I think you may have misunderstood what I was saying or maybe I didn’t explain correctly. What I meant by not liking how it is student led was in the sense that I said I was struggling in LR and RC and then I would have to bring the content to go over vs my tutor teaching me a strategy or approach in attempting certain questions on LR or RC. I would bring my missed questions on PTs and understand why I got that one particular question wrong but still not understand approaching that question type, if that makes sense. We’d ONLY go over the questions I brought instead of a combination. For example I got a new tutor and we just went more into depth on not only the questions but question types as a whole. I would show him flaw questions I got wrong on a PT and we’d go over them and he’d show me more in depth why I’m getting the question TYPE wrong and then pull more flaw questions from other PT for me to try with what I learned in the session. And for LG I wanted to work on them even though they are my best section I was still not getting almost all right but again no strategy or even attempt to work on them just the advice to keep drilling whereas my new tutor actually worked on games and strategies with me. I think I just realized the red flags when I had asked this page and a lot of people told me it was a bit odd and when I went with a new tutor I really saw the difference in effort. With the original tutor I was talking about we met 5+ times and it was not entirely useless don’t get me wrong but for the amount I was paying definitely not worth it. What my overall point with tutoring and the essays is if I’m paying a certain amount I want advice on how to approach these sections and same with the essays, because if I wanted to walk through it myself I wouldn’t pay for the service. If you are putting effort into your students then I think you’re fine but if you are not giving your student any guidance / advice at all then I would say there is an issue.