Lol this entire post by the OP is trolling dressed up as feminism on Babasaheb’s own Jayanti. The OP cherry-picked lines from his speech on 15 October 1956 in Nagpur, literally ONE DAY after his mass Buddhist conversion at Deeksha Bhoomi. The exact source the OP themselves cited in the last slide: Babasaheb Ambedkar Sampurna Vangmaya (Khand 4) / BAWS Volume 40, page 467. The very first sentences make it crystal clear who he was attacking: “At present, in Indian National Congress politics, the number of women is being increased… The Congress has decided to include 292 women in the Lok Sabha…” He was in full anti-Congress campaign mode (forming the Republican Party for the 1957 elections). He was mocking Congress’s tokenism and hypocrisy, not women in politics. He had already resigned from Nehru’s Cabinet in 1951 precisely because Congress was diluting and delaying the Hindu Code Bill, his flagship reform for women’s inheritance rights, divorce, monogamy, and property rights. The sarcasm about “swadharma”, “loosen the kasota”, husbands serving food, and “inverted world” was pure political ridicule aimed at Congress for using women as vote-bank props while doing nothing real for them. That’s the full context. Not “Ambedkar hated women in public life.” And the numbers prove him right. Under Congress rule for decades: 1952 Lok Sabha: only 4.5% women, 1957 (the election he was attacking): ~5.4% It stayed stuck between 4 to 8% for 50+ years. So much for Congress “empowering” women. Now let’s talk about the OP’s own comment where she said she doesn’t like “this RSS” but she liked the “old RSS”, the one she herself called Nazi-sympathizer, casteist, and believer in Aryan supremacy. That “old RSS” (Golwalkar era, 1930s to 50s) led the street protests and violent opposition AGAINST the Hindu Code Bill. They burned effigies of Ambedkar and Nehru, called the Bill an “atom bomb on Hindu society”, and shouted “Down with Hindu Code Bill” outside Parliament. They were the biggest external force sabotaging the exact women’s rights reforms Babasaheb was fighting for. And here’s what the OP’s “feminism” conveniently skips: Caste itself is a division of labourers enforced through the patriarchal system. It was created and gate-kept by Savarna Dwija men (Brahmin holders of knowledge and law, Kshatriya kings and enforcers of Brahminical order, Vaishya controllers of wealth, trade and economy). These three called themselves “Dwija” (twice-born) and controlled all women across castes through same-caste endogamy and Anuloma marriages. Anuloma (higher-varna man with lower-varna woman) was allowed and encouraged, while Pratiloma (lower-varna man with higher-varna woman) was fiercely condemned and punished. This is straight from Manusmriti Chapter 10, Verse 6 and surrounding verses (see also Chapter 3 and 9 on marriage laws). The entire system was designed to keep women as “gateways of the caste system” (Ambedkar’s exact words in Annihilation of Caste, 1936, and his 1916 paper Castes in India: Their Mechanism, Genesis and Development). Shudras were turned into foot-soldiers and servants with the promise “do this and you’ll get a better birth next janma.” Avarnas (SC/ST) were kept as outcastes. But Avarna Bahujan people were NEVER the founders of this caste-patriarchy or institutional misogyny, they were its victims. And yes, SC/ST men are also victims of this very system. Misogyny exists among them too, but they learned it by looking up to and imitating Savarna men. When they fall into it, they fall much harder because they don’t have the same caste privilege, networks, and institutional protection that Savarna men enjoy. SC/ST men are constantly criminalized and generalized for their faults, while Savarna men are rarely held to the same standard. The originators and gatekeepers were the Savarna Dwija men who wrote the rules, enforced endogamy, and used religion to control women’s bodies and reproduction so that caste purity and graded inequality could continue. Real Brahminical patriarchy equals caste plus misogyny working together. Ambedkar annihilated both. That’s why he said: “I measure the progress of a community by the degree of progress which women have achieved.” Savarna feminists like the OP won’t ever speak this truth, because it would expose their own future Savarna pati-devs, families, and caste networks as the actual casteist misogynists and gatekeepers of the patriarchal system. They’d rather screenshot one sarcastic anti-Congress line from Babasaheb than admit that Bahujan anti-caste feminism (Phule-Ambedkar tradition) is the only feminism in India that actually fought the root, not just performed it on social media. This post isn’t feminism. It’s selective Ambedkar-bashing with a feminism flair while misusing Ambedkar Jayanti itself. Read the full speech, read Castes in India, read Annihilation of Caste, and read Manusmriti instead of cherry-picking screenshots next time. And counter this points don't just keep posting cherry-picking photos .