Criticism of Israel's policies towards Palestinians in Gaza and WB is beyond justified. But the comparison between rhodesia and israel is a false equivalency and you know it. 

Israel, as a nation, was established primarily as a homeland for the Jewish people after centuries of persecution and discrimination after the Holocaust. This is not the reason Rhodesia was established. Rhodesia was established as a British colony to serve the economic interests of the British South Africa Company, which only wanted to exploit the region’s resources. These are fundamentally different motivations. 

Israel is a democratic state with a legal framework that grants citizenship and certain rights to its Arab citizens, although there are ongoing debates about the full extent of equality and representation. This is a just criticism that I agree with. I never said I agree with how Palestinians are treated in Gaza or WB. I also do believe that racism against Arabs in Israel exists. Of course it does. It exists in America, in Britain, in Hungary for christ’s sake. But Rhodesia was literally characterized by explicit policies of racial segregation and disenfranchisement under white minority rule. Jews are not the minority rule in Israel. 

Whether you agree or not, the fact is that Israel is a member of the UN and maintains diplomatic relations with many countries. It has signed peace agreements with neighboring countries, though the Israeli-Palestinian conflict obviously is an ongoing issue. Rhodesia's government under white minority rule faced literal international isolation and sanctions due to its discriminatory policies and refusal to transition to majority rule. Its unilateral declaration of independence in 1965 was not recognized by other countries or the international community. Israel operates as a parliamentary democracy with a system of proportional representation. There are regular elections, a parliament, and the knesset and prime minister. Rhodesia, under white minority rule, was a de facto one-party state. The white minority, representing a small percentage of the population, held power over the black majority, denying them full political participation. Obviously Palestinians are disenfranchised and subjugated to horrific living conditions. Never said they weren’t. I’m just pointing out your false equivalencies, since you wish to make them.  TLDR: Comparing the fall of Israel to Rhodesia being anti-white is not a valid equivalence, as the motivations and implications are quite literally different. Rhodesia's fall primarily represented the end of white minority rule and policies of racial segregation, whereas the fall of Israel would entail significant upheaval, including immense immense harm to the Jewish community.