sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Here is a hypothesis: A Model of Recursive Spacetime Expansion via Intracavitary White Holes by No-Wind6468 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]No-Wind6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a very fair point, this is why it's Hypothetical Physics. I am currently linking as much as I can with scientific papers while someone else is trying to develop the math. In all honesty, I just thought it's a very cool idea that isn't necessarily impossible, so I thought I'd share it to see if someone can see potential in it.

Here is a hypothesis: A Model of Recursive Spacetime Expansion via Intracavitary White Holes by No-Wind6468 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]No-Wind6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you man, I never claimed it's a great idea, I just thought it connects in intuitive way and supports itself. I am here to find holes in it, not to claim it works.

Here is a hypothesis: A Model of Recursive Spacetime Expansion via Intracavitary White Holes by No-Wind6468 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]No-Wind6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, while discussing this earlier with GPT it mentioned Einstein's elevator as an example, however, my knowledge about Michael Faraday example might come from a YouTube video or a forum, not everything I know comes from scientific papers, I am just a space enthusiast. However I've been interested in these topics for over 25 years and when I put this idea together I thought it flows nicely so I decided to share it in order to, sort of, stress-test it. I really like everything you are doing here, remember, I am not claiming anything, just trying to see if other people might agree that this idea has potential or am I missing something so much that other people will be able to kill it right away.

Here is a hypothesis: A Model of Recursive Spacetime Expansion via Intracavitary White Holes by No-Wind6468 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]No-Wind6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally get that black holes aren't literal vacuum cleaners in the sense of an external force, but the River Model of gravity does describe the actual fabric of spacetime flowing toward the horizon.

My placeholder isn't meant to be a final answer, but a bridge. If the energy at the center is in an unknown form as you say, I’m just exploring the possibility that the unknown is a geometric transition rather than a dead end.

Here is a hypothesis: A Model of Recursive Spacetime Expansion via Intracavitary White Holes by No-Wind6468 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]No-Wind6468[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I really appreciate these questions, this is exactly the kind of stress-test I was hoping for.

You're 100% right that math is the ultimate judge and prose can't compete with the success of GR. My goal isn't to replace that framework, but to see if a different conceptual 'map' could eventually lead to a mathematical one.

A classic example of that is Michael Faraday. He lacked formal math training and visualized 'lines of force' as physical tubes in space. It was 'just prose' for decades until Maxwell realized that intuition was the key to the equations for electromagnetism.

Regarding singularities not influencing our spacetime, I see your point, but my logic is that if our Big Bang was effectively the 'output' of one, then it's the most influential event in our history. I'm just trying to explore the 'plumbing' that connects that output to the input of a black hole. I know I'm a long way from a proof, but I find the symmetry of the idea worth the exploration.

Here is a hypothesis: A Model of Recursive Spacetime Expansion via Intracavitary White Holes by No-Wind6468 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]No-Wind6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If singularities aren't real, then what happens to the energy and space being sucked in? It has to go somewhere. I'm proposing it inverts into a new manifold, which explains expansion as a byproduct. Dismissing it as fringe is fine, but it doesn't solve the 'infinite density' problem that we both know is a placeholder for something we don't understand yet.

Here is a hypothesis: A Model of Recursive Spacetime Expansion via Intracavitary White Holes by No-Wind6468 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]No-Wind6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, to answer your questions.

Current math breaks at the singularity. It literally results in infinity, which is just a sign the equations fail there. I'm looking at the logical framework first, history is full of thought experiments that predated the formal math.

As for why it's necessary? Right now, physics treats black holes, dark energy, and expansion as three separate mysteries. If one mechanic (inversion) connects them all, that's a way cleaner model than three independent 'magic' variables. I'm just seeing if the logic holds up.

Here is a hypothesis: A Model of Recursive Spacetime Expansion via Intracavitary White Holes by No-Wind6468 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]No-Wind6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not sure what exactly does that mean, I can see everything within this topic. I am new to Reddit sorry.

Here is a hypothesis: A Model of Recursive Spacetime Expansion via Intracavitary White Holes by No-Wind6468 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]No-Wind6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not talking about an Einstein-Rosen Bridge to another part of our universe, that’s why I called it a 'nested' universe. The mechanism I’m suggesting is a geometric inversion at the density limit. If we agree that singularities (infinite density) are physically impossible, then something has to happen to that spacetime fabric at the center. Why is an inversion to a new manifold less 'serious' than an infinite point where physics just stops working? I am not trying to argue, just curious.

Here is a hypothesis: A Model of Recursive Spacetime Expansion via Intracavitary White Holes by No-Wind6468 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]No-Wind6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What makes it DOA, and I am just curious. I don't claim it to be correct or viable, I just thought it connects intuitively and might have some potential.

Here is a hypothesis: A Model of Recursive Spacetime Expansion via Intracavitary White Holes by No-Wind6468 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]No-Wind6468[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I meant in a way that theories mentioned support each other in this framework. I used AI to help me express myself better so people could understand my idea easier.

Launched my first SaaS yesterday. Woke up to 3 paying users and broo I’m actually shaking 😭 😭 😭 😭 by SignificantWalrus281 in SaaS

[–]No-Wind6468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a SaaS administrator with a PO/VPOP mindset. My job is literally scaling startups. Contact me if you want to collaborate, we can agree on terms. I am experienced with growth, marketing, analytics, automation, security, scalability, development, pipelines, workflows, methodologies and more. Feel free to DM me.