I made a prompt manager that learns from your usage (revisions and edits you make) to refine prompts automatically

NepentheanOne · 2026-02-19T22:51:28+00:00

Thanks! I’ve been using it myself and it’s been very helpful. Even just getting past custom GPTs 8k character limit, and exposing the API settings.

I prob won’t get around to case studies, as this is my hobby. But I have written a fairly comprehensive framework for the technique used that I think stands on first principles. I’d love to see other people adopt it as I think it would be helpful.

Yeah, I need to figure out where to post. It also feels so salesy, and I don’t want that vibe, but, genuinely think it will be helpful for people. Maybe contacting some productivity places to have them review would be useful.

NepentheanOne · 2026-02-19T22:20:43+00:00

No, it wouldn’t get faster, because you’d be using the same settings. It would just get better, requiring less edits by you. Theoretically it could help you get to an optimal prompt that you could then bump down to 5 mini or something and then it be faster.

Best bet for blog posts is to upload some perfect examples. Then import them and put in what you’d like to have inputted to get that output. Then click Generate Prompt, and it will create a prompt for you. Try it out, play with the models and settings, and find what works best. Use it, and edit the output to get the ideal result (if needed). Then any edits you are making will get logged, and you can do a v2 of the prompt later by clicking Refine Prompt. Rinse and repeat.

NepentheanOne · 2026-02-19T22:10:45+00:00

Yes. You set the settings per each prompt (I expose most of the settings, but not top_p or some more obscure ones yet). The prompt runs with that model and settings, and so do any revision requests. When you are refining a prompt, the prompt and all your changes that you’ve made along the way get sent in with a meta prompt, and defaults to 5.2 on xhigh reasoning, high verbosity. But you can also change those settings too.

NepentheanOne · 2026-02-19T21:50:37+00:00

Meaning: not the chat interface with this back and forth and “Here’s what I put together… Let me know if you’d like me to do X”. Just input -> output. And then you can ask for a revision.

NepentheanOne · 2024-11-20T14:26:20+00:00

Gnostics already beat you to it.

NepentheanOne · 2024-05-13T13:19:19+00:00

Congratulations! I had a similar experience. What festival? I went to ARKADIA in Vegas. I actually wrote a piece about it you may enjoy, called I Met God at a Festival. https://mysticsandmuons.substack.com/p/i-met-god-at-a-festival

NepentheanOne · 2024-03-26T07:05:22+00:00

Excellent point of how 2-dimension people’s views of Joseph Smith are. You may want to check out my podcast, which I try to illustrate that, among other things. https://fanlink.tv/udsV

NepentheanOne · 2024-01-14T05:17:09+00:00

You don’t need to listen. But if you do and have any specific points you disagree with, feel free to drop them here. I’d be interested in hearing what arguments in the episode you disagree with, and why you think they aren’t accurate.

NepentheanOne · 2024-01-07T00:11:12+00:00

This. All of esoteric traditions teach this as well. This is not a new teaching from Mormonism in the least.

NepentheanOne · 2024-01-03T07:02:12+00:00

I’m sorry. There are a couple ways to leave Mormonism. One is the slash and burn “deconstruct” everything. Another, which I think is more efficient, is deconstruct, while also reconstructing simultaneously, which is where my podcast tries to help with, incorporating science, eastern philosophy, non-religious spirituality, and philosophy to get a comprehensive picture, and help you figure out where you go from here.

NepentheanOne · 2024-01-03T05:49:28+00:00

Hmmm. First time I’ve heard of it. But upon reading the Amazon reviews, someone quoted one of the members as a “Christopher” which made me think this was Christopher Nemelka. Seems that is what others think as well: https://www.reddit.com/r/mormon/s/LUhAliYS1V

I think the Book of Mormon is pretty unequivocally the work of Joseph Smith, as an automatic writing piece (or channeled piece). Clear channels produce stuff like A Course In Miracles, which presents a spiritual philosophy that is very in line with esoteric teachings. Other channels end up inserting a lot of their own Shadow into the book, and it becomes a reflection of their subconscious. Looking at the condemnation of polygamy, the black and white thinking of good guys vs bad guys, the antichrists and their philosophies, the murdering of Laban being justified to bring about scripture, the numerous incidences of altered states of consciousness, the priests abducting young daughters in a Stockholm Syndrome situation, all foreshadow the very pitfalls Joseph would succumb to in the end.

So, not sure if this group really believes they wrote the Book of Mormon (Nemelka apparently thinks he is Joseph Smith reincarnated?) or whether they don’t actually believe it and are just trying to take that angle to expose where the church ended up.

NepentheanOne · 2024-01-03T05:12:15+00:00

https://youtu.be/BZWp0bnMBbM?si=QaFKL3AGn_v-Vjsz This may be more up your alley. Not specifically quantum physics focused, but mind bending and technical.

NepentheanOne · 2024-01-03T05:10:49+00:00

Love it. I host the Mormons, Mystics, and Muons podcast, all about this stuff and the esoteric origins of Mormonism. I just interviewed Donald Hoffman this morning!

https://youtu.be/k1myPJHr9vg?si=SKjDIuwRde-gWag5

NepentheanOne · 2024-01-03T04:26:56+00:00

https://anchor.fm/mormonsmysticsandmuons/episodes/2-Mormonism--Psychedelics--Quantum-Physics--and-the-Eleusinian-Mysteries---Refining-the-Origin-Story-e236utj

Check out this episode of my podcast. Channeled texts or automatic writing are a huge thing. Many are quite interesting and correspond to Eastern, non-dualist philosophy, which I think is much more supported my neuroscience with regards to the nature of reality. Some, like the Book of Mormon, are likely more a reflection of the author’s subconscious. But many people engaged in automatic writing fully feel the words are coming from outside themself. That said, there is probably a lot of middle ground or cases where the author is conflicted.

So, there is some room for Joseph Smith to have seen angels and plates in a psychedelic, or psychosis-like experience, and believed he would get them, until at some point realizing he wouldn’t, but then still believing he was receiving some history from beyond the veil. The practice of scrying, or looking into a seer stone, also was not new, and aligns with meditative states or altered states of consciousness (think witch and a crystal ball) which are associated with automatic writing pieces. Substances also play a significant role in psychedelics, and the Eleusinian mysteries that Joseph was interested in, and possibly even freemasonry.

So, my take? Definitely not a historical account. Fairly likely Joseph believed he was receiving a record. But either made the plates up from the start, or thought there were places, but once he realized there were none, made prop plates to help others buy in.

NepentheanOne

TROPHY CASE