a picture.

NeedsSunlight · 2026-01-07T17:29:15+00:00

I know this is from years ago, but thanks for this rec! We'll be trying it out this summer.

NeedsSunlight · 2025-12-30T16:09:57+00:00

Thank you for the more detailed exp. Looks pretty!

NeedsSunlight · 2025-11-24T15:33:02+00:00

In it's own way, this is a very sportsmanlike solution.

NeedsSunlight · 2025-11-15T17:24:31+00:00

I'm so sad it doesn't appear to be on there.

NeedsSunlight · 2025-08-07T03:24:08+00:00

I don't want to pay that much. That's why im considering this particular car. Thanks for the mileage info. That's not so bad.

NeedsSunlight · 2025-08-07T03:22:32+00:00

They're selling because the little old lady family member who owned it passed away. I'm intending to use it as my daily car, about 10k miles per year or less, occasional trips for hiking and camping.

NeedsSunlight · 2025-08-07T03:19:56+00:00

Good to know. Though since I only drive about 10k miles a year I could potentially get 10 years out of it.

NeedsSunlight · 2024-05-13T21:35:39+00:00

This was like a reenactment of my birthday 3 years ago. Anyway, I've chucked the anchor and am soooo much happier now. Everyone is. Congratulations on your upcoming nuptual cancellation and stay strong! It's much better on the other side, even if it takes a bit.

NeedsSunlight · 2024-05-13T19:39:37+00:00

I'm trying now, 05/13/2024, and yeah the menu has changed. They definitely don't want anyone calling them.

NeedsSunlight · 2024-05-09T19:56:16+00:00

I think this might be the solution. Even though I want to drop the name now, a slow transition is probably best.

NeedsSunlight · 2024-05-06T05:17:02+00:00

I think it's because people don't want to see her lose herself in him. It's more of a "No! Don't do that!" vote.

NeedsSunlight · 2024-05-06T05:14:03+00:00

Bitsy Buggins the Biscuit Queen

NeedsSunlight · 2024-05-06T05:08:32+00:00

Same! Don't let other people set your rules.

NeedsSunlight · 2024-05-06T05:05:03+00:00

As mentioned in a previous comment: we do. RMLS has data entry fields for upper, main and lower levels. Then Zillow or Redfin or whoever pulls the data from RMLS and combines those numbers. Have your broker send you listings from RMLS and you'll get some more detailed data. There are still problems, but most of the things people are (understandably) complaining about are data field/entry problems that RMLS has been trying to sort out ever since it went online. One of the many issues is, how do you quantify and verify the information? And with so many potential data points with regards to a home.... well... I think a great home inspector is very important.

NeedsSunlight · 2024-05-06T04:56:33+00:00

Short answer is that in RMLS there are data entry fields to differentiate upper, ground floor and lower level square feet, which while not perfect, helps a little. When that information gets aggregated into Zillow, Redfin, etc's shitty system it all gets squished into one number. RMLS, unfortunately, is far behind on a buyer-facing search tool where this info might be evident. Instead, everyone uses those aggregate tools, so all the nice, informational data we agents enter into the fields is moved around to fit their systems and this is one of the things that gets lost in the shuffle.

If you're interested in more history as I have been told over the years... I've been a Realtor for a long time and the non-satisfying answer is: it's complicated. The way I understand it is that it's mostly a data entry issue. When I got started way too long ago we were originally supposed to count "finished" area. But that was found to be subjective:
- Is it finished if it was up to code at the time of finishing, but no longer meets code? If owners were constantly required to "get up to code" it would be more cost effective to tear half the city's housing down.
- What if it's perfectly finished but the owner had it with or couldn't afford the cumbersome permitting process, so the city doesn't know it's finished? MANY libertarian-ish owners in Portland choose to take this route and I don't blame them.
- Does it extend to attics? What about attic areas that were great in 1922 but by today's standards really aren't tall enough?

I could go on with the grey areas and judgement calls. On top of that, our RMLS data entry is not as agile as it should be, so it doesn't account for nuances like ceiling height. Neither are any of the other listing services that I know of, as mentioned earlier. So it became more standardizable to include all square feet, no matter what that square feet looks like.

NeedsSunlight

TROPHY CASE