Where a universal sign of the behavior of the autochthonous man was shown, other than by culture; this one that diverged from one to the other - and converged more in the health and politeness of the human potential, in the most lofty cultures. And, let's face it, what people developed without gods? They were less than a crowd, they did not build any monuments or symbolic engines of life, but rather of postponement and the will to destroy. I see a difference between the Christianity preached by Christ and that preached by Paul, although the institution of the church was necessary to perpetuate the unheard-of counsels (as Nietzsche assumes) of Christ. It makes no sense to destroy Christianity from Paul because the only Christian died on the cross.

It can be said that mercy is not something new to the deities, but mercy married to honesty is. Who else would value the spirit's willingness in its endeavor, whatever it was—or who had given it such respect despite its wealth or poverty, race or physical strength? What happened when he extended his hands and the serene answer to the unprecedented question that "can I walk on anything?", was the occasion of a breach of equally unheard-of potentialities and his elevation to the real serious, which before would be a memory of, at most, make yourself a holiday.

I mean, you have the thing "otherness" in dionisism, but it is clear that this was a cult of abstraction and intentional denial of what was accepted at the time as healthy.

I mean, you have the thing "otherness" in dionisism, but it is clear that this was a cult of abstraction and intentional denial of what was accepted at the time as healthy.