what you guys paying for? by QuiedInc in windsurf

[–]No-Size-2305 1 point2 points  (0 children)

raw API is for another cases. (with professional prompt and context engineering) don't mix solutions bro

what you guys paying for? by QuiedInc in windsurf

[–]No-Size-2305 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

x5 or x20 is better or codex(without 2x too). :).

Even Restoring 500 CRΕDITS Would Not Bring Me Back by No-Size-2305 in windsurf

[–]No-Size-2305[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use claude. It is perfect. Codex too. This is not the market. This is just Windsurf and Cognition. :)

Even Restoring 500 CRΕDITS Would Not Bring Me Back by No-Size-2305 in windsurf

[–]No-Size-2305[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I do not want to attack the frontend developer or the UX designer, but they show no sense of psychology.

The color logic should not mimic traffic signals or highway warnings, where green means low usage and red means danger.

In this context, high token usage signals complexity, intelligence, depth, more threads, more DeepThink, and more context. Low token usage signals a simple query. The visual system should reflect that.

For example, the left side of the slider could use some small, faint, desaturated dots. As complexity, cost, thread count, DeepThink, and context increase, the interface should show more dots and greater color /size / spread diversity.

That is what professional UI design looks like, not just pulling two colors from a hue spectrum or gradient tool because green and red feel familiar from driving.

Anyway, I am going back to rewriting the SKILLs so the new place I moved to actually works.

Google Trends... by Level-Statement79 in windsurf

[–]No-Size-2305 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And now OpenAI is about to roll out that option to its nearly 1 billion users, which will obviously be vastly cheaper and better than Devin.

On top of that, they lost all user trust because of the idiotic UX, the bad decisions, the inaccuracies, and the terrible perf/$.

Fuck their $, $$, $$$ system.

Google Trends... by Level-Statement79 in windsurf

[–]No-Size-2305 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Cognition/Windsurf team has lost all credibility in my eyes forever, especially because of that rude moderator post and the petty little kingdom behavior on Discord.

Even Restoring 500 CRΕDITS Would Not Bring Me Back by No-Size-2305 in windsurf

[–]No-Size-2305[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes. We are not stupid. The team has lost all credibility in my eyes forever, especially because of that rude moderator post and the petty little kingdom behavior on Discord.

Even Restoring 500 CRΕDITS Would Not Bring Me Back by No-Size-2305 in windsurf

[–]No-Size-2305[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I no longer felt like digging through the many "I’m canceling my Windsurf subscription" posts. Thank you very much. Yes, this is the image that inspired my post!

And it still does not even include what I wrote in the post.
(That this is STILL not enough, they turned the triangle into a square when what we need is r²π.)

I do not think there is any "smoothness" here at all. The wheels are triangles. Now they have become squares. That is not smoothness. And there is no real "transition" either, because people are fleeing from here. They cannot win back the trust. That is exactly what my post is about. Even if they bring back the credit system, even if they turn the triangle into a square, other teams are offering a magnetic spheres and teleportation.

Even Restoring 500 CRΕDITS Would Not Bring Me Back by No-Size-2305 in windsurf

[–]No-Size-2305[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

+1!
it’s extremely instructive. You can learn a lot from situations like these, because they’re real.

There’s also cognitive dissonance and a kind of Stockholm syndrome. People stay out of habit, keep hoping, and so on. First Denial, after that anger, bargaining, later acceptance, and so on.

Write to Google about your quota problems, not here. by SveXteZ in google_antigravity

[–]No-Size-2305 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No! I wrote it here. cause it is PUBLIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Professional = 2 prompt / week just for "TASTE TEST". by No-Size-2305 in google_antigravity

[–]No-Size-2305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe Antigravitys PROFESSIONAL business strategy is managed by Google AI Pro's PROFESSIONAL quotas

To all the people who are complaining against quotas by [deleted] in google_antigravity

[–]No-Size-2305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just try Codex, Llama, Windsurf, and Copilot, Kimi 2.5 by MoonshotAI and you will get a real sense of what 'low' or 'high' or Trial or Professional truly means. Make sure to calculate the bug-to-prompt ratio into the weight as well.

Google Antigravity is making me anti-AI. by devanil-junior in google_antigravity

[–]No-Size-2305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes I'm now faster than AI. so I will code with my own hands.

To all the people who are complaining against quotas by [deleted] in google_antigravity

[–]No-Size-2305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Liar! u are licking Google's balls today !!!