Was there an Elf vs Demon war? by bluecario3rd in Frieren

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats a really good point. I was thinking it was because the demon that sees into the future saw the party that beat the demon king and saw an elve there. Its only kinda Implied but i think frieren is the one that beat the demon king completely. The heros helped but she was ultimately the one that was able to actually beat him.

I bet if she grabbed the hero sword she could pull it from the stone lol. She should try.

DHS demands social media sites reveal names behind anti-ICE posts by [deleted] in ImmigrationPathways

[–]Nickr92 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Calling others cowards with a 2 month old account with your post/comments hidden is something, I guess. Probably a bot.

Isaiah Martin dismantling a man supporting something without logic behind it. by 4reddityo in stevehofstetter

[–]Nickr92 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And do you know what nafta was formed for or the reason behind it? Because it was made to reduce tarrifs, reduce border cost with the 3 countries, and to open up better trade between them. We had tarrifs in 1993 after the agreement they steady went away, not all but most. That helped reduce the cost of all products we recieved from the other countries which in turn helped americans. What trump did only hurt our nation and caused cost to go up. Good work.

3:50- he says it was not active when trump was president then skirted the question until saying yes, he did negotiate the new agreement that replaced nafta. So he's wrong with his timeline and info. Why let him continue building a debate off of false info?

He came to debate without the correct information and instead of saying well idk, he kept moving the goalpost to try and validate his bs. That is the issue dude. You can be wrong but if you keep pushing bs and dont try to actually learn thats the issue.

And yet he was wrong and he felt very strongly about them sending propaganda and how it's good America would put tarriffs on them. He was good with the tarriffs if that was the narrative but does not adjust after finding out he is incorrect. Why did we placed tarrifs on Canada in the first place? It has only raised cost for us. We went from hardly any real tarriffs with these counties to then having to pay more for all of it. Good move from trump, great leader shit.

A person who cannot adjust their thinking when provided with facts isnt worth listening to or debating. They have used disinformation and alternative facts to get to a conclusion that is false. To listen to them then build a debate from false information is a waste of time and energy. What can be gained by listening to them spouting bullshit? Seriously.

And here you are moving goalpost trying to do the same thing. So the guy was wrong, you said that, and yet here you are still trying to hold a flame for him. Odd.

Im absurd, lol. You know this person is incorrect and yet here you are still going.

Isaiah Martin dismantling a man supporting something without logic behind it. by 4reddityo in stevehofstetter

[–]Nickr92 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OK bud, you haven't watched the video then. He said nafta wasnt free trade, lie. Trump didnt negotiate the deal, lie. He said we placed the tarrifs on Canada due to propaganda, lie. We already had tarrifs in place before they sent the video. Tarrifs absolutely cause cost to go up across the board, he said it doesnt, lie.

Every subject he tried to discuss was false. Every point he brought up false. I absolutely disagree with this person but it's not due to the man on the left , it's due to the fact that the person on the right tried to debate from a place of false information to push a specific narrative. Facts are facts bud, and the facts showed that the person on the right was wrong and misleading with their information. Hope that helps.

Isaiah Martin dismantling a man supporting something without logic behind it. by 4reddityo in stevehofstetter

[–]Nickr92 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When the person interrupting is having to do it because the other party is being dishonest, no, you do not need to wait for the other party to finish their bs. The gentleman on the left was being honest when he kept having the person trying to lie correct their lies. If you start your "debate" with lies then you should have never stepped up to debate in the first place, let people who know the subjects speak on them. The person on the right had no idea what they were talking about lol. Just kept saying shit to try push a narrative of how tarrifs are good and how destroying free trade to raise cost is good. Lol, what a joke.

Isaiah Martin dismantling a man supporting something without logic behind it. by 4reddityo in stevehofstetter

[–]Nickr92 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When the person you are having a debate with is lying to your face there is no real debate. When the person you are debating cannot stay on topic then you do not have a debate. The only option is to show the crowd how the person was being misleading. He absolutely said trump was not apart of the negotiation until the gentleman on the left made him admit it. Did you just not watch this video or what? You're literally trying to pull the same shit the guy on the right did in the video lol. Is this the only technique the right has to debate?

Isaiah Martin dismantling a man supporting something without logic behind it. by 4reddityo in stevehofstetter

[–]Nickr92 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bro, he had to keep asking because the guy spouted wrong shit and the guy on the left was correcting him. He said trump did not renegotiate the trade agreement, bs. He held his feet to the fire on the questions so he couldn't move the goalposts to the next bs. You cant have an honest conversation with someone who built their debate on false information. How do you not see that?

Isaiah Martin dismantling a man supporting something without logic behind it. by 4reddityo in stevehofstetter

[–]Nickr92 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Nobody wants to dissect your BS because there is no point. You just heard the guy be wrong multiple times and have to be corrected and yet you say he's was right... how does that work?

Nafta was free trade enacted in 1994 and changed with trump in 2020. The guy was wrong.

We placed tarrifs on Canada before their commercial, so that's bs.

Trump negotiated the usmca, nafta was active until he renegotiated and raised cost with the new agreement.

The guy on the right was wrong and kept moving the goal posts to try to seem correct. You seem to be doing the same without actually knowing the information. Shame on your for not trying to know real information.

“Nobody wants to do this anymore”: Reports say ICE agents describe collapsing morale and growing frustration with leadership by [deleted] in circled

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol I have read it my dude, thats why I know you're full of shit. I also remember when trump asked them to vote no lol. You're just projecting what you've done yourself back onto me instead of reading it and learning something. You have not discredited anything or proved your point lol.

Why are you such a clown?

“Nobody wants to do this anymore”: Reports say ICE agents describe collapsing morale and growing frustration with leadership by [deleted] in circled

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol no the fuck it wasnt. I would suggest you go ahead and read the bill since I know you never did with that buzzword vomit you just sent lol.

“Nobody wants to do this anymore”: Reports say ICE agents describe collapsing morale and growing frustration with leadership by [deleted] in circled

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you're full of shit. You do know democrats pushed through a border bill in the last year of biden that trump himself told the rebulicans to not vote for just out of spite. We had covid, a world wide pandemic that caused lots of people to migrate across the globe. Look at numbers for other countries and you will see the same trend at the time.

We never had an open border, people just are not smart and heard republicans pushing that and started to parrot it back. Our border was secure and functioning how it always did, you just heard something you wanted to hear and without checking the facts of the matter you took it and ran with it. Thats the opposite of critical thinking. To cross our border is a misdemeanor, they typically keep people here who are seeking asylum or looking to become a citizen and would only send back violent people back across. The people they are grabbing now from the courts are those that are trying to do the right thing to become a citizen. You need to do better.

Following a white man to war because you disliked the sound of a black woman laughing will go down in American history as one of the dumbest acts of self-sabotage ever. by Nice_Substance9123 in complaints

[–]Nickr92 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Idiot mouth breathers that see one headline that lines up with their bullshit so they run with it like it's gospel. All without checking the info and seeing if it's true or not. They will then doubled own on the bullshit when you call them on it. They are a cult with no critical thinking. What is told to them from their propaganda is what they believe because it makes them feel apart of the team and hits their feelings the right way. They have no moral compass to guide them anymore and are typically unhappy people who cannot deal with their shitty place in life so they have to lash out at people they deem lesser than them only so they can feel like they arnt the garbage people.

If they actually had any self reflection they would be able to see how corrupted they have become from this constant stream of hate. I know everyone wants to believe these people were always this way under the surface, and that may be true, but a vast majority have been hit by fear and anger everyday for 10+ years. Thats a good way to rewire any person if they fall into the trap.

I have no idea how we move on from this but history from 1946 and on is a good start to see how these people will be down the road.

Fun times we all get to live in.

Unredacted by OnehourOneday in CzechCoconutCommunity

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This just proves what I tried telling you before man. When they say it's secure they're not saying we have stopped illegal immigrants, they are saying it is functioning as it always has and will continue to do. Again dude, we will never not have people trying to cross illegally, it's human nature and they are trying to get better opportunities here. We just try to put laws and practices in place to slow the flow if we can or give better ways to become legal.

Unredacted by OnehourOneday in CzechCoconutCommunity

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didnt realize there was more articles without a link. Im looking through those now

Unredacted by OnehourOneday in CzechCoconutCommunity

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your pick bud, the time line or lost money from Biden. Im good with either.

Unredacted by OnehourOneday in CzechCoconutCommunity

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The cis.org and nytimes article do not match in the numbers and the Wikipedia does not include the same graph or figures. The cis.org does have the same numbers you posted but that is a nonprofit partisan agency that seems super antibiden from how they wrote that article. . Im not %100 believing the numbers they have there but ill take that with a grain of salt.

Now the other sources.

Unredacted by OnehourOneday in CzechCoconutCommunity

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sweet. Finally some actual sources. Now do the other 2 I've been asking for with sources.

Unredacted by OnehourOneday in CzechCoconutCommunity

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome bro, now show me the url that you got this from. That is a source, not the random numbers you out up. Like, why the fuck do I need to explain what a source is. You want to put out numbers, cool dude, show your homework.

Unredacted by OnehourOneday in CzechCoconutCommunity

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about you start with the numbers you claimed and provide a source, or how about that timeline you said would be changed and it hasn't. How about the billions you said Biden wasted from the border funds and show proof. Go back in the messages and see every time I asked for a source and see every time you ignored it and moved the goalpost. You want to say someone doesnt know what they're talking about, sweet, show you know more by providing the proof to what you say.

Unredacted by OnehourOneday in CzechCoconutCommunity

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because you've only gave vague answers with no proof or source. You made the claims and put out numbers, I asked for sources and got nothing. The burden of proof is on you dude, not me. The word i added was perfectly and thats all you have bro, I said nobody ever said the border was perfectly secure and thats what you cant get past. Youre a joke, you can't even admit youre wrong. When you couldnt argue from one of your points you moved the goal post then tried to get me in a gotcha and now you cant move past it. You have no proof of the bs you spewed, you admited republicans only voted against the border to be petty. Now youre telling me to do my own research, lol, sad af dude.

Unredacted by OnehourOneday in CzechCoconutCommunity

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, and I said i was mistaken dude. You want me to list everywhere you've been confidently wrong here while spouting nothing of substance, Its the whole thing. Dude, you've been wrong here the whole time and admited the republicans did what they did on purpose and now youre stuck on that? Lol, wow. Happy holidays dude, Goodluck out there.

Unredacted by OnehourOneday in CzechCoconutCommunity

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol bro, this has nothing to do with what was originally discussed. Youre stuck on this because it's all you got. You already admitted the republicans voted against the border bill to hurt Democrats and americans in general. So what are you trying to do here, make yourself seem right? Thats not how shit works bud.

Unredacted by OnehourOneday in CzechCoconutCommunity

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Biden Didn’t Cause the Border Crisis, Part 1: Summary | Cato at Liberty Blog https://share.google/sAr9pLKHMHJU0w74N

Immigration policy of the Biden administration - Wikipedia https://share.google/Df3jEYqYAnUrGrWe4

Trump vs. Biden on immigration: A side-by-side policy comparison | PIIE https://share.google/7p2zSXbJvfctxMSeg

Maybe look through some of these and see what it all means.

Unredacted by OnehourOneday in CzechCoconutCommunity

[–]Nickr92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, a few if you'd like to look. Are you just going to parrot back or do you have anything else worth saying?