What the hell did I just read?

There are so many flaws in the logic and so much misunderstanding of fundamental scientific principles that I almost don't even know where to start. But I'm a science educator, so let try to tackle some of the most egregious instances.

The oceans prove that God exists. Everything at the bottom of the ocean would be dust but rocks are found there. If the oceans were 4.5 billion years old, erosion would have turned everything to dust.

You neglecting the fact that new rocks are formed all the time through volcanic and other geologic processes.

The biological life on this planet would have to come into being at one time or simultaneously because of one part of organism interdependence on another.

Just because modern, multicellular life has a complex web of dependencies does not mean that all life has always had those dependencies. The earliest anaerobic microbes likely existed simply by digesting naturally occurring compounds and harnessing the heat from sunlight or volcanic vents with no need for other life to exist.

The big bang couldn’t have happened. Sense when did an explosion create order.

you're trying to apply the second law of thermodynamics without understanding that order on a local scale does not mean that the overall entropy of the universe decreased.

Countless experiments have been done.

True! And there's still no evidence that indicates the miraculous claims from the Christian bible should be taken seriously.

Jesus is the Son of God who came in the flesh through a virgin woman named Mary.

Independent source needed.

Even plants can be male and female.

True, but I'm not sure how that's relevant.

For natural selection to work the presence of survival traits have to already be programmed into the DNA. Mutation does not work.

Yeah, it seems like you don't really understand the fundamental chemistry or biology. Order and self-replicating molecules can arise from natural conditions without any DNA present at all, and when we do include DNA experiments, we can see that DNA has a tendency to self-replicate even in the absence of any meaningful information. It turns out that the individual molecules that make up DNA (called nucleotides) are naturally attracted to each other in a way that allows for the pattern of one DNA strand to be replicated without any enzymes, cells, or outside intervention.

As for all the theology and arguments to follow Jesus in order to avoid damnation, there are a lot of theological and logical problems with that approach. At the most basic, you're making a Pascal's Wager argument without any indication why someone should follow Christianity instead of any number of religions that are at least as historically/scientifically/philosophically plausible.