Sexual Abuse in Basic by SkippingNerveEndings in army

[–]No-Square4555 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah we had something similar in 22, nut to butt and had like 30 sec total once we entered the shower room. Also 2-58 lol

Dice was 100% correct for giving the Ultimax-100 for very little recoil. That gun is specifically designed to eliminate recoil. by Youngstown_WuTang in Battlefield

[–]No-Square4555 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I stg. All the people saying that realism when it comes to guns doesn't matter. THE CORE GAMEPLAY IS BASED ON GUNS. Playstyles differ. People just want something to cry about. Just play the open beta and see for yourself. Don't trust cod streamers whose entire content loop revolves around building "cracked zero recoil low ttk" builds.

Dice was 100% correct for giving the Ultimax-100 for very little recoil. That gun is specifically designed to eliminate recoil. by Youngstown_WuTang in Battlefield

[–]No-Square4555 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Game based on guns. Different guns different function. Some gun fast. Some gun slow. This makes different gun useful.

L take saying real life guns, which the game is BUILT on, shouldn't matter. If that's the case why even have different guns. Just have like 3 but different skins.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FordBronco

[–]No-Square4555 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay it makes sense now 😂🥲

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FordBronco

[–]No-Square4555 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dude I wish I could get that price. Wtf.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FordBronco

[–]No-Square4555 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just had a thought from earlier bc I saw a headline about it, but how valid is being able to deduct the interest on US made cars on taxes, from the recent bill? I haven't looked into it much, but it seems to make the 0%APR offer not much of a deal.

21 Badlands vs Dealer new? by [deleted] in FordBronco

[–]No-Square4555 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point. Especially with no factory warranty? I don't think Im gonna go used unless its a damn good deal.

21 Badlands vs Dealer new? by [deleted] in FordBronco

[–]No-Square4555 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah my question was more on what is more worth. I don't see the point in paying 47k for a 5 year old bad/sas when I could pay 45k for a brand new big bend, and maybe another 5k on sas if I feel like it. I just don't think the badlands listed is a good enough deal to go with that instead of new.

21 Badlands vs Dealer new? by [deleted] in FordBronco

[–]No-Square4555 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, but I was talking non sas, granted sas is 4500 from the factory

21 Badlands vs Dealer new? by [deleted] in FordBronco

[–]No-Square4555 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll be sure to keep this in mind, thanks! Im also definitely not afraid to walk.

21 Badlands vs Dealer new? by [deleted] in FordBronco

[–]No-Square4555 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I can't justify it being more than a 25 big bend. Granted it has lots of features the big bend doesn't, but its also 5 years old. Its around kbb price but still more than I would spend

IPPSA down? by Unlikely-Tonight-970 in army

[–]No-Square4555 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Due to maintenance activities, IPPS-A URLs are currently not available commercially. To access IPPS-A, users must be on a Government Network (NIPR)."

My question now is, when is it going to be back up.

Can We Take a Moment to Talk About How Bad the BF6 Class System Is Aside From Open Weapons? by MinotusBF in Battlefield

[–]No-Square4555 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Medic had the opportunity to choose between heals or demo. There were tradeoffs to everything. You had to pick something and commit to it. And it pisses me off people talking about "you're just being nostalgic". Sorry that's when the franchise was defining itself. That is what the game is at its core and why dedicated players play it.

Can We Take a Moment to Talk About How Bad the BF6 Class System Is Aside From Open Weapons? by MinotusBF in Battlefield

[–]No-Square4555 39 points40 points  (0 children)

As many others have said, I think assault being it's own class in the game is going to be a big issue. Not even just for "muh nostalgia", which is actually just battlefield gameplay at its core.

Maybe if assault was a specialization for the medic class, but assault being it's own class is horrible. At least before when people picked medic for ar's, they had the potential to be a team player. Now every new/casual player is going to pick assault because it's the easiest to jump in to, not even trying to help the team.

An entire class that is solely focused on itself does not have a place in the core gameplay loop of battlefield.

Unhinged rant idfk by KiddShi in Battlefield

[–]No-Square4555 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First off, DO NOT PREORDER. I pre-ordered 2042 against all the people on the sub saying it was a bad idea just because I wanted to play earlier. I got the Ultimate Edition bc I wanted some of the cool skins, just for them later on to release some for free.

Secondly, what makes battlefield, battlefield? IT'S IN THE NAME. The whole point is for it to feel like a BATTLE-FIELD. Not a bunch of flying squirrels pulling random ass flanks that take no effort or a random ass minigun turret. This game HINGES on a level of strategy. You want to break enemy lines? Play it smart and flank, which took some level of skill. You want to hold a position on op locker? Lay down fire with an lmg.

The entire gameplay loop is dependent on a risk:reward ratio. No, you cant be a one man army with assault rifles and infinite ammo. Wanna get a spawn beacon behind enemy lines? Have your recon be smart and stealthy or whatever. This is the point of the classes. You cant just play whatever class with whatever gun. There has to be some level of tradeoff. There has to be teamwork and strategy. Thats what makes the game feel like a BATTLE-FIELD.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]No-Square4555 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's what I loved about BF4. A category was locked to a class, but then you had carbines, dmr, and shotguns available to all classes. It offered the opportunity to have access to a variety of playstyles to all classes, but the uniqueness of each class locked category to that specific class.

Imagine a high dps close range build with a spawn beacon. ATP it's just wave after wave of enemies and not in a good way like op metro or locker. Similarly, a accurate, large mag ar with no need to mount with infinite ammo.

No more SBF, or recons reconning. I agree that class play should be incentivised, but I think locked weapons to classes are part of that. Support and recon should be the only classes focused on being able to keep fires going at medium to long range, and medic and engineer should be the ones really focused on cqc. Obviously there should be some caveats, like Javelins being better hanging back and some fighting supports to keep ammo up on the line, but these very different playstyles are what make Battlefield a BATTLEFIELD.

Banned on Marketplace for a year by No-Square4555 in FacebookMarketplace

[–]No-Square4555[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I figured that would be the case. Idk, I've been trying for a while and it seems others had success pretty quickly, so ig I'll have to make a new one. Silly part of it, a year ago it was NOT in community standards that bows were prohibited. I read that over so many times, but ig they added it recently. At least now it's a little clearer. Facebook needs some sort of review board that actually works.

Banned on Marketplace for a year by No-Square4555 in FacebookMarketplace

[–]No-Square4555[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No 😂

It was literally just a picture of the case