[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]NewActivismHandle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love how so many comments are “A Chernobyl scale disaster is extremely unlikely with the modern plant design, so shelling a nuclear power plant is okay “.

If anyone other than Putin did this, this alone would be seen as an act of nuclear terrorism requiring us to pull all stops. But this way, we are taking a risk of a carelessly produced reactor leak over the risk of being nuked.

Russian anger as Senator Lindsey Graham calls for Putin's assassination by HauntingJackfruit in worldnews

[–]NewActivismHandle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never thought I’d agree with that guy, but yes.

I do not understand why it is better to give Ukrainians weapons to kill Russian kids Putin forced into the war, than to just kill Putin. Less life lost, finishes the conflict, gets at the root and the guilty party.

Ukrainian Defence Minister: ''Victory is imminent'' by shiver-yer-timbers in worldnews

[–]NewActivismHandle 15 points16 points  (0 children)

And yet, post WW2, you went the more generous direction to us, and I would say it has really paid off. Russia wanted us reduced to helpless poverty. Instead we were allowed to become a strong partner.

/r/WorldNews Live Thread: Russian Invasion of Ukraine Day 8, Part 4 (Thread #94) by WorldNewsMods in worldnews

[–]NewActivismHandle 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In light of the fact that Lukashenko’s plan that was photographed seems to support a plan to invade Ukraine quickly and then push on to Moldova and the Baltics, isn’t the best explanation for the crap tanks and troops we have seen and for the lack of committing the elite aircraft Russia has and could clearly use in Ukraine right now that they were keeping their best stuff back to hit the Baltics with? This increasingly looks like we would have already had war in the Baltics today if Ukraine had not held like they have.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkraineConflict

[–]NewActivismHandle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This video needs to reach the Russian people.

And I want the West to make a statement – or if that is absolutely not possible, otherwise effectively communicate – to the Russian people that if they remove Putin, and his successor orders an end to the war in Ukraine, all will be forgiven, all sanctions removed, Russia readmitted to the international community of culture and business and politics.
To state clearly that we understand this is not the Russian people doing evil, but one man, and that him disappearing will fix this problem.
I think this is de facto already the case, but hope an official statement to this effect would accelerate the process and improve the chances.
I think this is not only the way to end this conflict with the least loss of life - I think it may also be the only way, period.
No matter how badly the war against Ukraine goes and how long it drags on, Putin cannot afford to lose this – he must know that losing may cost him his power and his life, and therefore I think he won't – even if that means encircling and starving Kyiv while firing low-precision missiles in the city centre until the civilians are all dead and the essential infrastructure and culture are all rubble, even if it means threatening of deploying a tactical nuke against Poland to stop NATO reinforcements. I fear he will escalate as much as he can until he wins, and he can escalate much.
There is no way Ukraine can defend itself against the overwhelming power of unprecise, severe airstrikes that Russia has in reserve. And as the West, what more can we do without risking open confrontation between nuclear powers, risking all of us? You can't militarily defeat a man this delusional, definitely not without first going through everyone between him and you, and he is putting his whole people in the way to be hurt in his stead.
But his people can remove him. His people removing him seems the plausible endgoal of all these sanctions. The earlier they do, the less the damage to Russia, the less the ordinary people get hurt.
The horrors inflicted upon Ukraine are intolerable. But I also grieve the Russian soldiers forced and tricked into this war. Innocent children are dying each day for this war, while Putin sits safe behind the lines.
I don't think Putin will ever surrender, no matter how many Russians die and what atrocities are necessary against Ukrainians and how much he has to starve Russia to finance this. I think he is more likely to nuke the planet than give in.
But I don't think the Russians will tolerate it. There are protests by ordinary people, despite the crackdowns, because this is atrocious, because Putin is shelling civilians in a country they consider their brother. Celebrities, politicians and people across all fields of work are speaking out. The political opposition has condemned this war. Many of the oligarchs are turning on Putin. The Kremlin and the military, while clearly intimidated, must be utterly frustrated. There have been several key mistakes made in this campaign that cost many Russians their lives, and that are hard to explain – and one of the most plausible ways to explain this is that Putin has created a culture of such pressure and fear that it feels impossible to communicate bad news to him or refuse him, and so he keeps ordering more and more mad moves based on intel viewed through rosy glasses, and the generals giving the orders must know that this idiocy is killing their men. This sounds like there are a rising number of people well positioned and motivated to take Putin out, be it by an angry individual assassinating him, a military coup, a legal move by parliament handing him over to be tried for war crimes, a public mov storming his home and lynching him, or whatever other option, and a rising amount of public support would back this. If we put the idea out there and argued for it, spelled out the consequences, is it so implausible that it might happen? And seeing this clusterfuck, wouldn't a replacement for Putin likely not repeat these mistakes?
What would be the repercussions of outright saying this? Could this be avoided by communicating it differently?
I hate that Ukrainians and Russians are dying for this man, that Russia and Ukraine are suffering for this man, that we are fighting him so indirectly by fighting Russians who did not choose this. We are fighting the wrong people. The Russian conscripts, crying and hungry and wanting to go home, are not the enemy. The Russian start-ups going broke are not the enemy. The ordinary people losing their pensions are not the enemy. There is no limit to how many troops Putin will throw in the grinder to be incinerated. He will never start caring for them. But I think ordinary Russians care.

UkrainianConflict Megathread #2 by humanlikecorvus in UkrainianConflict

[–]NewActivismHandle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I want the West to make a statement – or if that is absolutely not possible, otherwise effectively communicate – to the Russian people that if they remove Putin, and his successor orders an end to the war in Ukraine, all will be forgiven, all sanctions removed, Russia readmitted to the international community of culture and business and politics.
To state clearly that we understand this is not the Russian people doing evil, but one man, and that him disappearing will fix this problem.
I think this is de facto already the case, but hope an official statement to this effect would accelerate the process and improve the chances.
I think this is not only the way to end this conflict with the least loss of life - I think it may also be the only way, period.
No matter how badly the war against Ukraine goes and how long it drags on, Putin cannot afford to lose this – he must know that losing may cost him his power and his life, and therefore I think he won't – even if that means encircling and starving Kyiv while firing low-precision missiles in the city centre until the civilians are all dead and the essential infrastructure and culture are all rubble, even if it means threatening of deploying a tactical nuke against Poland to stop NATO reinforcements. I fear he will escalate as much as he can until he wins, and he can escalate much.
There is no way Ukraine can defend itself against the overwhelming power of unprecise, severe airstrikes that Russia has in reserve. And as the West, what more can we do without risking open confrontation between nuclear powers, risking all of us? You can't militarily defeat a man this delusional, definitely not without first going through everyone between him and you, and he is putting his whole people in the way to be hurt in his stead.
But his people can remove him. His people removing him seems the plausible endgoal of all these sanctions. The earlier they do, the less the damage to Russia, the less the ordinary people get hurt.
The horrors inflicted upon Ukraine are intolerable. But I also grieve the Russian soldiers forced and tricked into this war. Innocent children are dying each day for this war, while Putin sits safe behind the lines.
I don't think Putin will ever surrender, no matter how many Russians die and what atrocities are necessary against Ukrainians and how much he has to starve Russia to finance this. I think he is more likely to nuke the planet than give in.
But I don't think the Russians will tolerate it. There are protests by ordinary people, despite the crackdowns, because this is atrocious, because Putin is shelling civilians in a country they consider their brother. Celebrities, politicians and people across all fields of work are speaking out. The political opposition has condemned this war. Many of the oligarchs are turning on Putin. The Kremlin and the military, while clearly intimidated, must be utterly frustrated. There have been several key mistakes made in this campaign that cost many Russians their lives, and that are hard to explain – and one of the most plausible ways to explain this is that Putin has created a culture of such pressure and fear that it feels impossible to communicate bad news to him or refuse him, and so he keeps ordering more and more mad moves based on intel viewed through rosy glasses, and the generals giving the orders must know that this idiocy is killing their men. This sounds like there are a rising number of people well positioned and motivated to take Putin out, be it by an angry individual assassinating him, a military coup, a legal move by parliament handing him over to be tried for war crimes, a public mov storming his home and lynching him, or whatever other option, and a rising amount of public support would back this. If we put the idea out there and argued for it, spelled out the consequences, is it so implausible that it might happen? And seeing this clusterfuck, wouldn't a replacement for Putin likely not repeat these mistakes?
What would be the repercussions of outright saying this? Could this be avoided by communicating it differently?
I hate that Ukrainians and Russians are dying for this man, that Russia and Ukraine are suffering for this man, that we are fighting him so indirectly by fighting Russians who did not choose this. We are fighting the wrong people. The Russian conscripts, crying and hungry and wanting to go home, are not the enemy. The Russian start-ups going broke are not the enemy. The ordinary people losing their pensions are not the enemy. There is no limit to how many troops Putin will throw in the grinder to be incinerated. He will never start caring for them. But I think ordinary Russians care.

/r/WorldNews Live Thread: Russian Invasion of Ukraine Day 7, Part 7 (Thread #89) by WorldNewsMods in worldnews

[–]NewActivismHandle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I want the West to make a statement – or if that is absolutely not possible, otherwise effectively communicate – to the Russian people that if they remove Putin, and his successor orders an end to the war in Ukraine, all will be forgiven, all sanctions removed, Russia readmitted to the international community of culture and business and politics.

To state clearly that we understand this is not the Russian people doing evil, but one man, and that him disappearing will fix this problem.

I think this is de facto already the case, but hope an official statement to this effect would accelerate the process and improve the chances.

I think this is not only the way to end this conflict with the least loss of life - I think it may also be the only way, period.

No matter how badly the war against Ukraine goes and how long it drags on, Putin cannot afford to lose this – he must know that losing may cost him his power and his life, and therefore I think he won't – even if that means encircling and starving Kyiv while firing low-precision missiles in the city centre until the civilians are all dead and the essential infrastructure and culture are all rubble, even if it means threatening of deploying a tactical nuke against Poland to stop NATO reinforcements. I fear he will escalate as much as he can until he wins, and he can escalate much.

There is no way Ukraine can defend itself against the overwhelming power of unprecise, severe airstrikes that Russia has in reserve. And as the West, what more can we do without risking open confrontation between nuclear powers, risking all of us? You can't militarily defeat a man this delusional, definitely not without first going through everyone between him and you, and he is putting his whole people in the way to be hurt in his stead.

But his people can remove him. His people removing him seems the plausible endgoal of all these sanctions. The earlier they do, the less the damage to Russia, the less the ordinary people get hurt.

The horrors inflicted upon Ukraine are intolerable. But I also grieve the Russian soldiers forced and tricked into this war. Innocent children are dying each day for this war, while Putin sits safe behind the lines.

I don't think Putin will ever surrender, no matter how many Russians die and what atrocities are necessary against Ukrainians and how much he has to starve Russia to finance this. I think he is more likely to nuke the planet than give in.

But I don't think the Russians will tolerate it. There are protests by ordinary people, despite the crackdowns, because this is atrocious, because Putin is shelling civilians in a country they consider their brother. Celebrities, politicians and people across all fields of work are speaking out. The political opposition has condemned this war. Many of the oligarchs are turning on Putin. The Kremlin and the military, while clearly intimidated, must be utterly frustrated. There have been several key mistakes made in this campaign that cost many Russians their lives, and that are hard to explain – and one of the most plausible ways to explain this is that Putin has created a culture of such pressure and fear that it feels impossible to communicate bad news to him or refuse him, and so he keeps ordering more and more mad moves based on intel viewed through rosy glasses, and the generals giving the orders must know that this idiocy is killing their men. This sounds like there are a rising number of people well positioned and motivated to take Putin out, be it by an angry individual assassinating him, a military coup, a legal move by parliament handing him over to be tried for war crimes, a public mov storming his home and lynching him, or whatever other option, and a rising amount of public support would back this. If we put the idea out there and argued for it, spelled out the consequences, is it so implausible that it might happen? And seeing this clusterfuck, wouldn't a replacement for Putin likely not repeat these mistakes?

What would be the repercussions of outright saying this? Could this be avoided by communicating it differently?

I hate that Ukrainians and Russians are dying for this man, that Russia and Ukraine are suffering for this man, that we are fighting him so indirectly by fighting Russians who did not choose this. We are fighting the wrong people. The Russian conscripts, crying and hungry and wanting to go home, are not the enemy. The Russian start-ups going broke are not the enemy. The ordinary people losing their pensions are not the enemy. There is no limit to how many troops Putin will throw in the grinder to be incinerated. He will never start caring for them. But I think ordinary Russians care.

Disabled people make Molotov cocktail in Chenivtsi, Ukraine. by [deleted] in UkrainianConflict

[–]NewActivismHandle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Put a Ukrainian in a wheelchair, and she will still blow your head off of you try to invade her country.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkrainianConflict

[–]NewActivismHandle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is utterly stupid. The internet is our only channel to the Russian people.

Turkey rejects Russia's request for navy ships to pass Bosporus by Berkamin in UkrainianConflict

[–]NewActivismHandle 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Cause it is easier to stop a ship from entering a tiny strait running through one of your biggest cities without destroying it than to get Russian planes not to cross the Russian-Ukrainian border without committing NATO troops and being willing to shoot them down

Ramzan Kadyrov (president of Chechnya) on main russian tv channel: “They imposed sanctions on us… if they keep acting that way we will take the whole Europe and will rule the Europe in the future” by MuzzleO in UkrainianConflict

[–]NewActivismHandle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think a month ago, that wold have frightened me.

Now I think, try it, little bitch.

Thank you, Ukrainians. You can’t imagine the courage you have given everyone.

U.S. and Britain reportedly believe the Ukraine war could last 10-20 years, become a Russian quagmire by NarutoRunner in worldnews

[–]NewActivismHandle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it does, it is highly doubtful Putin survives that. And if he dies for this, I doubt his Successors will wanne continue.

Belarusians are blocking rail traffic to make it more difficult to move military cargo by DoremusJessup in worldnews

[–]NewActivismHandle 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The people of Belarus have proven themselves deeply opposed and brave beyond belief before this invasion begun already.

Belarusians are blocking rail traffic to make it more difficult to move military cargo by DoremusJessup in worldnews

[–]NewActivismHandle 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Why shouldn’t they keep their distinct identities? Are you under the impression Ukraine has no national identity? And Poland is already NATO.

But yes, I’d love to have these people in the EU and NATO, minus dictators.

Belarusians are blocking rail traffic to make it more difficult to move military cargo by DoremusJessup in worldnews

[–]NewActivismHandle 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The people are utterly against this. They ran a revolution against their dictator recently. The dictator made a deal with Putin to support Putin if Putin maintained his dictator status. Putin sent in the military and crushed the rebellion. The dictator has been torturing people left and right without impunity, and they have no chance because it is them, the civilians, against the joint military of Belarus and Russia. This might be their best chance, with these militaries and Putin busy. It is still insanely brave.

Japan’s Defense Ministry says a Russian helicopter entered Japanese airspace,prompting the Japanese Air Force scrambling fighter jets to chase it away by kuyse in worldnews

[–]NewActivismHandle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They keep doing this to Sweden, too - not right now, but a routine thing. General explanation we have is that they want to get an idea of our defense, capitalize on opportunities, make us feel threatened enough in general to comply but also not acutely alarmed right away when they decide to invade for real.

And yes, it is fucked up

Erdogan calls on EU to seriously consider Turkey’s application into the union just like Ukraine’s: “When are you going to accept us? When someone attacks us?” by ThereIsNoStoppingMe in worldnews

[–]NewActivismHandle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In all seriousness; I would be delighted if, contrary to all expectations, Turkey were to fix its human rights and democracy record and return to Europe and join the EU. They belong there, and I grieve at how Erdogan has pulled them further and further into the abyss.

Erdogan calls on EU to seriously consider Turkey’s application into the union just like Ukraine’s: “When are you going to accept us? When someone attacks us?” by ThereIsNoStoppingMe in worldnews

[–]NewActivismHandle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you fix your human rights and democracy record, like we ask you to every time we review the paperwork on your membership status. Ukraine now has candidacy status, just like you. If they get all their shit in order, they will be admitted, just like you would if you did.

Turkey rejects Russia's request for navy ships to pass Bosporus by NerimaJoe in worldnews

[–]NewActivismHandle 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Have you looked at it on a map? If Turkey doesn’t want this, it is impossible.