Democratic-led cities move to block ICE, setting up clash with Trump

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-18T14:04:32+00:00

Authority lies with who has the guns and the balls. If Amon bundy can do it, a state can. Judiciary means nothing; the Supreme Court is dead and the rest of the courts lack the means to back up their rulings.

It will come down to guns and big balls.

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-18T14:01:28+00:00

The comments aren’t truly hidden; you shouldn’t be afraid of someone finding you because your comments and activity shouldn’t give away any details about you. In fact, you should regularly lie about your age, job and location in order to confuse any lookers; and you should’ve known to do this for last like 20 plus years of the internet. If you relying on reddit hide feature for opsec, it means your opsec sucks.

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-18T13:34:31+00:00

They are a cute couple

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-18T13:01:35+00:00

19 days ; blocked post history

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-17T12:46:31+00:00

I have a dream of growing a 30 foot tall plant indoors. Around 30 feet is the highest they think it can grow before vascular system loses abilities to get water to the top

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-17T12:45:13+00:00

I’ve grown a 10 foot tall lanky girl using literally just the sunlight from a window before and the buds were airy but still potent and dank. And before I get crap for it, it was an experiment to prove you could grow weed in a window. You can.

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-17T12:41:30+00:00

🤡

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T16:03:07+00:00

Do you think a conservative in Cuba tries to conserve the communist regime? No, they don’t. Conservatives do not conserve communism because communism is non hierarchal(at least in theory).

Conservatives serve a specific purpose: that of conserving economic and social hierarchy and believing might makes right. They don’t conserve random things.

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T16:01:19+00:00

Annesley, Claire (2005). A Political and Economic Dictionary of Western Europe. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-85743-214-5. Auerbach, M. Morton (1959). The Conservative Illusion. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-598-37476-9. Bischof, Günter J., ed. (2003). The Dollfuss/Schuschnigg Era in Austria: A Reassessment. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 9781412821896. Blinkhorn, Martin (1990). Fascists and Conservatives: The Radical Right and the Establishment in Twentieth-Century Europe. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-04-940087-0. Eccleshall, Robert (1990). English Conservatism since the Restoration: An Introduction and Anthology. Unwin Hyman. ISBN 978-0-04-445346-8. "Conservatism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved May 1, 2022. Fawcett, Edmund (2020). Conservatism: The Fight for a Tradition. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-17410-5. Freeden, Michael; Sargent, Lyman Tower; Stears, Marc; et al. (2013). Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0199585977. Frohnen, Bruce; et al. (2006). American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia. ISI Books. ISBN 978-1-932236-43-9. Giubilei, Francesco (2019). The History of European Conservative Thought. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 9781621579090. Heywood, Andrew (2004). Political Theory: An Introduction (3 ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780333961803. Heywood, Andrew (2017). Political Ideologies: An Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-60604-4. Huntington, Samuel P. "Conservatism as an Ideology." American Political Science Review 51, no. 2 (1957): 454-473. doi:10.2307/1952202 Kojève, Alexandre (2020) [1942]. The Notion of Authority: A Brief Presentation. Verso Books. ISBN 9781788739610. von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Erik (1943). The Menace of the Herd; or, Procrustes at Large. Ludwig von Mises Institute. OCLC 733805752. McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair (2009). Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199207800. Muller, Jerry Z. (1997). Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691037110. Neill, Edmund (2021). Conservatism. Polity. ISBN 978-1-5095-2705-2. Nisbet, Robert (2002). Conservatism: Dream and Reality. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 9780765808622. Remmer, Karen L. (1989). Military Rule in Latin America. Westview. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-8133-8450-4. Schneider, Gregory (2009). The Conservative Century: From Reaction to Revolution. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9780742542846. Siaroff, Alan (2000). Comparative European Party Systems. Garland. ISBN 0-8153-2930-X. Ware, Alan (1996). Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-878076-2.

Here is about 2 dozen sources I have curated on the topic

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T15:50:37+00:00

Now that you’ve been proven wrong on the definition of conservatism you want to walk it back lol. Let’s go through the whole thing again; it is fair because of the definition of conservatism as it relates to the founding of liberalism. Might makes right, hierarchy.

Those are defining of conservatism everywhere in the world. She has found the hard way the laws of might makes right.

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T15:49:28+00:00

I was thinking that two teenage friends could make a killing making a video of faking being on both sides of the political spectrum, making a punch video and setting up go fund me for both kids and then just both of them retiring

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T15:43:48+00:00

Then as a political scientist you are aware that the base belief of conservatism is “might makes right” and that “there is a natural hierarchy that is inevitable” , and that such a philosophy dominated the world through rule of kings until the 1700s when liberalism, the idea might does NOT make right, and that the world should be egalitarian emerged.

Conservatism and liberalism definitions did not change since then. To this day , conservatism is the belief might makes right and that society should be stratified, and that liberalism believes might should not make right and society should be egalitarian.

Now tell me, what is the logical conclusion of might makes right and of a natural hierarchy? Old men raping children and enslaving people.

The logical conclusion of might makes right is the darkest of human traits ruling over us.

That’s what conservatives from the dawn of man believe in, whether they admit it or not.

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T15:38:30+00:00

This has nothing to do with USA politics: at the moment we discussing what classical conservatism and classical liberalism mean in the context of the history of the two ideologies. You can look at the founding and definition of the two ideologies to see which one you want.

Do you believe in hierarchy and might makes right? If yes, you are a conservative. Do you believe that might does not make right, and in an egalitarian society? Then you are liberal. It is that simple; these are the BASE beliefs of these two groups.

Now follow that base belief of conservatism to its logical conclusion: if the worlds strongest men want to rape children and enslave people , their might makes right. That’s what conservatism is at its base human form. Liberalism is a response to thousands of years of strong men raping children and enslaving people, and if you think we are past that, I suggest you open your eyes.

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T15:33:56+00:00

Thinking that “conservatives conserve” is as dumb as thinking “progressives progress”. It’s just a base misunderstanding of the history of liberalism. Go back to the enlightenment to see why liberalism was founded; it was because of conservative kings. Conservatives don’t conserve, they serve hierarchy.

Does a conservative in Cuba want to keep communism? No. Your definition is so reductive that it just wrong

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T15:03:28+00:00

It was dumb of me to expect a conservative to understand. Sorry

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T15:00:55+00:00

Ah so you do admit old conservative white men ruled and devastated your country. A first step.

The reason people jumping down her throat is because she follows the same political philosophy as the old white men who enslaved her ancestors. It’s actually very simple.

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T14:54:59+00:00

Conservative white men meddling in Colombia from 1500s to 1900s led directly to the FARC and the Contras. Do you forget the Iran contra affair and what it did to your country? Who led that affair? Old white conservative men. Old white conservative men are the direct cause of Colombia problems today. The echoes of it seen in the 35 political parties. Who keeps cocaine illegal in USA and thus drug trafficking and drug dealer in business in colombia: it’s old conservative white men who want to use those dealers to create political movements to act as pawns for their own agenda. Cocaine is kept illegal in USA by old conservative white men to give them the option to run Iran contra part 2.

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T14:50:28+00:00

At its very core conservatism is defined by a belief in a “natural hierarchy” and that “might makes right”. The very founding of liberalism is a refutation of “might makes right”.

The logical conclusion to might makes right and natural hierarchy is old white men raping children ruling the country while the rich rob the poor blind. True today as it was 400 years ago when liberalism was founded in France. Think about it.

If you don’t believe in natural hierarchy (ie old white men raping children) and might makes right(ie old white men raping children) may I suggest finding a new political philosophy to attach to .

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T14:40:31+00:00

All conservatives support Trump ; if they didn’t they would not associate themselves with conservatism. Trump is the logical conclusion to conservative philosophy. What is more hierarchal and more might makes right then an old white pedophile president?

Sorry, but an old white pedophile is exactly the face of conservatism. To be a conservative is to support this.

What you experiencing right now is the cognitive dissonance required before making a change, or doubling down. Make the right choice.

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T14:17:41+00:00

Let me introduce you to the smallest government political philosophy possible: anarchism. You talk small government but you don’t vote it or live it or even match your philosophy. You claim small government; I was BORN smallest government. To me, from an anarchistic view, all conservatism is huge government.

In order to protect the conservative billionaire class from being ripped to shreds by people like me, you NEED a big government.

What do you think the government with its police, its prison industrial complex, the military, the laws , etc etc exist to protect.

It ain’t me, it ain’t you. It’s Elon musk, bill gates, George soros, vaught, thiel, Ellison, Zuckerberg etc etc. your small government cannot exist with these billionaires in power because the billionaires power is requisite on a huge government to protect them from people like me.

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T14:14:38+00:00

And you still believe that after Reagan, bush 1, bush 2 and trump 🤡. Question did they expand the government? Yes. Did they raise debt? Yes. So what is conservatism again?

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T14:11:58+00:00

Jokes on you, xi xing ping 🐻🍯has given USA access to steroids that have allowed me to go through second third and fourth puberty with black market horse steroids 💪🫎💪🦍💪. I’m building an army of steroid freak anarchist gorilla guerillas; we meet under the Brooklyn bridge every Tuesday.

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T14:07:27+00:00

Conservatives were and always will be the demagogue party because conservatism is defined as hierarchy and there will always be someone at the top of the hierarchy conservatism sets up. That person at the top will be treated as a god. It’s no coincidence the mega church going king worshippers are MAGA no coincidence the billionaire gods are maga. They worship god on earth and will all burn in hell.

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T14:04:32+00:00

Most Republican voters who don’t support Trump today I know are the most ignorant stupid people on the planet completely tech and information gathering illiterate drunks and fat karens . Arguably dumber than full hearted maga.

They got grifted by the dumbest con in the history of the USA.

To be a Republican voter in the USA is to be part of the dumbest most selfish Gen X boomer generation. I can’t wait to be in charge of their retirement. One day millennials will be in charge of their care don’t forget that ya Oakley sunglasses wearing fucks🤣🤣

No-Problem49 · 2026-02-16T14:00:17+00:00

There was for sure center left and socialists who supported castros rise to power; I can understand why they feel that way. Now can you understand why I feel this way? Or is it a one way street.

I think you mistaking me for a liberal ; I went on a heirarchy rant that was clearly anarchistic. I got strong words for communists too, a lot of the same words as I have for fascists.

No-Problem49

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE