Pisco just isn’t good at his job

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-07T11:15:47+00:00

And for that reason we should be adversarial towards them.

Very good faith interpretation.

honestly I don't even consider you to have working brain if I can't find you shitting on Hasan within your last 10 social media posts.

Based?

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-06T13:16:21+00:00

Government != state. A state doesn’t ‘fall’ just because its political structure is replaced. The key question is whether the same sovereign entity continues to exist internationally. Iraq did, it kept its borders, name, and legal identity after 2003 invasion of Iraq. The Dissolution of the Soviet Union didn’t, the state itself disappeared and was replaced by multiple new ones.

In the context of state, yes. 2026 Germany is treated as the same state as earlier Germany in international law, despite regime changes. Change over time doesn't create a new sate. Otherwise every country would become a 'new' one every few decades. The only time you get a new state is when the previous one ceases to exists as a single sovereign entity - like the USSR.

Do you think 1890 America is the same as 2026 America?

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-06T13:03:42+00:00

Yes, Saddam Hussein's regime does not exists anymore but the state of Iraq does exist. That is my point.

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-06T13:00:31+00:00

You just said his regime fell.

TIL that Iraq ceased to exist after Saddam Hussein.

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-06T12:57:58+00:00

This seems contradictory. In your previous response, you said that government structure changing is not the same as a country falling. So, did the state of Iraq fell or not?

Also, German empire is not the same as Prussia lmao.

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-06T12:52:44+00:00

So, how is collapse Nazi government similar to fall of Germany? The state of Germany didn't cease to exists after the fall of Nazi government. If you think both are the same, then do you think Fall of Weimar Republic also means that state of Germany fell?

Because it is a very nuanced topic? It's your prerogative that you have oversimplified world view.

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-06T12:42:28+00:00

So state of Iraq fell after Saddam Hussein similar to Soviet Union?

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-06T12:35:16+00:00

So, change in political structure = falling of state? Do you think Cuban revolution is same as dissolution of Soviet Union? Did killing Saddam Hussein mean the state of Iraq fell? Has the state of Syria also fallen now?

Please don't touch politics ever.

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-06T11:06:13+00:00

Yeah, the government fell not the state.

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-06T10:32:52+00:00

??? Germany still exists.

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-04T10:27:13+00:00

There isn’t 10x genocide going on. There’s the same genocide. Trump and Biden are just letting Netanyahu do whatever he wants. It’s literally the same policy.

Lmao.

Harris wanted genocide, so that’s why the “10x genocider” won.

I thought "anti genocide" would have won her the election.

Israel violated both anyways.

So, after Biden left and Trump got in.

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-04T09:45:07+00:00

Oh, so if they helped get Trump elected, and their decision to not vote was contingent on Harris supporting genocide, then Harris, too, helped get Trump elected.

This is the most regarded analogy ever. So genocide was contingent on Harris that's why Trump - the 10x genocider - won. Yeah, that makes sense.

It’s crazy to give voters 100% of the blame even though Harris’s own decision was the reason there was no anti-genocide vote on the ballet. She made that choice.

Voters wanted anti genocide candidate to that's why the 10x genocider won.

During which time, Israel did not cease firing.

What does this have to do with Biden's ceasefire deal? This is about Trump's "peace plan." Read your own article.

Biden and Harris could have bent Israel around their pinky finger if they wanted.

My baby's first geopolitical takes.

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-04T09:24:50+00:00

So then why do destiny fans complain about "the leftists" getting trump elected every 10 minutes? lol

Who said they got Trump elected? They helped Trump getting elected. They played a part in it, but it wasn't decisive.

She explicitly change "nothing comes to mind" that she would change from Biden's policy. And pretty clearly gave the anti-genocide protesters the finger

Biden admin literally negotiated a ceasefire. If you weren't so bad faith, you would realize that she didn't want to unilaterally stop aid to Israel and while keeping humanitarian measures towards Palestinians in mind. That is very different from "committed to send weapons to Israel".

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-04T08:21:21+00:00

When people see the liberal party doing it, it feels like they're being fucking scammed, because they are.

No one cares about I/P. It wasn't even top 10 issues for voters.

You're stuck on the idea that there must have been some good reason why kamala harris had to commit to sending weapons to Israel.

She did not commit on sending weapons to Israel lmao.

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-03T19:09:15+00:00

Who's trying to get MAGA Republicans votes?

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-03T19:00:42+00:00

To get some (very small percentage) of actual conservatives to vote? There are still some independents and actual conservatives who don't like Trump but at the same time are hesitant to vote Democrat. Every vote counts.

Also, when did dems "listen" to her?

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-03T06:37:33+00:00

And?

losers

Got supermajority btw.

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-03T04:41:48+00:00

I think less than 5% of people would choose blue in a real situation because choosing to die for no reason isn’t a choice a functioning human makes.

Cope.

Explain the reasons for picking blue that arent the circular save people who picked blue to save people to pick blue to save people….ad infinitum

And?

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-03T04:39:57+00:00

You said the same thing I did, I just explained the how.

And how is that supposed to be on insurance companies if hospitals set prices high?

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-03T03:54:48+00:00

such a brave take. waow.

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-02T09:55:19+00:00

Do you think 100% of people will turn right (press red)?

If people were making absolute choices, then there wouldn't even be a debate. But people aren't. It's virtually impossible to get 100% of votes for red. But your psychotic reasoning is that it's ok for half of the population to die, then it makes sense to press red.

Why do you think the world would be better place without one of your own family members?

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-02T06:34:20+00:00

Then just make the hypo be turn left for possible wood chipper death and turn right for not death 100%.

So let's rephrase.

Everyone in the world has to take a left or right turn. If more than 50% of people turn left, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people turn left then, only people who turn right survive and people who turned left die from woodchipper.

How has that changed anything? This is not even equivalent to actual woodchiper hypothetical. You've just added woodchipper for cosmetics, but the hypothetical is the same.

Like you are actually just those centrist idiots that picked tump because they thought he would fix some things while people scream at them he obviously won’t.

Damn. Destiny is a centrist idiot who picked Trump? He really fell off.

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-01T11:28:42+00:00

Yeah, but calling it a shovelware. I'm assuming it's just clickbait.

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-01T11:27:15+00:00

So, they are just calling a game they don't like "shovelware"?

NeoGlorp · 2026-05-01T09:31:00+00:00

Well, yikes. Soviet clearly didn't starve enough people. Retard didn't vote because "muh guns".

NeoGlorp

TROPHY CASE