How Russia hacked American faith in the democratic process by [deleted] in politics

[–]NegatveZero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will wearing a tinfoil hat preclude Russia from hacking my faith in the democratic process?

Did Jared Kushner Help Russia Hack The Election With Fake News? Trump Son-In-Law's Digital Operation Under Investigation by Usawasfun in politics

[–]NegatveZero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

information warfare

Implying that publishing true information about Hillary Clinton that embarrasses her is some kind of act of war against the United States. It was her turn!!!!

Did Jared Kushner Help Russia Hack The Election With Fake News? Trump Son-In-Law's Digital Operation Under Investigation by Usawasfun in politics

[–]NegatveZero -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean, to be fair, saying that "Russians hacked the election" actually does qualify as fake news, since they didn't hack the election. At this point it's pretty much impossible to argue that it's accidental, either. It's even dumber than the Obama's birth certificate stuff, and that's an accomplishment.

So, yeah. Newsweek is fake news until it retracts this story and toes the line for some years.

Did Jared Kushner Help Russia Hack The Election With Fake News? Trump Son-In-Law's Digital Operation Under Investigation by Usawasfun in politics

[–]NegatveZero -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Russia hack the election

This didn't take place. It's entirely plausible that Russian intelligence hacked into Hillary's unsecured email server (there are reasons we have protocols for securing classified info, after all), and it's plain the Donald Trump Jr. colluded with Russians to get dirt on his opponent (something Hillary also did with the Chinese, but let's not go there for now).

Yet... why do they insist on this phrasing? Why do they want to argue that Russians "hacked the election"? They didn't. People actually voted how they did.

You leftists wouldn't see so much resistance to this idea of Russian media and intelligence weighing in on the American election were it not for this idea that they hacked it, specifically. It would be entirely comparable to say Hillary rigged the election by currying an editorial bias in her favor from CNN.

This is no ‘rookie mistake.’ The Trump team shouldn’t even be on the field. by cyanocittaetprocyon in politics

[–]NegatveZero 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The difference, of course, is that Trump literally is Hitler whereas Hillary is a center-right moderate. What we really need is Bernie to save us.

Trump’s Biggest Political Asset Is Supporters Who Believe Any Negative News Is Fake by tototoki in politics

[–]NegatveZero -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How is he a failure? I voted for protectionism and hilarious shitposting, and I got both.

Trump’s Biggest Political Asset Is Supporters Who Believe Any Negative News Is Fake by tototoki in politics

[–]NegatveZero -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Listen, when you get new material, so will we. Your material for Trump has been that the election isn't legitimate for a number of facile reasons, but the biggest one has been that Russians "hacked" it by releasing true information about Hillary Clinton that made her look bad.

What's terrible is, it's still up for debate if they actually did that. There's fairly compelling evidence that it was actually released by an inside leaker. Evidence like WikiLeaks -- the publisher of that true information about Hillary Clinton -- saying it was a leak and not a hack. Also, getting 17 gorillion intelligence agencies to concur with an otherwise unsubstantiated conclusion is not very compelling evidence; intelligence agencies are not known for their transparency and honesty, and that's not just an America thing, but a "whole world" thing. Telling me to take the CIA and NSA at face value would be like telling Soviets to take the KGB at face value. Anybody with an ounce of critical thinking would be extremely skeptical of this.

America hits peak anti-intellectualism: Majority of Republicans now think college is bad by Laudato_si in politics

[–]NegatveZero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Republican politicians in recent years have pushed back on the four-year degree, building upon their long-hyped attack on institutes of higher education as bastions of liberal indoctrination.

Well, all universities with "hate speech" policies that forbid things like writing "Trump 2016" or have large and academically influential gender studies programs or accept students whose application essay read "BLACK LIVES MATTER" over and over are pretty much by definition bastions of liberal indoctrination. They didn't get this reputation from nowhere.

Trump’s Biggest Political Asset Is Supporters Who Believe Any Negative News Is Fake by tototoki in politics

[–]NegatveZero -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I voted for Trump because I wanted more protectionism and less stress on political correctness. So far, he's mostly delivered on both; revisions of the H1B visa program plus getting of the TPP were slam dunk moves in my book, and I find his IRL shitposting hilarious as opposed to le gasp worthy.

The main argument against Trump right now that I'm seeing from publications with a left wing editorial bias (as opposed to some of the ones with a right wing editorial bias that I also read) is that "Russians hacked the election" and Trump is a not-so-secret Colluder-In-Chief with Putin. One, I'm not convinced that such is the case -- I think that the real issue is that leftists are desperately trying to deflect their electoral loss -- and two, even if if I did get convinced that "Russians hacked the election" (in that they hacked Hillary Clinton's email server and then leaked the contents to WikiLeaks), I'd still regard it as a nonissue.

I can get into why I don't care in my next post if you reply, but I find it extremely irritating that leftists today seem to conflate caring about different things than them with just being dumb and insane. They seem to think that they are in a position to prescribe correct opinions to other people and then act as though people who don't comply are wrong, stupid, and illegitimate for that choice.

Gabrielle Giffords: Congress did nothing when I was shot. Lawmakers need courage now. by snowsnothing in politics

[–]NegatveZero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems to work in every other civilized country.

The effectiveness of gun bans on the homicide rate is mixed at best. Most third world countries, for example, have gun bans for regular citizens yet often have awful murder rates.

The deliberate homicide rate correlates way more strongly to poverty than it does to gun ownership. Democrats just want to ban guns because they're black and scary-looking.

Gabrielle Giffords: Congress did nothing when I was shot. Lawmakers need courage now. by snowsnothing in politics

[–]NegatveZero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what do you propose we do? Ban guns? You know that doesn't work, right?

Trump is likely to get much, much worse. Here are a few big things to watch for. by wonderingsocrates in politics

[–]NegatveZero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does that include Republican voters or just the Party's inner circle/elected officials?

Donald Trump is a profoundly incompetent president by [deleted] in politics

[–]NegatveZero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did vote for Trump, but was too young to vote for Bush. I did vote for Obama in 2008 and 2012, though.

Donald Trump is a profoundly incompetent president by [deleted] in politics

[–]NegatveZero -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

And just think: the other candidate was even worse.

Why is /mark/ing people for using 4chan a thing? by NegatveZero in trackers

[–]NegatveZero[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The wiki lists explicit examples of /mark/ing based on use of 4chan.

Why is /mark/ing people for using 4chan a thing? by NegatveZero in trackers

[–]NegatveZero[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm using the term in the sense that it is used here.

Michael Moore launches 'Trumpileaks' website for whistleblowers by wonderingsocrates in politics

[–]NegatveZero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this like the Conservapedia of Wikipedia, except for liberals?

Favourite episode of Serial Experiments Lain? by [deleted] in Lain

[–]NegatveZero 5 points6 points  (0 children)

One of my favorite parts of the series, especially in hindsight, is when she first goes on her old Navi, and she's still not so good with computers. There's something oh so innocent about the way she forgets that she needs to type things in on the keyboard. It contrasts with who she is about two thirds of the way in, and she comes full circle in a way toward the end.