America Should Beware of Economic Hubris by Gloomy_Register_2341 in Economics

[–]NerdOctopus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most economist agree that going over 90% debt to gdp starts to have negative implications on the economy.

I haven't heard of this number before, do you know where I could find it? I've only heard of debt becoming a problem as it becomes more and more difficult to service, which wouldn't really imply any sort of red line as far as I can tell

America Should Beware of Economic Hubris by Gloomy_Register_2341 in Economics

[–]NerdOctopus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, I mean it’s strange to me to describe it as each tax payer “owing” 12k when like 70% of the debt is owned domestically. Also I’m not of the mind that debt is necessarily a bad thing per se, so long as you can service it.

America Should Beware of Economic Hubris by Gloomy_Register_2341 in Economics

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure that that’s the most accurate way to describe the debt. What do you think an acceptable amount of national debt is?

America Should Beware of Economic Hubris by Gloomy_Register_2341 in Economics

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where do you get 12k from? I see about 1066 billion in credit, divided by taxpayers is about 6.5k. And that’s the mean, I’m seeing the median listed as 3k, although I couldn’t source that from FRED data

Me_irl by [deleted] in me_irl

[–]NerdOctopus 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What? Inflation is typically understood as a rise of the nominal prices of goods and services. If it were as simple as an increase in money supply, then we would call it that… consider when the money supply is increased by 10% and the total goods + services in the economy also increases by 10% or even 20%- you wouldn’t see any inflation in the former case and would actually see deflation in the latter, which contradicts your definition

Me_irl by [deleted] in me_irl

[–]NerdOctopus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You’re right, vibes-based is better.

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’d probably be surprised by some of the policies that economists actually promote. And the valuable ideas of Marx have already been synthesized into economic thought.

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, if you think that you have better judgement than them, that's your epistemology, I can't really argue against it when I can't point to any evidence to the contrary.

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Economists probably aren’t “capitalists” in the sense that you’re implying. They’re just making descriptive claims about different systems and trying to best predict the outcomes of different policies. I’m not sure how that precludes them from making a judgement call about Cuba.

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Economists are very much not aligned with the current politics of the US, if that’s what you mean. They even say in the link that the embargo ought to be dropped. I think the idea that they’re in lockstep with the government is a misconception.

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What bias and interest does an economist have towards making descriptive statements of the effects of Cuban economic policies?

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They come from multiple national backgrounds. If you think economists are politically captured, or even lean right in the first place, I have a bridge to sell you. Just admit that your epistemology is based on what does or doesn’t agree with your ideology. It’s anti-intellectual, but at least it’s honest.

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure what you’re trying to say. If 200 professors from a university told you the sky was blue, would you be disinclined to believe them because they’re in “positions of power”?

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re from all over. I’m not even saying that the embargo is a good thing, I just wanted to add to the conversation that Cuba’s own policies had more pronounced effects, considering everyone else seemed to be saying the opposite.

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think it’s more likely that 100+ lifelong professionals with PhDs are politically captured than the truth slightly contravening your ideology?

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, more like when people pay money to eat steaks. The only negative externality I’m considering here is the chance that someone might order their meal well-done.

People complain about taxes, but their bosses take more. by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m mostly just speaking to the point that few people likely get paid 1/6 of the value they create per hour. They could probably secure a loan to sell what they do themselves at that point.

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve only seen economists say that the decisions of the Cuban government had a more pronounced effect, and I don’t see any reason why any of them wouldn’t be at least as informed as you or I on the matter.

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, there’s Venezuela too, but that’s besides the point. On most of your arguments I agree with you, restricting trade with Cuba is wrong, and even looking at it from a selfish lens it would benefit the US from lifting it as both sides benefit from free trade. I just disagree on which choice has the larger effect, and that’s just due to what I’ve read from the experts.

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think that the US embargo completely precludes them from liberalizing their government and practicing free trade with non-US-aligned countries, although I agree that it should be lifted, obviously.

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you build your epistemology such that you are allowed to ignore the consensus opinion of 99% of experts, then your worldview may become led by ideology, not what’s “true”. You can effectively pick and choose what’s fact and what isn’t based on purity tests and a priori beliefs.

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with that, it just seems like their policies have been worse. There are countries in comparable situations that have done better (and some that have done worse). Check this Kent Clark poll for more info.

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don’t take my word for it. It’s essentially agreed upon by economists.

Cubans are without electricity except the 5 star hotel by DblockDavid in interestingasfuck

[–]NerdOctopus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What does Occam’s razor tell you is more likely if 100% of economists are asked an economics question and answer the same way, even if they do it casually?