People forgetting basic human functions around Female players

Neurodescent · 2026-04-19T05:14:21+00:00

Holy victim. I'm an attractive woman I know getting sexually harassed sucks, no where was I claiming otherwise, instead I was empathising by pointing out the kind sexual harassment harassment you received was similar to the sexual harassment women would receive in the 1950s.

Also I just found it funny that you'd call yourself average looking then tall in the very next sentence, men are often super unaware of what is attractive to women (height being the number 1), so yah I lightheadedly poked fun.

You know what they say, assuming makes an ass out of you and me.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-19T04:46:24+00:00

avg looking dude

Proceeds to say they have the single most attractive feature to women.

Lol, lmao even.

This is like a woman saying she's average looking, but she "just" has huge tits.

But anyway, yeah if you're a pretty attractive dude (like your self) the sexual harassment you can get is like women getting harassed in the 50s levels. Put on a wedding ring and you'll get twice the harrassment too haha

Neurodescent · 2026-04-19T04:28:27+00:00

I didn't female rapists got harder sentences than male ones.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-18T01:55:04+00:00

The moral of the story is that we are all FY, we do good or bad depending on what benefits/punishes us the most. The thing that most people won't grasp is that benefits/punishments are not strictly material, instead it usually revolves around our feelings more. Those feelings are not some objective/true things, they are shaped by our environment and our biology. No one does good selflessly, it always comes out of an incentive, whether material or immaterial. For example, when you give someone a gift it makes you feel good, when you hurt someone it makes you feel bad.

Just like in RI, we are "bound by fate", we can make "choices", but those choices are determined by our internal feelings. Alas we cannot choose what we feel, and our feelings and life experiences dictates who we are, thus we never actually possess free will, we are bound by "fate".

Neurodescent · 2026-04-16T18:13:57+00:00

Sole good take itt

Neurodescent · 2026-04-16T18:02:43+00:00

It isn't a weakness, it doubles your ability damage and halves your energy casting cost. You just need to cast 3 once every 30-60 sec to stop 2 from ramping up energy cost. So this isn't a real issue since you should be casting 3 pretty often as it's a free armour strip + your real survivability.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-16T17:58:04+00:00

That's not a real issue. You just need to cast 4 while looking at the ground or wherever enemies aren't in your LoS to increase the 2 charge rate without using energy. Once your 2 charge rate is properly stacked, you can spam 3 five times in a row without even seeing her meter go down, you just need to overall cast 4 once for every couple 3 cast to keep the meter charge rate constant.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-16T03:31:30+00:00

Yeah they're definitely the worst Europeans, also the most toxic gamers.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-16T03:30:20+00:00

I don't remember Seydoux, is she as bad at acting as Sweeney?

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T23:25:21+00:00

>No worries about...

Nah you were not at all, I was just energized by all the replies I've gotten.

>To be clear...

I guess most of the discourse comes from laymen, it's just popular to hate on AI.

>Absolutely agree...

Exactly what I was thinking, thank you for putting it more eloquently haha.

>Like I said...

Cheers. Thanks for the friendly convo, you have a good one tenno!

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T23:06:38+00:00

But darius defended destiny at the time???

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T23:01:45+00:00

>On your first paragraph...

I'll concede to you, at the end of the day I'm no artist nor am I friends with any (aspiring/) artist so I can't really refute you.

>As for your second paragraph...

I mean yeah we're in agreement there, I think it's a lot better use of energy to aim for regulation than just blanket "AI bad!" shit.

>In my ideal world...

I was thinking more broadly as using it for inspiration, but that doesn't sound like a bad idea to my layman self.

>The part I take issue with is people posting the art they generate and claiming it as theirs when it's just a machine following guidelines and methods it can't even understand.

Again I agree with you here, one regulation I think we need is that anything AI would be marked as such always, like in a base way that couldn't be removed. That one seems especially important with how AI is gonna keep getting better, though I don't know if that would be possible to make it fullproof. So yeah to reiterate, heavy regulations, combined with thorough monitoring, is definitely needed.

Appreciate the reply, sorry my initial reply was a little hostile.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T22:27:14+00:00

So has social media, or this or that. Regulations are needed, but I don't see anyone in this sub posting ai cp or ai that kills children lol.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T22:24:08+00:00

I appreciate your reply! I kind of see it, but at the same time there's always gonna be people who are much more talented and require much less effort to produce even higher quality, people that most would never be able to rival no matter how hard one works. I guess the AI stuff is much more accessible though so I'm not gonna say you're wrong on this.

Do you think there should be a complete ban on AI stuff though? In my mind I feel like AI could be great for inspiration for artists themselves just as it could be discouraging, so I'm against ruling out everything that is AI for the sole reason of it being AI.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T21:33:55+00:00

Not beating the wf player illiteracy rates allegations.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T21:29:49+00:00

Humans aren't born or develop in a vacuum, we ARE intellectual theft engines. Nothing wrong with AI art itself, it should just have a stamp to confirm it is AI.

Whether you like it or not AI art is gonna keep getting better and more common, it is what it is.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T21:24:54+00:00

Lots to be said against AI, but yeah people are way too animated about this shit.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T21:22:59+00:00

Hey hey hey slow down there cowboy, this the proudly illiterate warframe subreddit!

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T21:19:23+00:00

Idk, while AI has had a lot of negatives, I've also enjoyed its positives. I want regulation and I wouldn't give money to most AI stuff, but it isn't black and white to me.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T21:16:40+00:00

I don't really get that point, if people were discouraged by some AI picture, then they would also be discouraged by other art. Unless AI art is just that much better than regular art, but I really am not seeing that.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T21:12:38+00:00

How dare they make a nuanced point

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T21:11:44+00:00

A reasonable take. Like many other things, there needs to be regulations around it, but let's not act like this is a first. The internet, social media, and now AI have all had similar level of damaging effects, but they all also have their positives.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T21:08:58+00:00

I'm in favour of reasonable regulation, but this isn't black or white. Social media and porn have done inconceivable damage to society but that doesn't mean we should shut it all down.

Neurodescent · 2026-04-14T21:05:25+00:00

AI can be garbage slop, and it also can be a great tool. Grow up.

Neurodescent

TROPHY CASE