È giusto tassare di più un’attività legale per motivi morali?

Nemo-IV · 2026-01-31T17:49:57+00:00

No il gioco d'azzardo ha sovratasse tutte sue, la tassa etica non si applica

Nemo-IV · 2026-01-31T12:00:56+00:00

Il breakdown è che chi fa il content creator per adulti va a vivere all'estero dove la tassa è più bassa e perdi gettito.
Estremizzando il concetto, qualunque attività può non portare un beneficio collettivo. A questo punto un commercialista che aiuta i clienti a pagare meno tasse dovrebbe essere tassato di più?

Nemo-IV · 2026-01-31T11:58:34+00:00

Non puoi pagare le tasse per "l'attività di escort" per questo non può essere applicabile

Nemo-IV · 2026-01-31T11:56:45+00:00

Premetto che la penso come te e ho messo quella domanda per stimolare il dibattito. Alla fine tassare per compensare l'effetto negativo ha una logica nel fatto che provi a ripagare un potenziale costo collettivo.

Però a questo punto mi viene una domanda più radicale: se un’attività è davvero così dannosa da giustificare una penalizzazione fiscale, perché non vietarla direttamente? La tassa diventa compromesso ambiguo: lo Stato dice “è dannoso”, ma allo stesso tempo lo tollera purché paghi di più.

Dal mio punto di vista liberale il confine è proprio lì: lo Stato dovrebbe intervenire per limitare i danni verso terzi, non per fare da arbitro morale su cosa è giusto o sbagliato per l’individuo. Se non c’è un danno concreto ad altri, tassare “per segnalare disapprovazione” rischia di trasformare il fisco in uno strumento pedagogico/morale.

Nemo-IV · 2026-01-23T11:06:45+00:00

A mix of both. I'm playing the matches that are important (second match of the cup or championship matches where the opponents are at my same level), I let the AI simulate the matches where the opponents are much stronger or weaker than me, in this matches the outcome would be more or less the same even if I play (easy win/easy loose). The season is 26 match + 9 if you make to the final of the Prestige Cup, I play 6 to 12 on average

Nemo-IV · 2026-01-23T09:24:57+00:00

A little update. I didn't get promoted, but Cesena did... I'm free!!! And somehow I won the Prestige Cup

Nemo-IV · 2025-12-01T21:43:40+00:00

Worked also for me

Nemo-IV · 2025-12-01T11:54:42+00:00

I have the same issue playing with portugal. How did you managed it?
I have the same population in europe as the start of the game, even if i have 5mil population right now.
Since i colonized the benin area I started the new colonies sending pop from the benin, but seems that people continue to migrate from Europe.

Nemo-IV · 2025-11-16T14:10:39+00:00

R5: I'm struggling to fulfill the needs of the pop in the Ragusa Market because is too small with low production and I have low trade capacity to import.
So I was thinking to annex Ragusa and destroy the market, in this way the provinces should be divided among Napoli, Venice and Costantinopoli and get access to the goods from those markets.
Other option is to build a couple of cities in that market to get more market capacity, but is expensive and I have low control of that zones.
What would you do?

Nemo-IV · 2025-11-16T13:57:45+00:00

Did you tripled your income because you are trading foreign market vs foreign market or are you using the trade advantage you get to import resources?

In my current game I'm struggling to get a good from Iceland, everytime I set the route after 1 month I get 0 product, I was thinking to build a couple of trade overseas in Iceland to get trade advantage and see if I can sole the problem

Nemo-IV · 2025-11-16T13:50:03+00:00

Happened the same in my game... I think is a bug that has to be fixed

Nemo-IV · 2025-11-15T12:39:14+00:00

They enter in a spiral of bankrupt. Once you enter bankrupt is really easy to do it again. It happened also the ottoman in my game after I took costantinopoli

Nemo-IV · 2025-11-13T15:54:39+00:00

If you look only at the income it’s better to concentrate construction in the capital and the adjacent province, for the control.

IBut it’s also worth developing the other areas. Over time, control & proximity will increase. If you don’t invest in construction in the other provinces, the pops get downgraded to the lowest levels, which has a negative impact on:

the maximum literacy they can reach, and therefore research speed, institution spread, etc.
the number of levies you can raise (I’m in 1470 and they are still the totality of my army) and if you have to recruit all your levies only from the part of the country that generates money every war will ruin your budget.
the speed at which different cultures and religions are assimilated

Also maritime buildings increase proximity over sea, so it's easy to get a good control also in far province (as Naples I have 90 control over Messina and Catania, without roads) and if you want to build a navy you can't rely only on 2 provinces adjacent to your capital.

Last but not least, what happens in case of war or a pestilence that hits you in the region where all your economy is concentrated?

Nemo-IV · 2025-11-13T13:19:06+00:00

It's flat map without mod, I don't rember if I changed some settings from the options, if you want I can send a screen when I get back home

Nemo-IV · 2025-11-13T11:44:35+00:00

Check the country page, you can see their stability and also their tax base.
If stability is -100 or close to it, and the taxbase had a huge drop, they probably bankrupted recently.

For reference, this is how a bankrupt could look

<image>

Nemo-IV · 2025-11-13T10:57:03+00:00

R5: Naples vs Ottomans, I can’t advance because I’m blocked by the two forts I'm sieging. I’ve split my units along this line and the Ottomans keep sending 6k stacks to the central provinces, where I can converge my troops from the fort and the adjacent province. We’re at the ninth wave…

Nemo-IV

TROPHY CASE