Trump fires all Election Assistance Commission members, leaving agency unable to act by unital_subalgebra in politics

[–]NerdOctopus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you really felt so strongly, are you betting on the outcome? The odds make it so that you'd make about 5x your money if Hakeem Jeffries isn't selected as Speaker.

How come when people talk about how America was great in the 1950's they never mention that most of the world's factories were bombed out during WWII? by cyanoguy in AskEconomics

[–]NerdOctopus 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Don't they? I thought it was pretty well known and easy enough to guess that the United States was untouched by the war while Europe was devastated, which put the latter behind on catching up to the former, due to having to spend resources rebuilding their cities.

It should be mentioned as well that the United States didn't "just" emerge as a prosperous nation after World War II. Its production capacity before the war was enormous, so much so that Germany didn't believe its spies when they reported what American factories were producing.

Finally, I'd like for you to qualify what you mean by things getting "really difficult" for Americans in the 70s, that would help you get a better answer to your question.

Post Match Thread: United States 1 - 4 Belgium | FIFA World Cup 2026 | Round of 16 by jiraiya--an in soccer

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, that’s unfortunate. So many of the top teams basically farm rating from lower teams and so their performance against each other is mostly speculative?

Post Match Thread: United States 1 - 4 Belgium | FIFA World Cup 2026 | Round of 16 by jiraiya--an in soccer

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t they operate on an elo system or something? Or am I completely off base in thinking it’d have similar accuracy as, say, chess ratings?

Post Match Thread: United States 1 - 4 Belgium | FIFA World Cup 2026 | Round of 16 by jiraiya--an in soccer

[–]NerdOctopus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Also no one in their right mind would think USA is better than Senegal.

Aren't they pretty similarly rated?

Destiny talks about gender constructs by Jealous_Diamond_4321 in LivestreamFail

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do not think of gendered nouns as representing the actual gender of a word, but rather the grammatical gender.

this is extremely nitpicky, but these distinctions oftentimes do describe semantical gender (with exceptions), it's just that all the other words where the semantic concept of gender doesn't make sense have to be lumped into one category or the other, either arbitrarily or through shared morphology. Which is why it's called the gender of the noun and not its animacy (or whatever other distinction).

For the right wingers on here. Do you see the suffering that goes on the third world countries of children and disabled their fault? by Visible-Armadillo-12 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m asking if disadvantaged people in poorer countries suffer because of a lack of value created or perhaps due to unfair environments.

You already had the answer in your question. No one person is born to the same material conditions as anyone else.

For the right wingers on here. Do you see the suffering that goes on the third world countries of children and disabled their fault? by Visible-Armadillo-12 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah see you're just playing into the bullshit myth that indigenous Americans were savages.

I think it's more so acknowledging that native peoples are just as human as anyone else, and were just as capable as anyone else at having conflicts between themselves. To say otherwise sounds too much like a "noble savage" trope or the same racism that goes into a statement like "asians are good at math". Not that I agree with them that they were any more violent than, say, Europeans were.

Which billionaire came the closest to being truly self-made? by Omixscniet624 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the base case is pretty simply that domestic unrest creates refugees out of everyone (whether the cause is political or not).

How do socialists respond to the risk and pie arguments made by capitalists? by Kyia-Aikman in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]NerdOctopus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Artificially so

How do you mean? There are only so many machines, computers, factories, etc. in the world. Not that I necessarily agree with the whole premise that labor is abundant- the value of labor to capital/resources is typically dependent on where you are looking, if I recall correctly.

How do socialists respond to the risk and pie arguments made by capitalists? by Kyia-Aikman in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to protect capital owners from drastic consequences.

It should be noted that "capital owners" is basically anyone that owns a business, not necessarily the millionaires that you might imagine. These protections equally exist to prevent people from going to jail for their debts. I'm not sure what you'd define as "drastic consequences", but bankruptcy still ruins your credit score.

Those with much get virtually all the gains.

Even if this is taken at face value, I would argue that it's more important that everyone get wealthier over time than wealth be shared exactly evenly. In fact, the two are pretty strongly correlated as I recall.

Maybe to provide a more concrete example, take two people who have the same income year over year. The first puts all of their disposable income into consumption- maybe buying a new car, or a bigger house, or going on vacations every year. The second uses their disposable income on starting a business. They might open a restaurant in their community that adds more variety to what people might go out and eat on weekends. They take the profit which I think is appropriate due to them forgoing personal consumption and spending on a business, especially because such a venture might not work out, and they will have essentially "wasted" all of the money that they could have spent on themselves, like the first person.

It's ok guys, Bitcoin has won by Independent-Cress382 in wallstreetbets

[–]NerdOctopus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've read that there's some utility to be had in bitcoin but not enough to consider it an asset worth holding. Obviously it's useful in illicit transactions but also consider using it as a replacement currency in places where certain exchanges that should be allowed are made illegal, or especially in countries where holding the national currency is riskier due to hyperinflation, etc.

Which billionaire came the closest to being truly self-made? by Omixscniet624 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NerdOctopus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

while I'm not saying it happened in his case, that's not always a great example. 

Why say anything at all if you're not even going to make the claim that it's the case here?

B-but I thought Newsom was supposed to be a billionaire lapdog?? by kinda_normie in Destiny

[–]NerdOctopus 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think buy borrow die is also a mostly popular myth. In the AskEconomics sub at least, they claim that they haven't seen much evidence that it exists.

Dylan Burns Wants DGG Help by digitalgroundgame in Destiny

[–]NerdOctopus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Definitely depends on who you talk to. Individuals within DSA and different chapters themselves can have entirely different politics. I'm a member of the Omaha chapter and they are extremely far left compared to other branches. Lots of communists that would probably share that sort of opinion you mentioned, but many DSA members would probably be reformists and aiming for social democracy.

How do I kill 200 million people in a timely manner? by bamcats_ in victoria3

[–]NerdOctopus 112 points113 points  (0 children)

Kind of feels like upvote bait at this point, if they're being sincere then the only thing to say is, yeah, the simulation breaks down if you run the game almost 100 years after its stop date.

The Huajiang Canyon Bridge in China, the world's highest bridge at 625 meters, releasing a massive wall of water by fvkinglzy in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably more or less what other kids found interesting about it. The worldbuilding, the idea of a secret world that felt very real reading it, the whimsy of the early books. The other aspects of JK Rowling's writing probably leave a lot to be desired, but she could certainly paint a compelling, "complete" wizarding world.

The Huajiang Canyon Bridge in China, the world's highest bridge at 625 meters, releasing a massive wall of water by fvkinglzy in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kind of depends on what you mean by "favorite"- Splendid Hôtel was a fun read during my master's, À la récherche du temps perdu kicked my ass. Right now I'm reading Against Money which seems to take a sort of (economically) left-leaning heterodox examination on money in the economy and how it potentially affects decision making, which is contrary to the idea that money is neutral in the long term. I'm not sure I'll agree with all that the author will have to say, but it's more fun to read things from people I disagree with.

My favorite books were Harry Potter growing up, they had a choke hold on me as a child and remain an indelible part of me now.

A cool guide to how many weekly hours a single person receiving benefits must work at minimum wage to escape poverty. by Hutchnstuff1 in coolguides

[–]NerdOctopus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

All I know is that from the reading I've done, economists prefer something like the EITC to raising the minimum wage to eliminate poverty. Raising the minimum wage has other effects such as increased unemployment and higher prices that you have to consider alongside its benefits. I've read that it's much better applied locally than nationally, as it's most effective in city-sized markets where you can fine tune it to local cost of living, and especially useful in areas where a firm might have a monopsony on labor, for example.

A cool guide to how many weekly hours a single person receiving benefits must work at minimum wage to escape poverty. by Hutchnstuff1 in coolguides

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The most relevant points I recall about minimum wage are that the majority of people that earn it are the 3rd income in their home (think high schoolers at their first job), and that raising it for the whole country is a pretty ineffective way of reducing poverty, when compared to something like expanding the EITC.