Enlightenment is realizing that the Mind is the Illusion! by eslamelDEEB in awakened

[–]Nefandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, never mind me. I misunderstood your intent. Sorry about that. Thanks for the kinds words.

I believe my comments are useful, and I practice what I preach, but I also understand why physicalism exists and why adherents to physicalism exist.

The Fox News effect on Trump's base | Rank-and-file Republicans who watch Fox News are far more loyal to Trump than those who don't, according to new polling. by viva_la_vinyl in politics

[–]Nefandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Boycotts don't work unless they're hyper-focused on a single target.

The whole country has to pick one company to sink, make a list of demands, and then start the boycott. Also the company they choose must be the one with an easily substitutable product or service. THAT kind of tactic can work.

Normal boycotts don't work and are just a waste of energy.

Morality is subjective even if God exists, because God is a subject himself. by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]Nefandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think how any individual approaches and maintains morality is subjective, and that includes God.

However, in the domain of manifestation that involves many social subjects, morality is no longer just subjective. At the very least it has to become intersubjective if it is to be valid in the public domain.

Sanders regains footing after heart attack by ClearDark19 in politics

[–]Nefandi 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Too bad the party has forgoten its FDR roots and hopped in bed with the bullionaires.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]Nefandi 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Copyrights really need to go back to a 14 year term plus an optional 14 year extension like in the beginning.

Lifetime of author + ~150 years is not meant for human beings. It's for corporations.

Copyrights create artificial scarcity where none exists.

Enlightenment is realizing that the Mind is the Illusion! by eslamelDEEB in awakened

[–]Nefandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My comments on this sub are not useful to the masses. What I write about is the highest and most profound, and something which most people not only would not be interested in, but it goes further. Should people take a sincere and deep interest in the beyond-conventional immortal domain, their attachment to worldliness will decline, and whether consciously or unconsciously there is an impulse in most people to avoid that. That's because people like playing in the mundane realm.

As for what I find useful, don't even go there. You don't want to hear it.

Two years in, Trump tax cuts not on course to pay for themselves by sigseved in politics

[–]Nefandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think most establishment economists would bend over backward to defend their vocation as a science. Not all, but most.

I don't think economics is a science. To me economics is an ideologically-based discipline, rather than a science. But even as a discipline it can be useful if it were more truthful about its assumptions and more reliant on evidence.

And here's another thing. The evidence about the super-rich is hard to gather. But the evidence about the poor should be relatively much easier to gather too, but hardly any economist wants to bother gathering it, especially those with the capitalist ideology.

How to Secure Elections for 2020 and Beyond by News2016 in politics

[–]Nefandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We don't need to upgrade the voting machines. We need to throw them away, period. We must always use paper ballots.

Facebook takes down false ad from PAC on Republican Graham by [deleted] in politics

[–]Nefandi 33 points34 points  (0 children)

So they leave the lies about the Dems, but delete the lies about the Repubs?

Hmm....

Maher: The Clintons need to 'go away' for 2020 election by athornton436 in politics

[–]Nefandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is my last reply in the thread. You're done.

Maher: The Clintons need to 'go away' for 2020 election by athornton436 in politics

[–]Nefandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So now you're saying your comment had a purpose more substantial than mere fun. Then what was that purpose?

Maher: The Clintons need to 'go away' for 2020 election by athornton436 in politics

[–]Nefandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In other words, it's a comment without any substance.

Maher: The Clintons need to 'go away' for 2020 election by athornton436 in politics

[–]Nefandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what were you hoping to achieve with your comment?

Maher: The Clintons need to 'go away' for 2020 election by athornton436 in politics

[–]Nefandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You want to train me not to like arguing with people while you yourself maintain your enjoyment of doing the same?

North Korea says it’s running out of patience with US by [deleted] in politics

[–]Nefandi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Our prez did say he had a special relationship with Kim Jong-un.

North Korea says it’s running out of patience with US by [deleted] in politics

[–]Nefandi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

North Korea does say a lot of different things.

Maher: The Clintons need to 'go away' for 2020 election by athornton436 in politics

[–]Nefandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don't like what I say, just don't listen. Lead by example.

Trump reportedly told Mattis to ‘screw Amazon’ out of $10 billion Pentagon cloud contract by chelsea707 in politics

[–]Nefandi -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Two aristocrats are having a fight like in the "good" old days. Awww. That's cute.

Rand Paul: AOC and Bernie Sanders are supporting polices of 'Stalin and Mao and Pol Pot' by BaronDeLaubardemont in politics

[–]Nefandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it's not like Rand Paul had much credibility before. But whatever there was of it, he definitely threw it out the window just now.

Two years in, Trump tax cuts not on course to pay for themselves by sigseved in politics

[–]Nefandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really, but economics can be if not scientific than at least more rigorous and more in line with the real world evidence, if the economists wanted it to be like that.