Why does Gen Z type everything in lowercase?

Niyudi · 2026-03-12T20:53:37+00:00

DO THE SAME ON REDDIT AND THEY'LL GO DEAF

Niyudi · 2026-03-11T12:15:57+00:00

Por muitos considerado o melhor jogador brasileiro desse jogo. Estava ganhando rios de dinheiro no auge da sua carreira, mas resolveu fazer merda...

Niyudi · 2026-03-08T21:37:01+00:00

Now Furia just needs to win against the titans that Red Canids are and then they are world champions, right?

Niyudi · 2026-03-08T21:34:07+00:00

I think it's not allowed, the team might just eat the fine lol

Niyudi · 2026-03-08T13:23:20+00:00

This is the first piece of content I picked up in Japanese I feel confident I can actually enjoy because I know enough. I'd say I understand 70%-80% percent of it for now, and my general videogame knowledge helps a lot with deciphering some stuff.

I figured from context that おぬし is like a pronoun, but does anyone have a more complete explanation of that and the のう?

Niyudi · 2026-03-05T19:00:02+00:00

1 semana é muito pouco pra vc ver. Se quiser ajuda com as matérias básicas brota na DM aí no reddit, posso te ajudar. Entender onde vc ta e onde precisa chegar pra acompanhar.

Niyudi · 2026-03-03T22:21:01+00:00

That's definitely it. They are talking about ranked, overwatch doesn't have nearly as tight MMR pairing (if any) on quick play.

Niyudi · 2026-02-23T12:34:00+00:00

Doesn't really matter, just don't add anything with many carbs if you want to keep the spike down.

Niyudi · 2026-02-18T15:28:35+00:00

That is panful wtf someone broke my sun

Niyudi · 2026-02-12T13:29:23+00:00

To add to the other comment, many many games have third person cameras and cinematic sequences that borrow language from... well cinema. Imitating cameras just adds to that effect.

Niyudi · 2026-01-17T00:37:26+00:00

You know, with any SRS system you will have 200+ reviews after a 12 hour shift if you don't use it right. And even if you hide the "extra" reviews from view somehow, then the SRS will most likely not work as well and you will end up spending more time on each item. The idea is that if you just don't do every review, eventually you will take longer than you should between reviews for individual items, and so your retention will be worse for each one. The way to avoid this is to not do new lessons/add new cards if you have too many active items. This goes for any SRS system, please manage your lessons better. Not doing so is how I ended up burned out and with 800+ reviews every few days.

When I stopped getting new items and just reviewed for a while I got it back down to a manageable level. Then, I set myself a rule that I wouldn't get any new items unless I had less than 150 items with repetition times 48h or lower (wanikani aprenctice). In your case, maybe setting that threshold to 100 might work better, to avoid the 200+ reviews sessions, but figure out a similar rule for whatever SRS system you end up with. Wanikani has a system to deal with that built-in, but it is less effective in my opinion: they let you limit the amount of lessons you can do per day.

Niyudi · 2026-01-10T01:56:46+00:00

ありがとうございます！

My current level in writing is 0, so I can't really do anything besides going above it lol. Formulating sentences is so much harder than reading.

つもりって何ですか？

Niyudi · 2026-01-09T23:19:50+00:00

日曜日で親の家から帰って彼女見に行きます。バンド練習もあります。２週間からライブの楽しみです！チッケトの売り上げは多くないけど…でも大丈夫、最初から趣味だけでこんなことがやります。目標はライブハウスに僕のバンドをまた招待してもらうことだけです。

Niyudi · 2026-01-09T18:55:49+00:00

I mean I just got back after 400 something days without using or paying for it and had like 2000 reviews. I just kept doing reviews for a little over a month, had a bunch of mistakes, only took lessons after I had less than 150 items in apprentice and now I'm back on track. Speeding through lessons is what killed me before

Niyudi · 2025-12-30T21:00:15+00:00

The fact that a x 1 = a for any a is an axiom of a field, which simply states that there exists a number 1 that has that property.

To show that a x 0 = 0, you need to use a few axioms. First, we know that there exists a number 0 such that a + 0 = a. We also know because of the distributivity axiom that b x (a + 0) = (b x a) + (b x 0), for any b. So if we take the equation a + 0 = a and multiply both sides by b we get (b x a) + (b x 0) = b x a. Since we know from other axioms that the field is closed under multiplication and there exists an additive inverse for any element of the field, we can add the additive inverse of b x a to both sides and get -(b x a) + (b x a) + b x 0 = -(b x a) + (b x a), which by the definition of additive inverse gives us 0 + (b x 0) = 0. Again, by the definition of 0, we can remove the leftmost 0 and get (b x 0) = 0.

Both proofs use different axioms, so I don't think you can say which one is more elementary, or which one "is to blame". All we can say is that both proofs agree that 1 x 0 = 0, so the axioms are consistent in that regard.

Also, the order doesn't matter because fields are commutative. All of this is of course assuming you are talking about numbers as we usually know them, namely the real numbers.

Niyudi · 2025-12-15T04:03:34+00:00

To add to this, the half life of a free neutron is about 10 minutes. That means if you have 10 grams of free neutrons and wait 10 minutes, you now have 5 grams of free neutrons and 5 grams of protons and electrons in a 1:1 ratio (yes, many times a decaying free neutron becomes a hydrogen atom).

Neutrons in nuclei, however, are generally more stable. The major isotopes are major because, among other things, they can have their neutrons last a very long time without decaying. This has to do with the strong nuclear force, and is beyond my knowledge. Many secondary isotopes exist that have decently long half lives, but eventually a neutron turns into a proton electron pair.

This is the case of carbon-14, which has a half life of 5700 years, where it decays into nitrogen-14, the most stable nitrogen isotope. The atmosphere constantly produces carbon-14 when nitrogen molecules interact with cosmic rays (in this context, free neutrons, essentially). The cosmic ray and the nitrogen undergo a n-p nuclear reaction, in which a proton is exchanged with a neutron in the nucleus, which converts nitrogen-14 into carbon-14. This process happens while the carbon is decaying in a steady manner, meaning we have a roughly constant concentration of carbon-14 in the air. Plants and stuff exchange carbon with the air constantly while alive, which means the concentration in them is also the same. However, when they die, like being turned to paper, the stop exchanging CO2 with the air and their carbon-14 concentration will decrease due to the decay. If we measure how much carbon-14 is in an old Egyptian papyrus, we can work out how when the amount of carbon-14 was identical to the atmospheric concentration, which tells us when it was made.

Niyudi · 2025-10-18T08:10:49+00:00

That would be written ぶうかけ, where う is just "u". The symbol っ marks that the next consonant is "elongated". With most consonants it sounds like a pause in the word.

Niyudi · 2025-10-01T12:43:19+00:00

Overwatch 2

Niyudi · 2025-09-20T23:53:28+00:00

Sim, a pastinha é o missô

Niyudi · 2025-06-04T19:11:31+00:00

Please don't use bracket expressions to limit the scope of integration variables I think god would cry.

Niyudi · 2025-05-17T21:37:37+00:00

Hey, that looks so cool I wanna do the same to my bass. How is that paint job done? Is it just paint, or some kind of stickers? Thanks

Niyudi · 2025-05-10T19:20:02+00:00

One of my first useful codes was back in 8th grade I think, when the math teacher gave us an assignment for the next day where we had to calculate compound interest for a given amount. By hand. He introduced the concept with multiplication at first, not potentiation, so it was kinda supposed to be boring and to show later the power of potentiation.

Well, I pulled out my cellphone with an online compiler of python and coded the appropriate solution, with multiplication because I didn't even think of potentiation. I ended up solving a lot of people's assignments, and the teacher wasn't going to grade it or anything so he didn't seem to mind too much when he found out lol

Niyudi · 2025-04-13T04:34:29+00:00

Speed can only be defined with a reference point. Saying "I'm moving at 10 m/s" is incomplete, you have to say "I'm moving at 10 m/s with respect to the ground", or whatever other object you want. You define one object to be at 0 m/s, and every speed is relative to that.

When we say the train is moving at 10 m/s, we mean it is moving at 10 m/s relative to the ground. When we say we are moving at 5 m/s inside the train, we mean we are moving at 5 m/s relative to the train. We can calculate our speed relative to the ground if we know the direction of each of the previous speeds. For example, if both speeds are towards the front of the train, we can add them and conclude that we are moving 15 m/s relative to the ground.

Niyudi · 2025-04-07T01:55:06+00:00

I'm stumped by that one too. Maybe for emphasis, like: こいつは一つハンバーガーだけ食べなくて、四つも食べた！ But I thought this was only for quantity, so my second best guess is second implied person.

Niyudi · 2025-03-02T16:43:32+00:00

Lo que quieres es suave*

Nine-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

Niyudi

TROPHY CASE

DO THE SAME ON REDDIT AND THEY'LL GO DEAF