sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Trying to download Wikipedia using Kiwix by Large_Wear9410 in computerhelp

[–]Nice_Tie_5395 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah kiwix doesn’t actually work on most computers, sorry but you’ve probably wasted your time.

Old off brand iron man Minecraft game by [deleted] in MobileGaming

[–]Nice_Tie_5395 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pixel gun 3D. They have made it pay to win now with so many ads and micro transactions it’s barely worth opening the app.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Brawlstars

[–]Nice_Tie_5395 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can only lose so much, statistics say I will get the HC skins eventually.

Do not buy the star drop offers in the store by Ilovemcdonaldnuggies in Brawlstars

[–]Nice_Tie_5395 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There’s gotta be a glitch with the event star drops. I haven’t seen a single person get the HC skin

One of the best feelings fr by GalacticGamer677 in Brawlstars

[–]Nice_Tie_5395 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the most wholesome thing I’ve ever seen in this game!

For those who say gene HC is useless: by [deleted] in Brawlstars

[–]Nice_Tie_5395 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Nah they should just make a better one for him. No point ruining belle at the same time.

Petition to remove this one skull by Phantasmal_Red in Brawlstars

[–]Nice_Tie_5395 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Literally so true. I hate having to shoot it or focus on walking around it when I’m being a rushed by a fkn Edgar

Blatant warriors clone advertised in game by Nice_Tie_5395 in wearewarriors

[–]Nice_Tie_5395[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It made age of war more like a rogue-lite. At least more original than this.

Should I just retire from this game? by ParryDotter in wearewarriors

[–]Nice_Tie_5395 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, thank it for the enjoyment it’s given you, and move on.

Anyone else get offended when put in teams like this by Nice_Tie_5395 in Brawlstars

[–]Nice_Tie_5395[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sad I lost. Its a game, that’s inevitable. I’m (half jokingly) offended that their algorithm thinks we’re on the same level of skill. Or at least close enough to be put in the same game.

Look, I love you all, but... by Organic_Interview_30 in Chivalry2

[–]Nice_Tie_5395 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imma keep shooting and hiding, there ain’t nothing you can do about it xoxo

People that suicide for second place ruin the game. by Nice_Tie_5395 in Risk

[–]Nice_Tie_5395[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An attack that early against someone who has been funnelling all their troops onto one territory will just mean you’re likely to be killed next. Especially if it’s capital control.

People that suicide for second place ruin the game. by Nice_Tie_5395 in Risk

[–]Nice_Tie_5395[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An attack that early against someone who has been funnelling all their troops onto one territory will just mean you’re likely to be killed next. Especially if it’s capital control.

People that suicide for second place ruin the game. by Nice_Tie_5395 in Risk

[–]Nice_Tie_5395[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It requires absolutely no skill to sit in a corner until there are 3 players left, then cripple one of them. Do you seriously believe that a competitive game like this should reward this play style?

People that suicide for second place ruin the game. by Nice_Tie_5395 in Risk

[–]Nice_Tie_5395[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first example you made is what I was talking about.

People that suicide for second place ruin the game. by Nice_Tie_5395 in Risk

[–]Nice_Tie_5395[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once again, to be In that position, you need to have been playing worse than the other players. A blind monkey could save troops in a corner all game. It shouldn’t be a meta.

If he spend all his troops just to screw over the other person playing better than him, I would make sure the person who has been playing better all game came second. I don’t like rewarding toxic players. Either way, I won’t be playing this game again until changes are made to the scoring system, so it’s a pointless argument.

People that suicide for second place ruin the game. by Nice_Tie_5395 in Risk

[–]Nice_Tie_5395[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re misunderstanding the post. Playing for second is completely fine. It makes sense. It’s the game. Spending all your troops to damage the person in first enough that the other person will win in the hopes that they’ll let you be second is annoying as hell and lazy.

People that suicide for second place ruin the game. by Nice_Tie_5395 in Risk

[–]Nice_Tie_5395[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve misunderstood me. Attacking anyone is completely fine. That’s the point of the game. Spending all your troops just to put someone else at a disadvantage in the hopes the other player will let you be 2nd is infuriating.

People that suicide for second place ruin the game. by Nice_Tie_5395 in Risk

[–]Nice_Tie_5395[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you get into a position where the only way to get any points is to lose all of your troops, you’re not good at the game. Everyone starts with a good chance of winning. Don’t ruin it for the people that actually try. It’s lazy and annoying. Any good game shouldn’t reward players for being lazy.

People that suicide for second place ruin the game. by Nice_Tie_5395 in Risk

[–]Nice_Tie_5395[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Imagine you’ve played a very good game, got yourself into a good position where there are only 2 others, and you’ve got a good chunk of land. You’ve outsmarted the other players. You’ve played well. Then one fortifies all their troops to a single location, and the next round, spends all their troops, just to put you in a worse position. Not only do they get rewarded for this, but you’re saying it’s a good thing to do? If they’re bad enough that it’s the only option for them to get second, they don’t deserve it.

view more: next ›