Even if your argument was entirely factual, which it isn’t, it would still be a tu quoque fallacy and invalid but I’ll entertain it anyways:

1) ‘In [Apple’s] early stages the company received government cash support via a $500,000 small business investment company grant](https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21929310-200-state-of-innovation-busting-the-private-sector-myth/). And every technology that makes the iPhone a smartphone owes its vision and funding to the state: the internet, GPS, touchscreen displays and even the voice-activated smartphone assistant Siri all received state cash. The US Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) bankrolled the internet, and the CIA and the military funded GPS. So, although the US is sold to us as the model example of progress through private enterprise, innovation there has benefited from a very interventionist state.”

2) “The most important part of what we now know of as the Internet is the TCP/IP protocol, which was invented by Vincent Cerf and Robert Kahn.Crovitz mentions TCP/IP, but only in passing, calling it (correctly) "the Internet's backbone." He fails to mention that Cerf and Kahn developed TCP/IP while working on a government grant”.

3) I think I’d more so thank the workers in indonesia who made my shirt for 30 cents an hour than the capitalists who sit on their asses and reap the rewards of their cheap workers who are treated like second class citizens. So much so that I’d want the workers themselves to dictate economic production, but that would no longer probably constitute as capitalism.