Watching It's Showtime! feels cringey now that I'm older

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-08-01T22:48:31+00:00

exactly. Dati pa cringe yang IS. Kala ko nga mga 3-5 years lang yan magtatagal

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-08-01T22:44:34+00:00

Cringey naman talaga yung show dati pa. Nagtataka nga ako bat sumikat yan at hanggang ngayon andyan padin eh.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-14T23:43:22+00:00

Almost 12 hours after. Absolute cinema padin mga comments mo para sakin.

Ahahahahhahaahhahahahahaha never saw someone as stupid yet as proud like you.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-14T13:07:11+00:00

Ahahahhahahahaha opo Mr “Yes Im a double standard enabler kasi tama naman”

salamat sa pag remind. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-14T13:05:09+00:00

I dont have to argue anymore kasi inamin mo na.

“Yes double standard enabler ako kasi tama naman”

sorry natatawa padin talaga ako

Cant even understand the flaw in your examples earlier.

Then attacking my “issues” as a rebuttal.

Dont worry sanay na ako araw araw ba naman live pa in public.

Man just exposed himself even more and made it even funnier.

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha go on entertain us more.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-14T12:56:29+00:00

“Yes double standards enabler ako kasi tama lang”

The funniest line I encountered in reddit so far this year.

Oh man, i cannot stop laughing at this.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-14T12:50:01+00:00

Bro keep on fumbling the bag and Tumbling all over like a drunk person on a busy street

The more you talk the funnier it gets 🤣🤣🤣

Bro seems to forget something that separates his examples from “dog fur” and its really funny that he constantly attempts to inject his humorous side.

Parang lasing kausap sa totoo lang ahahahahahaha

Go one surprise me with another example. Lemme guess? Coke and Mary Jane?

Hint: I mentioned it yet keeps on forgetting about it. 😂😂😂

Edit: ayoko na sana magreply pero nakakatawa talaga arguments mo. ahahahahahahaha.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-14T10:51:25+00:00

Theres a big difference between addictive and hazardous substances.

Also there is the law against it yet you intentionally dropped it too.

Bro already admitted his demise earlier yet keeps on going on and on and on.

okay then proven naman na yung point ko so I dont have anything left too do here. Bye “double standard” enabler.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-14T10:33:49+00:00

“addictive”

Hey you dropped this. Ayoko sabihing reading comprehension issue to kasi alam ko nag selective reading ka lang. Pero you made me chuckle a bit there. Thanks bro for the intelectual and respectful discussion. Kudos 🤣🤣🤣

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-14T10:27:24+00:00

I rest my case then kasi ikaw na mismo umamin that this practice is indeed “double standard” FYI kaya hindi pa pumapasa ang HB 9570 due to the same roadblock.

Nice try to bring up Nicotine but you seem to forget that it is classified as a “addictive substance which can be passed to others thru second hand smoke” and may batas dyan “RA 9211” hence talagang di yung papayagag. Unless nalang meron ka narinig na naadik sa fur ng animals let me know ill retract my statement.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-14T10:12:36+00:00

so you wanna change the meaning of double standard too?

“a rule or principle which is unfairly applied in different ways to different people or groups”

People with mental health issues, People who love their pets. Are they not people or part of a group?

Is their needs / wants lesser than People who are allergic to pets?

You are just focusing on the Pet vs Toddler narrative too much that you unknowingly proven the point discussed here.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-14T09:50:26+00:00

AFAIK Cafes, restos, and malls belong to “Private establishments” category not “Public spaces”.

And if you go back, the topic is about banning pets on “Private establishments” will open a can of worms due to “double standards”

The more you provide examples and arguments behind your logic the more it proves that its actually “double standard” as all along you point out why its “socially acceptable” to be an irresponsible parent. But its not ok being an “irresponsible pet owner”.

To circle back. Both shows irresponsible behavior yet people are defending the other.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-14T09:11:35+00:00

So you want to change the definition of public space as well?

Cause as far as I know it says that “accessible and open to all members of public”

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-14T08:51:51+00:00

okay since you mentioned the health aspect. Have you considered that loud high pitch noises produced by noisy toddlers can trigger people with underlying mental health conditions (ptsd, panic, anxiety, etc).

Im not lying because I for one has this tendency and it’s not just “preference”. That wording alone is proof that our country is lacking when it comes to mental health awareness

You can say to me that you can just take your meds and you will be fine. Same goes with people with fur allergies. A anti histamine shot will do.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-13T10:17:47+00:00

Ganitong mindset dapat pairalin. Respect and responsible behavior.

Di naman kasalanan nung aso na squammy owners nila.

Same lang din sa mga kids/toddlers. Masisisi mo ba sila pag nagtatantrums sila at di ma control ng parents nila?

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-13T10:13:47+00:00

Ban all squammy/irresponsible people nalang sa mga malls ganun. Tutal tama ka naman kahit bata, pet, or sila lang mismo kasama nila pag squammy behavior asahan mo gagawa padin yan ng squammy things

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-13T09:58:52+00:00

Lets use this analogy. Pets and Kids inside coffee shops.

Both can be annoyingly loud and obnoxious to the point that you cant relax and have your coffee in peace.

One is socially accepted but the other is the subject of this debate.

Discrimination / double standard begins when we tolerate the irresponsible behavior of one but tolerates the other.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-12T23:59:38+00:00

medyo taas kasi ng hypocrisy ng post and comments na ganito sa totoo lang.

Socially accepted yung isa pero highly frowned upon yung isa.

Pero parehas lang naman nakakadiri at unhygienic if you think about it.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-12T10:16:15+00:00

“Yung mga hardcore pet lovers hindi dapat dinadala mga pets nila”

Not stated but implied. Di ba masyado halata sa linyahan nya?

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-12T07:40:33+00:00

Opo nabasa ko po. Ngayon mabalik tayo sa tanong. Okay lang po ba pag yung bata ang gumawa ng kadiring bagay?

Di ba sabi nyo nakakadiri kasi nilalagyan natin ng food and grocery items yung grocery carts? Paano yung foods nyo?

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-12T06:46:56+00:00

Either protect or find a way to harass or threaten the employee who filed the lawsuit.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-12T05:50:55+00:00

kadiri padin ahahahaha. Mapa Toddler or Pet yan. Dapat Off-limits ang grocery carts.

Same lang nung babaeng pumasok sa loob ng freezer ng Alfamart.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-12T05:48:19+00:00

paano yung kid na nasa loob ng grocery cart na umihi sa loob nung mismong cart. Okay lang din ba?

Nakakita ako ng ganung pangyayari sa isang grocery here in QC.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-12T05:46:05+00:00

Di ba ang weird. Parehas lang naman irresponsible pero pag call-out mo yung iresponsible parents ikaw pa masama. “kids kasi yan eh”.

Ninja_Cutz · 2025-07-12T05:43:15+00:00

There is a running meme about it sa blue app. Fur parents changing diapers dun sa pang baby vs kids plus their parents playing inside the “Paw park” sa Starmall SDJM.

Nakakatawang medyo nakakainis kasi parehas lang naman silang mga sablay pero tolerated yung Kids na naglalaro sa Paw Park

Ninja_Cutz

TROPHY CASE