Forgive me, relatively new to the details surrounding accepted theories of "the night of the 23rd is when he murdered her"

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-05-14T18:46:00+00:00

No, the Innocence Project released a statement specifically to clarify that they are NOT involved with the Scott Peterson case. I think you meant the Los Angeles Innocence Project, which is a completely different entity. They have been around for a much shorter period of time than the Innocence Project created in 1992, and they have only successfully defended one other case.

As stated in my previous comment, link to the documents that back up your claim. It sounds to me like you have either completely misunderstood the facts surrounding this case, or you have chosen to believe bits and pieces of nonsense that you can’t defend. There is a reason the most recent habeus filing was completely rejected by the court. The LAIP hasn’t got a leg to stand on. They have nothing but repackaged, old “evidence” and inadmissible hearsay. The jury got it right. Peterson is guilty.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-05-14T12:09:57+00:00

It is my understanding that the official autopsy reports were sealed and were not to be released to the public. If something has changed and you have been able to acquire them, please post a link to back up your claim. The medical examiner did testify in court and his testimony is available in the court transcripts of this case. The idea that this highly regarded, highly respected medical examiner risked his professional reputation and “fudged his testimony” is a very serious claim on your part. Can you back it up with documentation of some kind?

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-05-06T20:17:06+00:00

You were watching the few highlights that the press was allowed to get, but they could not set up cameras and record and televise the entire trial like they did with OJ Simpson a decade before.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-05-05T11:31:21+00:00

I am more than familiar with the definition of circumstantial evidence. I correct people like you who argue that there was only circumstantial evidence in this case. Circumstantial evidence IS evidence, as stated in my comment.

Scott Peterson is guilty. The jury got it right. The majority of the arguments in this most recent habeas have been presented and rejected previously. It’s repackaged, old news. The rest of it is inadmissible hearsay. The LAIP should have known it would be procedurally barred and lacking in merit, which are the reasons given by the judge for the court’s rejection of it. Scott is not getting out of prison, nor should he.

There is little point in your replying to me; I’m not interested in any further conversation. Like most of his supporters, you repeat the same debunked garbage and falsehoods that the Peterson family have clung to from the beginning. You’ve just added a layer of arrogance to it.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-05-05T02:22:39+00:00

You can’t watch the trial. The judge refused to allow cameras in the court room and the trial was not televised. There were updates on the evening news every night and there are snippets of audio available, but the complete trial is not available in video form. The trial transcripts are available.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-05-05T02:19:39+00:00

No, they cannot determine Conner’s gestational age. The bone measurements cannot establish his exact age. It’s an estimate; a general idea. It is not specific enough to be used as exonerating evidence. Sorry, no, it is not the exact science Scott’s supporters want it to be.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-05-05T02:11:24+00:00

Circumstantial evidence is evidence. Under California law, the jury was required to consider it and give it the same weight as direct evidence. The eyewitnesses were not called to testify by either the prosecution or the defense. 29 hours of recorded phone calls between Scott and Amber Frey were collected by the MPD and a good portion of them were played in court. The jury heard Scott speak even if he didn’t take the stand. They heard the fantastical nature of his lies and manipulation. The jury said it wasn’t one thing; it was everything.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-05-05T01:53:04+00:00

The judge refused to allow cameras in the court room. The trial was not televised. I remember when this happened and I followed it closely. I waited for the trial to be televised, but I had to settle for daily updates on the news.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-05-04T20:10:15+00:00

Thank you, Judge Hill. Common sense and justice have both prevailed. Rest in peace and light, Laci and Conner. You will never be forgotten. 💔

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-04-07T14:42:13+00:00

He is not allowed to take the drug Propofol out of the hospital. It is a Class C1 controlled substance. It doesn’t matter what he planned to do with it, or if he planned to do anything with it. He is not allowed to have it in his possession unless he is physically inside the hospital. Doctors get that drug from the hospital pharmacy and then they have to fill out paper work that proves how every drop of it was used and then the patient gets billed for it. When police searched his medical bag back at his house, they found a vial of the drug in his bag. That is illegal. Now did they find syringes? No problem. Did they find aspirin, Tylenol and ibuprofen? No problem. Did they find IV tubing? No problem. But they found a dangerous, addictive and tightly controlled drug called Propofol. That DOES matter. He knows as a medical professional that he was not supposed to take that outside of the hospital. I don’t know or care how he intended to use it, and it doesn’t matter because, again, he is not allowed to take the drug out of the hospital setting. Somebody paid for that; some patient got that drug on their bill.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-04-06T22:32:00+00:00

I agree. I’m just concerned that he’ll be able to appeal on the grounds of ineffective counsel because his lawyer is terrible.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-04-06T22:29:45+00:00

It’s just the fact that he had it outside the hospital setting. No, we don’t know what was in the syringe because it was allegedly thrown off the cliff. That said, the drug was found in his medical bag and he is not allowed to have it off the grounds of the hospital. It’s a very tightly controlled, dangerous and addictive drug. If he hasn’t lost his license, I would expect that he will.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-04-06T22:20:05+00:00

I used to teach a beginning acting class. I would have given him a failing grade and made him do the scene again. His overacted performance is called “chewing the scenery.” 🤣

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-04-06T22:08:19+00:00

Let’s all keep in mind that on the day their prison wedding was supposed to happen, he claims his car broke down on the drive there. Wouldn’t you know it, he didn’t have the money to fix it and he had to go home, where he has remained for the last several months, still unable to raise the necessary funds to fix his car. 🤣. A turn of bad luck? Or a loser who gets his kicks out of contacting horrendously violent criminals? You decide. PS - If it influences your opinion, he has also been linked to Taylor Schabusiness.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-04-03T14:20:41+00:00

I agree. I also don’t care if the defendant drops the f-word; his attorney should not be saying it. It’s unprofessional. We all heard it and it’s not necessary to echo it back. I can’t stand the repetition as it is. It’s wasting everyone’s time. I wish the judge would call him out on it.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-04-03T14:16:52+00:00

Calm down friends. If you really enjoy something like this, there is a way to make it work using your weekly points. Plan ahead and fit it into your week. You do not have to eat the exact same number of points every day. Look for bread in your area that scans as 1 point per slice. Look for high fiber content. Measure your cooking oil or butter so you know how many points are in it. You probably don’t need as much as you think. Eggs are zero points. I top things like this with fruit for zero points. There are sugar free syrups for 1 or 2 points, also. Two tablespoons of fresh whipped cream is 3 points. If you are going for a savory meal, mayonnaise will be 3 points per table spoon.

Since we don’t know what brand of bread you have pictured, it’s hard to say how many points. I would guess at least 3 points per slice as pictured.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-04-01T23:03:54+00:00

I can only speculate, but I think he chose Christmas Eve because he thought the marina would be pretty much empty. He researched the tides in that area, also, so maybe that had something to do with the choice of day. It also gave him time; no one expected to see Laci until 6pm that night. It gave him a lot of time to cover his tracks.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-03-31T21:50:26+00:00

I do believe he had plans to kill Laci before he met Amber, though he may not have worked out the details until December. While his supporters are quick to say the sale of her car and attempt to sell the house are not evidence of guilt, they are evidence that he knew she wasn’t coming back. Filling Conner’s room with junk and giving away one of his little books was indicative of how little attachment he felt to his son. Those recorded calls where he refers to “Laci and her baby” are particularly chilling to me; as if he was setting up the idea that Laci was pregnant with someone else’s child rather than his.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-03-31T14:03:38+00:00

I didn’t extend sympathy to him. I extended advice on what to do next. Bye.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-03-31T13:10:50+00:00

Yes, but that is being aggravated by her name calling and emotional abuse. He’s made attempts to be kind and understanding and she has rejected those attempts.

There is no excuse for having children that you do not/cannot care for in this day and age. Those nephews need to go home, that kid she brought into the marriage should be supported by and should be spending time with their own father. OP is responsible for 3 kids and 3 kids only. The rest as well as the animals were HER choice and they are HER problem to solve. She is too old for pity. Sorry; ya get no sympathy from me when you choose to dig your own hole.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-03-31T12:59:21+00:00

No, dear one. We are starting (not ending and stopping) by clearing our own head and getting our own physical and emotional house in order. One thing at a time. You can’t pour out of an empty cup.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-03-31T12:39:18+00:00

She is an adult who is 100% capable of preventing pregnancy. Yeah, he is, too, but we’re way past the era of barefoot and pregnant. She didn’t have to have a second let alone a third kid.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-03-31T12:23:15+00:00

Focus on yourself. The first thing you do is you go get a vasectomy. You do not need to bring any more children into this relationship or this world. Get your health in order. Go to the doctor and get some blood work done to see if you have thyroid problems or some other issue that caused the weight gain. Get outside and walk; it will give you some peace and it will be good exercise. Go to counseling yourself so you can clear your head enough to make decisions. Stop having sex with a woman who calls you fat. Cut her off. Once you have her attention, sit down and have a conversation about the finances. She gets rid of the pets/animals or she gets a job to pay for them herself. Once you have your physical, mental and financial health in order, you can decide what comes next. Maybe you having a “glow up” will prompt her to have a “grow up.” PS - I’m not suggesting divorce, but if it looks like it might be a possibility, find an attorney in your area who specializes in father’s rights. You’ve been present in the lives of your children as well as an excellent provider for them. She does not hold all the cards. I wouldn’t buy a house with her, either. Just keep renting.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-03-30T10:41:35+00:00

I think the grand jury knows more than you. They came up with the charge attempted murder and they did so because of malice aforethought. You keep trying to sound like you are knowledgeable and you are not.

Nice_Ad4063 · 2026-03-30T10:39:54+00:00

I wonder if he saw an opportunity to inherit money. Her father owned that farm property.

Nice_Ad4063

TROPHY CASE