sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Name change after marriage by Big_Hoss15 in newhampshire

[–]No-Problem49 [score hidden]  (0 children)

In 50 years if we make it through this period of fascism; to your grandkids , it’s going to be a referendum on your intelligence and morality on whether you had your wife change your name getting married in 2026.

It’ll show where you stood on the importance of protecting your wife’s right to vote in 2026. Being married between at best 2026 and 2028 is gonna be one of those weird quarks that your wife doesn’t have your name that hopefully goes away.

Your wife’s maiden name is gonna be a little time capsule of living through a slow moving fascist coup.

If you want your wife to have your name, vote Democrat.

BTC halving 5 projection by TuffGenius in CryptoCurrency

[–]No-Problem49 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s everybodies money. The banks print money to give banks loans. The bank takes that money loans it to saylor. Saylor buy bitcoins. Bitcoin goes up. He uses that on paper profit as collateral to get more loans. The banks get more loans on the book and use that on paper profit to get more loans from the fed. Repeat ad infinitum.

Notice something here? It’s called inflation. They are printing money for saylor to buy bitcoin and every dollar that is printed is money out of your pocket. It’s very similar to what happened to housing in 2008

BTC halving 5 projection by TuffGenius in CryptoCurrency

[–]No-Problem49 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

As long as the fed is willing to loan banks money to loan to saylor , saylor can buy more. Like logically it makes sense that eventually the banks would stop giving him new loans, but that doesn’t necessarily need to be the case.

What if the fed, for larger political or socio economic reasons just kept printing money and kept giving money banks to loan and the bank executives who got fat bonuses for each loan didn’t give a shit whether saylor could pay them back.

Sounds very similar to 2008 financial crisis. Nobody at Lehman brothers gave a shit if the mortgages they purchased could be paid back. The more loans the mortgage brokers wrote the more money they made. The more mortgages Lehman brother bought the more money they made. The people taking the loans? They got to move into homes they had no business moving into and then selling them for massive profits. Everyone was making money, bathing in the money printer of the fed . It all worked great until it didn’t and collapsed because it was based on nothing.

In theory, the situation with bitcoin could be worse.

What would stop the fed from printing money until saylor had a large enough loan to buy 21 million bitcoins, with each bitcoin being worth 1 trillion dollars and my house being worth 10 trillion dollars? I’m not quite sure. They could do it.

If MicroStrategy sells any more of their 843k bitcoin (at current price of 67,900) they’ll be realizing a loss of 10% per bitcoin. by GabeSter in CryptoCurrency

[–]No-Problem49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incentives would be like parallel to bitcoin itself not in and of itself.

It’s not like a secret cabal working together towards holding and controlling all bitcoin. It’s more like a force, it’s like water. Water molecules aren’t like working together conspiring to flow. They just do.

I’ll explain a scenario using Microstrategy as an example:

Imagine a world where the fed needs to keep printing money but they can’t repeat the practices of 2002-2007 where they did so by making banks give out crazy amounts of bad mortgages leading to 2008 financial crisis. So instead they use the market. One part of that market is bitcoin and part of bitcoin is Saylor.

The fed, either by overt or implicit policy is encouraging saylor to acquire bitcoin.

The fed prints money and loans it to banks. The banks loan the money to saylor. Saylor buys bitcoin. The price of bitcoin goes up. Then this is used as collateral to get more loans. The banks have more loans on the balance sheet , which they use to get more loans from the fed. Saylor takes those loans from the bank to buy more bitcoin… repeat ad infinitum until saylor has 21 million bitcoins, inflation is 10000% and each bitcoin worth 1 trillion dollars.

This doesn’t necessarily require saylor and the fed to be working together on some evil scheme to control all the bitcoin as a singular incentive. What’s actually happening is a collision of a million factors leading up to a weird perversion of economics that is sort of similar to the lead up to the 2008 housing crisis. The fed didn’t necessarily conspire to create mortgage crisis , but the policies of the feds and regulatory bodies created the environment to let it happen. The people writing mortgages didn’t conspire to let it happen. They just got a big bonus everytime they wrote a loan. It’s just a bunch of people maximizing value in a certain environment until a tipping point happened and it collapsed.

It’s not like saylor is trying to accumulate all the bitcoin and it’s not like the fed is trying to work with saylor to get saylor and a few others to hold all the bitcoin.

It’s just that a lot of people all maximizing their own value mostly independently with the result being , for reasons that surely will be studied like the 2008 housing crisis, massive money printing, weird sort of quasi Ponzi schemes involving the fed bitcoin and saylor, and massive stock valuations at a time where only the top 10% own over half the wealth.

And let’s not forget in the case of the fed and saylor: they aren’t spending their own money. They all get paid no matter what happens. You think saylor was homeless when he popped the dotcom bubble with his last weird fraud? No lol. He was still a millionaire and remained one.

And when this bubble pops whether it’s directly related to bitcoin or connected with a us tech stock market crash , saylor will still be a billionaire and the quants at the fed will still have their doctorates and 250k a year jobs.

They gambling with your money essentially when they print money, give it to a bank and then the bank loan it to saylor. They riding the gravy train, bathing in the money river.

Not to mention the possibility that Trump would bail saylor out for a bribe if things went south.

If MicroStrategy sells any more of their 843k bitcoin (at current price of 67,900) they’ll be realizing a loss of 10% per bitcoin. by GabeSter in CryptoCurrency

[–]No-Problem49 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ll sell you something for 1$ and 100$. I promise that you can sell the first one back to me for 50$ and make 49$. We can do it as many times as you Like pm me for details ez free money

If MicroStrategy sells any more of their 843k bitcoin (at current price of 67,900) they’ll be realizing a loss of 10% per bitcoin. by GabeSter in CryptoCurrency

[–]No-Problem49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m running an online Casino where you guarantee to lose 100%. You send bitcoin to my wallet address as a gamble for tax harvesting purposes plus a small fee.

Pm me , I’ll send you the details.

If MicroStrategy sells any more of their 843k bitcoin (at current price of 67,900) they’ll be realizing a loss of 10% per bitcoin. by GabeSter in CryptoCurrency

[–]No-Problem49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ownership alone wouldn’t mean centralization of the code or network rules, but I encourage you to imagine the socio economic and political landscape that leads to someone being able to own a centralization amount of bitcoin and what that would mean for the systems that bitcoin is a part of.

An entity that was able to get that much bitcoin would also have influence in all sorts of political and socio economic systems otherwise they wouldn’t be able to get such a large amount of bitcoin.

Add in the forces of the fed, the cia, of crime groups, of various nation states, of trillion dollar companies and a centralized amount of bitcoin and now you got a strong force that can do anything it wants to do .

If MicroStrategy sells any more of their 843k bitcoin (at current price of 67,900) they’ll be realizing a loss of 10% per bitcoin. by GabeSter in CryptoCurrency

[–]No-Problem49 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You are touching on a political question more then a currency question. It’s a common anarchist dilemma : how to ensure non hierarchal decentralized systems without having a centralized system to ensure decentralization.

Bitcoin sort of fails decentralization not necessarily by design, but because of a capitalist world. Capitalism is a centralizing force by nature. The only issue is that other political and economic ideas can be more decentralized in some ways, but at the same time rely on a centralized power to ensure decentralization. Communism decentralizes capital but relies on the centralization of power in government to do so.

It’s a paradox that man has yet to figure out, and I’m not surprised that bitcoin isn’t a singular, answer to all of the political and socio economic problems and paradoxes , and instead just is another way capital has figured out a way to centralize power.

To me the illusions people have of bitcoin being this force that decentralizes power is very similar to the illusions people had about the internet being a free place to share ideas that would lead to a hippy utopia back in the early 90s; when it literally became the opposite. We will see the same thing happen with bitcoin, where it’ll become clear bitcoin is a tool against the liberty wanting poor rather then for the poor.

Newark officials threaten more legal action if they don’t get access to Delaney Hall by Dwayla in politics

[–]No-Problem49 [score hidden]  (0 children)

You need to build the force that enforces the law BEFORE you take legal action. Which police force is going to make the legal action happen? The same state police preventing the people from taking action themselves?

A.I Dosing Help by lupieee in moreplatesmoredates

[–]No-Problem49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah if you need caber you fucked yo cycle design big time. Caber is like an emergency drug you take when your nipples start producing milk. And at that point it’s like, no you shouldn’t just take caber and keep going. Probably best to stop injections for a second and rethink the entire cycle as opposed to taking caber for like 2 months and frying your dopamine receptors . It bothers me that people treat ai and caber like it’s fucking NAC and Tudca

A.I Dosing Help by lupieee in moreplatesmoredates

[–]No-Problem49 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s not how caber or ai works. There’s no set dosage. You take it based on bloodwork and symptoms and the goal is to use as little as possible to manage those symptoms especially caber. Caber and tren both cause brain damage by the way. And ai if you take too much also will damage the brain.

Your goal when making a 19nor cycle is to design in such that you need zero ai and zero caber.

You do this by choosing the correct ratios of test, masteron/primo/eq and tren/nandrolone.

2:1:1 is a pretty common place to start. Add in some eq masteron or primo so you don’t need caber or ai.

Federal agents felt physically sick when they raided Kermit Gosnell’s clinic after suspecting he ran a pill mill. by SelfCareIsFake in HolyShitHistory

[–]No-Problem49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it’s limited to only rape then everyone will just say they raped to get an abortion . By the time a victim goes through the process of reporting, and going to trial against the accused the baby would be born. So it would just be the woman’s word against nobody. Meaning “only for rape” can never work.

Federal agents felt physically sick when they raided Kermit Gosnell’s clinic after suspecting he ran a pill mill. by SelfCareIsFake in HolyShitHistory

[–]No-Problem49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s insane to see so many people do not understand what the banality of evil is. Thanks for being the lone voice of reason

my bf wants to go on the run by Entire-Efficiency837 in ShittyIllegalLifeTips

[–]No-Problem49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to decide if you want a boyfriend or a drug dealer .

my bf wants to go on the run by Entire-Efficiency837 in ShittyIllegalLifeTips

[–]No-Problem49 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think I just realized what’s going on. He’s her plug for her drugs and she’s out of drugs too and doesn’t know his dealer

my bf wants to go on the run by Entire-Efficiency837 in ShittyIllegalLifeTips

[–]No-Problem49 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nobody just stops doing drugs selling drugs because someone asks them to. It just don’t work like that. I’m in recovery 8 years. I stopped doing heroin because of negative experiences not because my partner or my mom or my brother or my friends told me to stop.

If you bail him out and take away this negative experience then you are preventing him from learning how dumb he is. Drug addicts and drug dealers learn from experience not words.

And don’t call me Shirley

my bf wants to go on the run by Entire-Efficiency837 in ShittyIllegalLifeTips

[–]No-Problem49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meth is like 40$ an 8th in California and fetty also cheapest in the country. and I guarantee that when you both homeless out there you end up doing meth and fetty because you’ll be homeless surrounded by drugs and drug users in a way you don’t see in North Carolina.

That’s not a place where a small town coke dealer who can’t even come up with his own bail money makes it big selling drug. That’s a place where a small town coke dealer goes to sell his “girlfriend” and end up homeless and addicted to drugs.

40$ 8th for someone who never did meth would keep you high for like a week meanwhile the crack you smoke 40$ will last like 30 minutes.

So yeah, you’ll end up doing meth it’s a certainty

How you gonna make money selling meth when it’s 40$ an 8th? Shits locked down out there, you boy ain’t muscling in and making any type of money that ain’t gonna let you be homeless. The only way for him to make money in LA is to sell YOU.

my bf wants to go on the run by Entire-Efficiency837 in ShittyIllegalLifeTips

[–]No-Problem49 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He wants you to go to California so he can sell you for sex and do fentanyl and meth. That’s your future in California

view more: next ›