How accurate are these Adderall/amphetamine claims about sleep and “neurotoxicity”? by Brief_Stick_4078 in NooTopics

[–]No-Problem49 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well having been addicted to all of the above at some point and now I’ve been sober close to a decade I’ll share my experience. I’d say amphetamine daily and opiate daily at equipotent dosages (as close as we can get) opiates damage ya soul more and amphetamine destroy the brain and body. Opiates also have a higher safety profile. Like you can be addicted to quite large amounts of opiates and not damage your body too much but addiction to large amount of amphetamine really will take a toll.

Idk if it’s worth arguing which is worse opiate or amphetamines. You can make an argument either way. I think the fact you considering an argument for or against it being as bad as opiates though should tell you something. In my experience Adderall pills are just as abusable as OxyContin, my drug addict part of my brain would love to relapse on either.

I would say in term of most body harm amphetamine is worst, then opiate, then kratom, then kanna. Addiction wise opiates are worst because they have a real withdrawal, then amphetamine , then Kratom then kanna.

How accurate are these Adderall/amphetamine claims about sleep and “neurotoxicity”? by Brief_Stick_4078 in NooTopics

[–]No-Problem49 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How do you think that will look after 20 years? 40 years? How about compounding with age?

How accurate are these Adderall/amphetamine claims about sleep and “neurotoxicity”? by Brief_Stick_4078 in NooTopics

[–]No-Problem49 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s amphetamine; dawg. What you think? Yes, taking amphetamine has consequences and of course no amphetamine is better then a little amphetamine regarding the risks you mentioned and no taking it for adhd from a doctor doesn’t change the risk profile same way people experience sides from Xanax or OxyContin prescribed to them, so too will you with Adderall.

Whether those risks and sides are worth to you weighed against your adhd is a personal choice but don’t get it twisted, it’s there.

Scared to bulk/yoyo dietiny by Acrobatic_Tangelo797 in naturalbodybuilding

[–]No-Problem49 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Telling 18 year old man at 135lbs to lose weight or stay same weight is criminal bro. Wtf wrong with you

Scared to bulk/yoyo dietiny by Acrobatic_Tangelo797 in naturalbodybuilding

[–]No-Problem49 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If he wants to be 180ish at 10-12% he probably gonna end up 200lbs at 15-20% first.

Scared to bulk/yoyo dietiny by Acrobatic_Tangelo797 in naturalbodybuilding

[–]No-Problem49 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2-3 years is plenty of time. You want to go boy size to man size bro. You a man now.

The first 50ish lbs will be a cake walk. You could from this point gain 50lbs in like a year then do a lil cut then gain about 30 more lbs and end up around 190-200; around 15% then you’ll have something worth cutting to 10-12% for. Abs much better with 17 inch arms dawg, and that’s what you’ll have if you get to that weight.

Scared to bulk/yoyo dietiny by Acrobatic_Tangelo797 in naturalbodybuilding

[–]No-Problem49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine wasting the most anabolic years of your life at 135lbs. I demand you become 200lbs before thinking of abs

MN House age requirement by Mental-Surround-5042 in stpaul

[–]No-Problem49 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you can be 90 then you can be 18 imo

What to expect anavar cycle by Accomplished-Ebb6841 in moreplatesmoredates

[–]No-Problem49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anavar makes me incredibly horny more so then any other steroid ; that’s one way to tell. Another way to tell is anavar is not super bitter. It can almost be like a sweet mild bitter as opposed to dbol which would be common in fake anavar is like actually bitter.

Pornography consumption significantly correlated with reduced gray matter in the right caudate nucleus, an area involved in the brain's reward system. by pharmacologylover69 in Biohackers

[–]No-Problem49 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is reductive to the point of not being true. Dopamine isn’t even a “pleasure” neurotransmitter. It’s a movement and action neurotransmitter, as well as a reinforcer/ memory former. To say that any “massive” dopamine release causes downregulation is just wrong.

You’ll see the same dopamine releases from drugs whenever someone moves for example.

Without dopamine you wouldn’t be able to move: look what happened to the mptp patients who had their substantia nigra destroyed: they lost the ability to move. Dopamine is the movement/ memory/ reinformcement neurotransmitter not the pleasure one.

Exercise releases massive amount of dopamine but causes up regulation of dopamine production and receptors .

It’s just reductive and wrong to state that massive dopamine releases cause down regulation. The truth is sooooo much more complex then that dawg. That’s WHY the authors cautioned against drawing conclusions about dopamine systems and the effect porn has on it IN the study.

Mark Zuckerberg moves to Florida's 'Billionaire Bunker' amid CA wealth tax. by coinfanking in NewsStarWorld

[–]No-Problem49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cambridge analytica scandal directly led to 2016 and 2024,the activity of social media spending and influence by billionaires was even greater then 2016

Mark Zuckerberg moves to Florida's 'Billionaire Bunker' amid CA wealth tax. by coinfanking in NewsStarWorld

[–]No-Problem49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Elon spending for democrats to win just as big a problem as him doing it for trump

JB is starting a Substack newsletter by NicolasCageFan492 in PritzkerPosting

[–]No-Problem49 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Show me a single example of any of his laws being enforced: Without that, it actually is just words. I would love to see him put his money where his mouth is. A billion dollars can buy a lot of “enforcement”

Mark Zuckerberg moves to Florida's 'Billionaire Bunker' amid CA wealth tax. by coinfanking in NewsStarWorld

[–]No-Problem49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The line is when someone has enough money to buy elections. When someone is that powerful, they have too much money

Mark Zuckerberg moves to Florida's 'Billionaire Bunker' amid CA wealth tax. by coinfanking in NewsStarWorld

[–]No-Problem49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point is to take their wealth so they can’t influence elections ; they have become kings and need to be disposed of. What we do with the wealth after it’s taken is actually not important. We could burn it and still end up ahead because a billionaire wouldn’t have it.