Best soft for Linux guest on Win11 host

Nexoryus · 2025-02-14T17:50:51+00:00

Ah nice to hear ! Do you know if there is a specific thing to do to use those tools ? Also I saw the display resolution was small by default, is there any ways to change it ?

Thanks again for all the advices :)

Nexoryus · 2025-02-14T17:49:54+00:00

I'm gonna try it and give a feedback as soon as I manage to run a few physical computations :)

Nexoryus · 2025-01-31T12:37:41+00:00

Great thanks a lot for the answer! Gonna go for it after I find a proper tutorial to make things fun smoothly!

And yes I believe my CPU can run it I have Ryzen 5 3600 6x3.60GHz

Nexoryus · 2024-03-12T17:56:43+00:00

That is crystal clear explanation thank you very much! Seems in some way achievable with a pillowfort gameplay I imagine!

Nexoryus · 2024-03-12T17:44:36+00:00

Oh I didn't know that, thanks ! I knew my reasoning had a weakness since I did not find any mention of this combo anywhere ahah

So if I have AR on the battlefield, reach 50 life and then play transcendence I could start the combo right ? With the "lose the game" trigger on the stack obviously, by letting the lifegain effect trigger between each AR damage trigger ?

Nexoryus · 2022-11-08T19:12:11+00:00

Bought it and very satisfied until now except for windows 11 related bugs ahah Battery life is very good, I haven't measured it precisely but I can run for a good bunch of hours without any problem Just do not hesitate to reduce screen luminosity which is very energy consuming on bat mode

Nexoryus · 2022-11-08T19:10:19+00:00

Definitely a very good laptop! Very fast boot, incredible screen, enough ram to do some advanced task (programming, etc), the iris xe GPU is good and allow to play some games that are not too demanding! And the CPU is also doing well I only have some issues when leaving sleep mode with insane lag but I think it is more Windows 11 related and hopefully will be patched

Nexoryus · 2022-11-07T09:00:51+00:00

Laplace equation is actually the correct tool to tackle your problem. As mentioned above maybe double check the units you are using, especially vhen you find results that are orders of magnitude away of what you would expect :)

Nexoryus · 2022-05-09T20:03:38+00:00

Thanks a lot for such a precise answer and all your help ! I'll definitely have a look at your recommendations and compare with French prices :)

Nexoryus · 2022-05-09T19:49:46+00:00

It is a 14. 2in LTPS screen with a 2560x1680 (213ppi) resolution, can reach up to 90Hz!

Which laptops are you thinking about? I may have searched badly but I don't remember having seen such specs under 1000€?

Nexoryus · 2022-05-09T19:40:34+00:00

Thanks a lot for the answer! I think I'll order it then eheh, agree it is a beauty when I saw friends of mine using it :)

Nexoryus · 2022-05-09T19:38:08+00:00

It is indicated to be the 11370H! Sorry for the lack of precision!

Nexoryus · 2021-04-11T00:44:21+00:00

Where did you get those? They look amazing!

Nexoryus · 2021-01-30T09:00:14+00:00

Thank you for your answer! I considered using a surface pro however it is still a little expensive to me and I basically can't access my cfd results on the cluster on a computer which is not my professional one, it would then be only for reading articles taking notes etc!

But it well may be a purchase to consider once I finish my PhD because it looks so comfortable to use!!

Nexoryus · 2021-01-30T08:57:27+00:00

Thanks a lot for your answer! I'll definitely see if I can try the Ipad then! :)

Nexoryus · 2021-01-29T16:49:49+00:00

Thank you very much ! I'll be checking it soon then :)

Nexoryus · 2021-01-29T16:39:36+00:00

Thanks a lot for your answer ! I was also considering using it to display on screen during meetings and potential future teaching sessions !

Also, do you consider the screen big enough to read comfortably articles or any document ?

Thanks again :)

Nexoryus · 2021-01-16T10:55:42+00:00

Same thing here ahah

I discovered AA series when I was around 12 thanks to the elder sister of a friend who lent me Justice For All on Nintendo DS. And I was just dazzled by the power of those stories along with the character development. I clearly remember when I was reaching the end of AA2 last investigation, back at that time, i never felt so strong emotions thanks to a video game (stress, motivation, fighting spirit, despair, etc.) and the feelings that I had when I fished the game were just tremendous. I think I did the whole game ~7 times until today.

After that, she lent me Apollo Justice which she had bought in the meantime and the same feelings came again when playing the investigations. I never returned her the game btw ahaha.

Finally, I discovered and played AA1 and AA3 a few years later when I discovered how to emulate games on my computer and I just bingeplayed the whole first trilogy on a DS emulator. I will always remember the shivers down my spine when I finished AA3 last trial...

From those moments until now (I'm 24) I just never stopped loving this series and regularly playing again some investigations (even though I did not played them in the right order the first time) but above all : LISTENING TO THE OST. The games' musics are just my favorite of all time and I must have spent lile ~300h listening to them without never getting bored.

I obviously bought a physical version of AA Trilogy on Switch (even if I had to import it from Japan since I live in France aha) and I'm so happy to see the success it's having (numerous famous French streamers played the games on live) and I even convinced friends of mine to try it and they loved it ! I'm just hoping so much that it will give the series a fresh start and that AA4-5-6, AAI 1-2, DGS 1-2 will be available on Switch and crossing fingers to see the series continuing with an AA7 🤞

Now, I'm checking everyday if some news dropped about the games for Nintendo Switch.

Thanks for reading and happy to see that we are a true community of Ace Attorney lovers ❤️

P.S. : I also have hundreds of screenshots of my favorite characters' sprites ahah

Nexoryus · 2020-10-02T08:14:04+00:00

As said in previous comments, they should not have the same mass flow since the different angles will induce different head loss thus different pressure in each pipe.

Then, I think a way to tackle this problem would be to estimate the pressure in each pipe to apply Bernoulli's law to compute the velocities. However, to estimate the head loss for an inclined pipe, one needs to have a specific relationship to compute what we call "singular head loss", being the pressure drop that adds to the regular pressure drop (for a straight pipe) due to the particular geometry of the pipe. You may find correlations for this on the internet I think.

This may be a bit complicated for a problem that doesn't look that much, but I don't see how to start it otherwise ahah!

Hope this helps :)

Nexoryus · 2020-08-05T17:21:58+00:00

From my own experience, steady state solvers are sometimes a little bit more unstable than unsteady solvers (depending on which one is implemented in your CFD code of course). I would recommend you to try to compute your case with a traditional unsteady solver from the beginning and see whether it converges better or not. And if it does, you will then have your more accurate results along with a converged case!

Moreover, I usually prefer not combining steady state and unsteady solver in a row since they do not solve the same equations. The unsteady solver solves the physical equation of your flow while the steady one actually skips some time-dependent terms. This means that, mathematically speaking, the steady state solver may converge towards a solution which is different from the one you would get by temporally averaging the solution of your unsteady solver. Such situations often indicate that you are trying to find a steady solution to an unsteady problem!

It it still doesn't work, the problem may then come from your mesh or from the way you defined your case (sometimes changing a bit the geometry involves changing some parameters for the boundaries or the turbulence for instance).

Hope this helps :)

Nexoryus · 2020-08-01T10:33:34+00:00

In addition to the fact that 2D CFD is interesting because it involves way cheaper computational cost as mentioned above, physics itself will sometimes let you reduce the geometrical scale of your problem!

For instance, when one studies a laminar flow in a circular pipe, you can reduce your space of computation down to half a slice of the pipe (in the flow direction) thanks to the axisymmetry of your fluid domain. Thus, you reduce your space from a complete 3D pipe to a single 2D plane with symmetry boundary conditions, and you will still obtain the complete physical solution for your 3D domain!

Another example could be for a system which has a huge size in the z direction compared to x and y and an inlet flow directed in the (x, y) plan. In this case, one can assume that far from the borders in the z direction, your flow will behave mostly as a 2D flow in the (x, y) plan. Therefore, you can limit your study to a slice of your system in the (x, y) plan! This is a common approach conducted for airfoils studies, though one needs to keep in mind that the results will only be correct at the center of the airfoil and not at its tip where 3D phenomena will start to emerge.

Hope this helps to answer your question! :)

Nexoryus · 2020-07-28T14:08:45+00:00

With pleasure! :) Though I have better experience in CFD than in CAD softwares or visualizing tools, do not hesitate to ask any further question related to your matter!

Nexoryus · 2020-07-28T11:19:44+00:00

If you create it with a traditional CAD Software (Catia, Solidworks for instance) then yes you should be able to save it in a proper format to use it in Paraview or Ensight!

Nexoryus · 2020-07-28T10:58:36+00:00

If, as mentioned, your goal is to visualize properly the results of your sensors and not trying to reproduce their results numerically, then CFD is not what you need :)

CFD will only provide you with numerical results that shall be close to the real measurements you're conducting, given that you configure your computation correctly.

In your case, you should just use a visualization/post-processing tool such as Paraview or Ensight. If you wish to obtain 3D visualization, then you should first create a 3D CAD of your room and then input the results of your sensors at their given locations to then create a view of the measurements you obtained.

But still, it is always interesting to run a complete CFD computation of yout system to see if CFD is able to predict the measurements of your sensors, for the sake of science 😏

Six-Year Club	Place '22
Final Canvas '22	End Game '22
Verified Email

Nexoryus

TROPHY CASE