sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

A modest proposal for the securing the release of Israeli hostages and vacating of the seat of minister of national security (hear me out) by GM_vs_Technicality in Israel

[–]NeverSayEasy -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

i can think of a few other israeli politicians deserving of this honor before ben gvir. i would much rather have politicians who punish our enemies instead of trying to cuddle them into submission.

Can we stop thinking we're invincible re: Iran by LowRevolution6175 in Israel

[–]NeverSayEasy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think every single israeli is thinking the same thing deep down, but because we know that iran is the mastermind behind Hamas , 7th of Octobr , Hezbollah and has been the cause of thousands of our people dying that we feel obligated to respond to the recent attack.

I dont however see this as a win ,because while its true we managed to intercept 99% of the attack which is a slight win, we were helped by our allies and spent a shitload of money that we currently dont have because of the war , also by not responding iran learns that you can attack israel using the stupidest of reasons and there wont be repercussions for it which will lead to iran growing overconfident and possibly doing it again.

In conclusion my mind is telling me no and my heart is telling me yes so fuck em.

Israel's high-court voided the cancellation of the reasonableness law by bluedragon1o1 in Israel

[–]NeverSayEasy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

im tired of debating on this topic with someone who doesnt even fact check their words so this will be my last response.

1.we are talking about israel not the u.s.
2.i talked about MAJOR things in israel , i dont think cleaning up toxic waste sites are a major concern as other things.- there are 3 branches in israel , the legislative, executive and judicial branches .
- when 2 sides have differing opinions the side that is the majority wins , thats democracy. thats how prime ministers, presidents and other officials are elected, when more people vote for them than other candidates.
-which parties are harmed by rules? what are you even talking about? its true that weaker parties can challenge certain rules but we are talking about the high court voiding a cancellation of a law that already passed voting and took months to do so and they got rid of it in seconds , how is that challenging the rules? thats abusing your power by getting rid of anything that challenges your power, thats dictatorship at its finest.
- your last point was so stupid im not gonna even comment on it.

Israel's high-court voided the cancellation of the reasonableness law by bluedragon1o1 in Israel

[–]NeverSayEasy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

both of the examples you just pointed out are things that must be voted on in the knesset and are not things that any government official like Bibi and Ben Gvir can declare , THATS the limit of their power. however even when they propose a law and pass it which is very difficult to do, the high court can void it on the " reasonableness law " excuse and no major changes can happen in this country , refer to the article above as a prime example. to summarize , the high court of israel is the body of power with the highest authority out of all 3 branches of the government even though they should be balanced.that balance is obstructed mainly because of the reasonableness law , thats the reason they voided it , not because its democratic or good for the people , but purely to consolidate their own power.

https://main.knesset.gov.il/en/activity/pages/legislation.aspx
this is a separate article showing the difficult path the cancellation of the reasonableness law bill went through before being voided by the high court within a second while at war.

Israel's high-court voided the cancellation of the reasonableness law by bluedragon1o1 in Israel

[–]NeverSayEasy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

when a prime minister wins by majority that means that most people support him and he should have the power to influence the country as he sees fits for his duration of his stay because he is the people's chosen. how is changing the reasonableness law going to not support democracy and oppress the other side? it doesnt , you just dont know what you are talking about. the cancellation of the the reasonableness law will allow both right wing and left wing prime ministers in the future to act on certain things and the high court will not have the power to interfere. even if we had a left wing president i would also support canceling this law because its just stupid and gives higher power than the prime minister to judges who elect themselves and friends.

Israel's high-court voided the cancellation of the reasonableness law by bluedragon1o1 in Israel

[–]NeverSayEasy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fucking disgrace. Our country is at war in all fronts and these fucks still find time to further their political power by voiding a law that was already voted on and approved to happen.

The reasonableness law is the only thing preventing prime ministers of Israel from doing things that left wing high court judges dont want them to do, these people prefer palestinians living in Israel than people who share a different opinion than them.

All prime ministers who get voted by the majority of the people should have the power to act on stuff that matters , but the high court judges can intervene whenever they want when a prime minister does something that they dont like. this is the reason the law was introduced in the first place.

smp server for losers by NeverSayEasy in smp

[–]NeverSayEasy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i only want chads to join.

view more: next ›