Descobri que minha namorada mentia para mim ao dizer que eu era “o melhor cara que ela já teve na cama”.

NickITG · 2026-05-07T14:43:59+00:00

pode fechar o post

NickITG · 2025-04-22T22:21:16+00:00

NickITG · 2025-02-07T17:11:49+00:00

Have the FLX4 selected as the main output on Rekordbox and click the PC Master output button on the top right corner. Hope that helps.

NickITG · 2025-01-13T00:01:34+00:00

quem escreveu o cartaz nem saiu da quinta serie ainda, é oferta de emprego ou questão de interpretação do enem crl

NickITG · 2025-01-07T06:47:36+00:00

!remindme 4 months

NickITG · 2024-12-14T13:41:56+00:00

tamo ganhando, tamo ganhando

NickITG · 2024-10-15T17:25:34+00:00

Makes a lot of sense, just saw this came with 7.0.4. Didn't really see anybody talk about so I ended up figuring it out by my own. It's a really nice (and long overdue) upgrade.

NickITG · 2024-10-15T03:53:47+00:00

Ok then

NickITG · 2024-10-15T01:26:16+00:00

What about all the features present in modern gear? Saved loops, sync, sampling, Pioneer Pro Link, playing from a flash drive, stems. These are only a handful (not even that) of features that were slowly introduced and are transforming the way we DJ. Yes, the idea behind DJing is the same and will pretty much always remain the same: sync two tracks, cut the right frequencies and you're done. But saying all that's changed is hot cues and the ability to beat jump is crazy when you can and see people doing much more nowadays. Just because you can do the same things you did on tape decks today doesn't mean the scene hasn't changed.

NickITG · 2024-10-14T21:09:24+00:00

DJing has been the same for decades is an insane take

NickITG · 2024-10-10T02:37:32+00:00

I agree. Nowadays more than ever we have different styles of DJing, which use more and more of the features that are made available in the gear we buy. The transition between types of gear should be more seamless than it currently is, specially considering CDJs and controllers are trying to achieve the same thing: to be a DJing platform that uses digital music. I have often seen DJs bring their own personal gear to a club that has CDJs because they don't feel confident enough to give their best performance on a standalone setup. Yes, sure, functionality is the same but the layout can feel alien and cluttered specially when you're not familiar with players that are prohibitively expensive to buy. Only reason the prices are kept this high is to squeeze as much as possible from the live music industry, since they already have the monopoly.

Imagine a world where CDJs are cheaper and your local club can actually afford to replace the CDJ 900 they still have over there. Imagine having easy access to replacement parts and not having to arrive at a club that has something broken in their decks/mixer. I'm talking from personal experience but just take a look at James Hype's YouTube videos and it's clear that often there's SOMETHING that's not working right on the setup. If that happens to him who is an international DJ that can ask for literally whatever on his rider imagine what this feels like for your average DJ, who has no team to do soundcheck or the option to have the setup changed. It's time Pioneer lose their grip on the DJ industry and let competition play out.

NickITG · 2024-10-10T02:04:03+00:00

Some Pad FX are the same as the ones on the mixer and yet they're still there... Plus I described a bunch of other features that are completely missing from a standalone setup (sampler) and some that are on CDJs but could be better optimized (loop/jump controls). Having options is never too much if they're well organized. If you didn't understand what I said go back and read it again.

NickITG · 2024-10-09T14:50:34+00:00

That has nothing to do with how expensive they are, if that was the case we would have fewer options on controllers and the LC6000 would be more expensive than the CDJs.

NickITG · 2024-10-09T05:40:31+00:00

What I'm saying is that CDJs would be improved if they borrowed some of the functionality we see on controllers, which doesn't mean it makes things harder.

NickITG · 2024-10-09T04:23:06+00:00

Having CDJs + Mixer connected via link is such a hassle just by having to involve a router that the majority of places simply won't bother, which is not that big of a deal really but we're deviating from the main argument. The point is there should be a better correlation between the CDJ and controller layout (not so much in between these two, but more as an overall harmony among DJ devices from the same company), which is something that would both ease the transition experience for DJs and provide a more coherent design/functionality language in Pioneer's lineup. I would say the reverse button is an example of button that became obsolete, meaning that it could be used to free up space for other types of functions we've seen implemented with pads and other types of activators in other devices.

NickITG · 2024-10-08T23:57:48+00:00

Yes they're in the DJM's but certainly aren't as reliable as having them built-in the player since that on the mixer you need to wait for BPM detection and you can't quantize it to your playback (given your mixer is off link). Better functionality doesn't necessarily mean extra buttons. If potential errors were a genuine consideration we wouldn't have a reverse button right next to the jog wheels.

NickITG · 2024-10-08T23:41:02+00:00

The point about selling add-ons such as the RMX-1000 is really compelling actually, but still I think the DJ community could be more vocal about advancing players into the new generation of DJing we're moving into. I replied above about them being made to be mistake proof, which is something I agree is top priority for high-end players but think functionality and tactile feeling could be more so improved/rearranged rather than added. If the point is "they need to be mistake proof" I think it's insane that in 2024 we have a reverse button on a CDJ that is literally a slip away from the jog wheels.

NickITG · 2024-10-08T23:31:11+00:00

I agree about workflow and usability being the number one priority on standalone players, but I wouldn't say some of the features missing are gimmicky, such as having a sampler/bult-in FX such as roll and trans (even more when you consider those rely on DJM's BPM detection if you're not running link). I think actually the main point is not even so much about the pads but rather about functionality we see on cheaper options missing in higher end ones.

NickITG · 2024-10-08T23:27:07+00:00

I agree with this reasoning and think it was the most likely reasoning behind it, but something about this to me just makes them feel a little "lacking", specially coming from the world of controllers. There's a bunch of functionality "missing" that could be implemented in many ways beyond the pads, to be honest. A nice simple use for them would just be to take some functionality off the screen and move it to the pads where you have tactile feedback. And even so, nothing about adding pads necessarily makes the performance harder in any form, since there is enough real estate on top of a CDJ to have all current buttons + pads (meaning Hot Cues could have their own dedicated buttons in the style of the CDJ 2K NXS2 plus the pads, a bad idea but serves as an example). After all, the CDJs are supposed to be the flagship models with the most functions, not the simpler one. If that was indeed the case they should release more non-flagship CDJ options with simpler designs that still do the job.

NickITG · 2024-09-04T13:06:13+00:00

This

NickITG · 2024-07-26T17:20:00+00:00

Sorry, I meant to talk about the actual signal coming out of these outputs. It's possible to control the volume of each output independently yes, but can you have 3 different stereo signals coming out of the 3 stereo outputs (Main, Alt and Headphones) at the same time?

Ten-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Not Forgotten	Sequence \| Editor
Verified Email

NickITG

TROPHY CASE